Friday, July 19, 2013
By SANCHESKA BROWN
Tribune Staff Reporter
sbrown@tribunemedia.net
A 15-year-old boy has been charged in connection with the shooting of a five-year-old boy, The Tribune understands.
The media was not alerted to the arraignment, but it is understood that the juvenile was charged with grievous harm. It is alleged that on June 28, the teen intentionally cause harm to the toddler, who was playing in a yard with another child when the incident occurred. He was granted bail in the amount of $5,000.
Comments
lazybor says...
pure crazyness...<img src="http://tinyurl.com/c7l9ck6" width="1">
Posted 19 July 2013, 4:30 p.m. Suggest removal
concernedcitizen says...
and he got bail ,,only 5000 ,,man half bag of grass or stealing bread and sausage and bail is 5 grand w/ seruity ,,,,what up
Posted 19 July 2013, 5:28 p.m. Suggest removal
Bahamianpride says...
The guy who is accussed of damaging road held without bail, an accused murderer released on $5000 bail ???????????????????
Posted 20 July 2013, 2:54 p.m. Suggest removal
sansoucireader says...
SANCHESKA BROWN: The dictionary definition of a toddler is someone between one and three years old. A five-year old is a young child.
Is this the second charge for this 15-year old? Sounds like he's on the road to destruction, his own and anyone else's in his path. He needs to be locked up and not on bail creating more chaos.
Posted 20 July 2013, 4 p.m. Suggest removal
positiveinput says...
Just charged with grievous harm, I guess he was the owner of the weapon aye. And what ever happen to the person responsible for killing the two animal lovers on the out island, did I miss the update if anyone was charged?
Posted 22 July 2013, 1:07 a.m. Suggest removal
dontliveonregerts says...
@positiveinput - from your lips to God's ears!
I'd also like to know what ever happened with the police officers who killed those 2 men while they had them in custody.
Posted 22 July 2013, 10:17 a.m. Suggest removal
positiveinput says...
This island is too small to have such major incidents going unanswered. Still when you ask the questions, those in authority turn a blind eye and deaf ear. And I just really catch myself, the man who dug up the road - mind u a road that isn't open as yet so at the time it was abandon, not even workers were present, didn't get bail due to being a risk to the public. However a teenager could use a firearm against a FIVE (5) year old and not be considered dangerous. wtf I know those individuals with court matters asking please to go before that judge. lol
Posted 22 July 2013, 11:38 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment