Friday, December 6, 2013
By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Tribune Staff Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
AN angry woman yesterday lashed out at officials who toured several shanty towns in New Providence where demolition has taken place.
The woman, who warned reporters not to come near her as she stood on the porch of a wooden structure on Carmichael Road, challenged the government over their efforts that resulted in several homes being removed.
“What y’all coming round here for?” she asked. “You done been here one time six months ago saying we have to break the things down, now six months later you come back? What for?”
Officials explained that such an outburst has been a common occurrence in the last few months as they moved through the 16 shanty towns on the island.
Yesterday the media toured three of them, which included one on Joe Farrington Road, another on Seabreeze Lane and the third on Carmichael Road west.
Environment Minister Kenred Dorsett said the government has remained determined to abolish slum villages and assist the residents in alternative living accommodations. However, officials said they have seen some attempts to rebuild where land has already been cleared.
“Thus far,” he said, “we haven’t seen any additional shanty towns created.
“Where we have seen some activity, the Ministry of Works and the unit have moved in immediately before any construction could have been completed.
“So we are trying to contain this as much as possible. This shows the media that it’s now gone beyond talk and the demolition is happening and we are clearing out the shanty towns.
“From the reports that I have seen there have been attempts (to rebuild). I think that that is one of the reasons why we are moving quickly to remove the structures.
“But through the constant monitoring and vigilance (we are) minimising any attempts to repopulate or construct these areas.”
And with the country’s hard pressed financial times, Mr Dorsett said the government did not incur any additional costs in clearing out the shanty towns.
Jeffery Cooper, an inspector with the Ministry of Public Works and Urban Development, said only residents who submitted applications for upgrades to their homes will be allowed to remain in their homes.
He spoke of the matter at a shanty town at Seabreeze Lane where there were once around 30 shacks. Yesterday there were only three standing.
The upgrading will consist of electric work, ensuring there is running water and other amenities, roof work among other things, work to make the home livable.
Mr Dorsett urged persons interested in government housing to apply so that they can be considered.
Comments
ThisIsOurs says...
*Jeffery Cooper, an inspector with the Ministry of Public Works and Urban Development, said only residents who submitted applications for upgrades to their homes will be allowed to remain in their homes*
I don't understand the statement , is that in relation to shanty town inhabitants? Are they upgrading homes for people who don't own the land? Just asking I don't know. Was there communication on the application process ...again just asking
Posted 6 December 2013, 4:12 p.m. Suggest removal
john33xyz says...
Maybe there is a PDF of the application form on bahamas.gov.bs ?? LOL I won't waste my time to look for it.
Posted 6 December 2013, 7:58 p.m. Suggest removal
bismark says...
Mr Minister Kenred Dorsette,sir,before I was allowed to build on my OWN LAND,i was required to have a valid building permit,i am a born Bahamian of FULL BAHAMIAN PARENTS,there fore I have to apply to build a structure who the hell she think she is to come in this country and override my rights or any other Bahamian?sir you better get it right before all hell break loose in this country Bahamian people are fed up with this illegal shit,you have made a stand,hold your ground.
Posted 7 December 2013, 1:29 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
I don't know if that's what he's saying, the article was confusing.
Posted 7 December 2013, 8:54 a.m. Suggest removal
TalRussell says...
Readers are anxious to know who is it at the Tribune whose the one routinely placing their hand over the photographer's camera lens, thus denying readers to see the real story through photographs? Sure as hell would help unconfused some of your loyal readers.
Posted 7 December 2013, 11:29 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment