Leaving webshops ‘illegal’ undermines financial status

The Bahamas’ status as well-regulated financial services jurisdiction will be undermined if webshop gaming is allowed to persist as an illegal activity, the Gaming Board’s chairman warned yesterday.

Reiterating previous statements by the Prime Minister, Andre Rollins, who is also MP for Fort Charlotte, said the Bahamas’ anti-money laundering regime could not be effective if a sector that conducted financial transactions worth multi-million dollar sums annually remained outside the regulatory regime.

The webshop gaming industry is estimated to gross $400 million annually, or more than $1 million per day, and Mr Rollins, in a statement, said: “To continue to allow gaming houses in the Bahamas to exist without

appropriate regulatory controls creates the potential for the infiltration of, and control, by criminal entities, which could very easily produce adverse domestic and international consequences.

“Our nation’s financial regulatory regime, and the reporting requirements it imposes on businesses engaged in financial services, cannot be effective if it ignores a large group of businesses which conduct significant financial transactions.

“This is critical for our country if we wish to maintain our

standing as a responsible financial services jurisdiction, compliant with international anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism best practices.”

Speaking out ahead of the so-called ‘gaming referendum’, which is scheduled for next Monday, Mr Rollins set out what he considered are the issues that Bahamians need to contemplate.

Insisting that the Bahamas “cannot permit any industry to operate outside the purview of the law, and without proper regulation and oversight”, Mr Rollins said webshop gaming could not be regulated “in part; it must be regulated as a whole.

“The Government cannot be perceived as being guilty of engendering a culture where laws are selectively observed and applied, where law enforcement and not justice is blind.”

Mr Rollins said lawful gaming regimes existed throughout the Caribbean, having replaced previously underground gaming operations. He added that they all survived as regulated ones despite concerns that they would be undermined by the impact of taxation on revenues and/or player winnings.

Noting that the Government would receive a new revenue stream from taxing webshop gaming, Mr Rollins said a ‘no’ vote on Monday to both questions would not end Bahamian demand for ‘numbers.

He added that the Government would be under “greater pressure” to use scarce police resources to crack down on webshops, drawing personnel and fund away from fighting violent crime.

“While it has admittedly taken far too long for any government to muster the political will and courage to police this unregulated activity, and despite the fact that preparation for this referendum has been an awkward and untidy process, it cannot be argued that fifty-plus years is insufficient time to know whether or not something should be regulated or taxed for the benefit of our country and people,” Mr Rollins said.

“The alternative is to yield to the calls to postpone this process and risk perpetuating government that is irresponsible and a society that is ungovernable.”

Comments

JohnDoe says...

What utter nonsense these governing MPs are talking. The fact of the matter is that this activity is currently illegal and the monetary proceeds derived from these businesses would be proceeds from the commission of a crime. Mr. Rollins we do have a "Proceeds of Crime Act" currently on the books that tells us exactly what we ought to do in these circumstances. None of these businesses or their principals should have been allowed to open or operating any bank accounts under our current AML/KYC laws. Further, any financial institution that has opened or is operating accounts for any of these businesses or their principals is currently breaking the law. The greater risk for the Bahamas in the international financial community is what happens if there is a "Yes" vote, in which case we would then be forced to give Webshop licenses to persons who may have been indicted in the US for serious crimes. Further the government has provided no legislative framework or information on the AML/KYC legislation and requirements for webshop customers or owners. We do not know what we would be voting yes for. I have no moral objections to gaming, but it seem to me that this process is so fundamentally flawed that in good conscience it becomes impossible to vote yes.

Posted 21 January 2013, 4:27 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment