Wilson questions Cash over BTC comments

By RASHAD ROLLE

FNM chairman Darron Cash’s comments about BTC prove he “doesn’t know what he is talking about” according to Frankie Wilson, the lead negotiator in the government’s efforts to regain majority shares in the company.

Mr Wilson was responding to Mr Cash’s accusation that the government has struck a secret deal with BTC to extend its monopoly on the telecommunications market while withholding information from the Bahamian people.

He told The Tribune yesterday that “clearly Mr Cash does not know what he is talking about. Maybe there is an obligation for him to say something because he is chairman but clearly he’s showing his ignorance”.

Mr Wilson also said negotiations between the government and BTC are being affected by the competing political interests surrounding the issue.

“From a tactical point of view, it is best in negotiations for there to be equality on both sides,” he said, adding that contrary to what Mr Cash claims, not only has the government been forthcoming with the public on BTC, but they’ve also done so while BTC representatives have remained silent.

“Equality is not possible in this instance because it has a strong political component to it because the opposition keeps making statements that have no basis,” he said. “And it is not in the country’s long term interest for us to keep reporting on the issue while the chairman of BTC says nothing. Let the process play out.

“I don’t wish to get into any partisan political divide. We want to pursue something of national interest. In this season of independence, people should try and identify things that are in the national interest. It is important to the country that we get BTC back the right way.”

Mr Wilson also reiterated his stance that the initial deal made between the Ingraham administration and BTC in 2011 “was an incontrovertibly bad transaction for the country”, adding that “the public will see evidence for that.”

He also addressed claims that BTC was sold for $200 million, saying the country did not net anywhere near that.

“Let Mr Cash go back to the rally where the PM said he is selling BTC because we needed the money. He was being truthful. He told the people that at Fort Charlotte that and it was a fact. The fact is selling BTC was a bad deal.

“No former Cabinet minister is trying to defend this; they’ve left Mr Cash to discuss this. He wasn’t in the Cabinet so he doesn’t know what he is talking about and he doesn’t know what he does not know,” Mr Wilson said.

When asked to comment, Marlon Johnson, vice president of marketing and sales at BTC, told The Tribune it is against BTC policy to discuss matters relating to the ownership of the company.

Comments

ThisIsOurs says...

A long long time ago in a land far far away, the Prime Minister reported that the buy-back negotiations were not going the way he would have liked. Budget realities would not favour the reacquisition of the company and he would have to bring the discussions to a conclusion at some point. Shocking details surrounding the original deal were uncovered by Mr Wilson but never revealed.

**Four months** later the battle continues...

Does either the Prime Minister or Mr Wilson know the meaning of a Pyrrhic victory?

At Heraclea in 279 BC, King Pyrrhus of Epirus fought a battle against Roman forces. He won the battle but lost the greater part of his army, almost all of his close friends and senior commanders.

He is attributed with multiple quotes regarding his *victory*:
-"Another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone"
-"If we are *victorious* in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined*

King Pyrrhus ultimately lost the war. A Pyrrhic victory, is a victory in which the **bigger picture** is lost, such devastating consequences are experienced it renders the short term victory meaningless.

Posted 2 July 2013, 5:04 a.m. Suggest removal

eddyu says...

I just required some information and was searching on Google for it. I visited each page that came on first page and didn’t got any relevant result then I thought to check out the second one and got your blog. This is what I wanted [Rolex][1]!

[1]: http://www.irolexbase.com

Posted 16 January 2014, 2:52 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment