Tuesday, November 13, 2012
By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Tribune Staff Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
AMID widespread uncertainty over the approaching referendum to decide if web-shops are legalised, the church has launched an aggressive educational campaign to ensure an informed “no” vote, according to Grace Community Church Pastor Lyall Bethel.
And while the church has largely appealed to the morals of those who will turn out to the polls, Mr Bethel yesterday said Bahamians should vote “no” if they do not understand the implications of what a majority “yes“ vote could do to the country.
In addition, Mr Bethel suggested that the government could be perusing the referendum to secure public support rather than impose additional taxes on Bahamian citizens.
“Governments are not concerned with morals,” he said. “No one likes to tax because taxes cause you to lose elections.”
Mr Bethel is a part of a group of pastors who have formed the Save Our Bahamas - Vote No Campaign. The organisation’s website www.saveourbahamas.com, outlines in detail, reasons Bahamians should vote no.
These include the violation of national values, hurting the most vulnerable, adding to the nation’s social ills, causing crime to skyrocket and promoting a negative lifestyle, among other things. However, those in favour of web-shop legalisation have said the millions in tax revenue would advance education, culture and social programmes in the country.
“We have grave concerns that these organised crime bosses are allowed to advertise in newspapers, erect signs and were allowed to be in the public treasury giving out t-shirts. Where does this sudden cloak of respectability come from?
“Gambling does not put money into the economy it hoards money.
“They say everyone wins, but ask the children waiting outside while their mothers are spinning away child support cheques.
“They are preying on the vulnerable and the poor. Selling false hope to people that need help.”
He further responded to claims that voting “no” would displace 3,000 persons that are employed by the hundreds of web-shops throughout the country.
“Do they want us to say that we should be sympathetic while the fact of the matter is that they are allowing these people to be a part of organised crime.”
Moving forward, Mr Bethel defended the church’s right to speak out on web-shop legalisation.
“Gambling is a national debate and the church has the greatest clout to speak on it. We are constantly helping people. No one ought to believe that we can’t.”
As referendum day approaches, the Save Our Bahamas campaign will host a number of events, including two prayer sessions. Thousands of educational flyers and brochures are also being distributed.
Comments
banker says...
Instead of legalizing the numbers houses, the government should nationalize them.
Posted 13 November 2012, 3:09 p.m. Suggest removal
jt says...
Where do these people live? Numbers houses abound (why are we still calling them "web shops"? Why would you name an Internet cafe "Island Luck"? Do you need luck to get online in an establishment dedicated to getting people online?). Gambling is happening flagrantly all around us. Take the proceeds and funnel them into our deplorable educational system.
Posted 13 November 2012, 4:03 p.m. Suggest removal
TalRussell says...
PM Christie lead his party to a landslide win to wrestle away the government from the FNM back in 2002 and then quickly by his own doing, and with lots help by some sitting closely around him, his majority win administration quickly descend into being known as the "Stupid" administration.
PM take the many warnings for exactly what they are that this "opinion" thing you're proposing on licensing the numbers rackets men's, is even more "stupid" than what you did to turn the government back over to the FNM in 2007.
I think, Therefore I Blog. You decide.
http://tribune242.com/users/photos/2012…
Posted 13 November 2012, 5:45 p.m. Suggest removal
242 says...
So knowing this u still supported the same PC 100% and help got him and almost exactly the same team back in for another 5 years. Sometimes I wonder if you all more voted AGAINST Ingraham than FOR Christie... That is the only way it would make sense.
Posted 14 November 2012, 8:15 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment