**Why is it that NOT A SINGLE ONE** of these persons is willing to look the camera directly in the eye while this statement and claims are being made....is it because the claims and statement are questionable...is it that some of these "professionals" have external code of ethics tied to their profession and therefore they don't want to be labled as *unethical in making unsubtantiated, non-independently verifiable statement to benefit their own self interest*

ur grasping for straws!

And whose funeral was this photo taken at? Or are the long faces because there's no money left to pay the pipers and line the pockets?

Once again it does look like they are at a funeral.

Our leaders' faces tell it all - "What is being said is a pile of garbage and I'm glad it is not me saying it". Eyes don't lie.

Prime Minister Perry Christie is still in the campaign mode. Now is the time to remind the PM of the idiom "People in glass houses should not through stones" which can be translated as "do not criticize others if you have weaknesses yourself." or as the late Michael Jackson wrote "
I'm Starting With The Man In
The Mirror
I'm Asking Him To Change
His Ways
And No Message Could Have
Been Any Clearer
If You Wanna Make The World
A Better Place
(If You Wanna Make The
World A Better Place)
Take A Look At Yourself, And
Then Make A Change
(Take A Look At Yourself, And
Then Make A Change)"

Its funny how 242 could have pointed out when someone else uses a comment to insult him, yet he, concerncitizen and notsogullible is doing the same. By the way if you take your own advise and comprehend a picture instead of trying to be insulting you would notice that the Prime Minister is in the middle of speaking and the group around him is listening attentively. 'Oracle', this is a still picture that was randomly taken, no instructions were given (say cheese) when it was took, so when an individual is speaking, most people tend to look in the direction of the speaker or do some other means of focusing on what is being said. I strongly think to look at a camera-man relentlessly wondering if now is when hes going to take the shot only distracts a listener.

"Positiveinput" it is not about a photograph. There can be many interpretations including "Oracle's". The words of the PM should be our concern and we "the people" should ensure congruence between what he says and the behavior of his government.

Ok Arob, in reposnce to your comment all I am trying to get across to especially 242 is that under a different headline he stated to me I only know how to insult - try to insult. So give me your honest opinion, comparing the men in the picture to that of being at a furneral, or classing our Prime Minister, a male as a Queen; wouldn't that be trying to insult. Lets put right where right is whether we support fnm or plp. Like you said its not about a photograph because under the headling FNM Criticises Budget For Playing The Blame Game - those men express the same 'funeral' expression or theres a pic of Butler-Turner that many plp's if wanted could have criticise and make spot of but again I fully agree wiith you that it is not about the photograph, so instead of scolding me, start with notsogullible and 242. I'm am more a you start I finish person so now you'll understand my post to 242 originated from another headline.

with all due respect positiveinput ,and i like your screen name,i wasn,t even looking at the pic,,,and i try to be positive ,but remembering 2002 to 2007 and seeing the same people ,its hard

Respect acknowledge at the same time respect return also. Still it was just disturbing for '242' and 'notsogullible' to make spot (insulting remarks) of a picture, when under another headline wanted to scold an individual for insulting a comment that was post first bythem. You just ended up getting mixed up with them as a result of posting we have a 'queen' which showed a level of insult towards a male prime minister. We would comment about our school children attitude towards authority (teachers/administration) but look at us grown-ups. Posting negative comments about our ministers (administrative personnel) facial appearance or comparing a male to the likeness of a queen; what more should we expect from our kids.

Majority of persons commenting try to be insulting because of political preference. If the PLP headlines says 'X', FNM post why not 'Y' or vice-versa, when its logical that if both supporting team discuss their veiws as real adults we would conclude that using whomever party plans with the involvement of various points from the other party, this - OUR BAHAMALAND would be a better place. Remember the saying 'No man is an island', lets take it on step further 'One political party alone does not make up the island'.

I was referring to the dark colors they been wearing lately. Point taken pisitiveinput. The man is Prime Minister. I do not support the plp but I support the Bahamas. However before making my previous statement i noticed on ur previous statements you called me and others dumb and stupid simply because we disagreed with a point of view. Like I said I will try to refrain from insulting Prime Minister Perry Christie. There are sevetal paryies but there is one country you me and all of us love. Which will be 39 years old this year.

with all do respect ,i always thought PGC was honest and kind hearted just a little weak ....after the BPC thing and the people he brought back i am no longer of that belief,,, 20 yrs ago i witnessed someting w/ my own eyes that i was willing to overlook ,as i get older and less liberal ,i am not ..i will never insult a blogger ,but people that run for office and deal with our money put themselves in the position to be judged....we pay them ,they don,t pay us ....i don,t like our new goverment and the people around it ,but i do love my country and wish for the best ...