Thursday, March 14, 2013
By LAMECH JOHNSON
Tribune Staff Reporter
ljohnson@tribunemedia.net
THE INJUNCTION preventing law enforcement officers taking action against web shop gaming operators still stands after the government’s application to have the injunction lifted was delayed by three weeks.
In yesterday’s proceedings before Chief Justice Sir Michael Barnett which saw no legal appearances present for Island Luck, Island Game, FML Group of Companies, Asue Draw, Whatfall and Chances, Alfred Sears and Jeffery Lloyd, who represent Paradise Games, claimed the Crown had presented their office a 93-page document inclusive of exhibits on Friday, March 8 minutes before 5pm.
Mr Sears said that as a result, he hadn’t been able to take instructions from his client and prepare and submit the requisite documents in response to the affidavit prior to the proceedings.
Crown attorney Lauren Klein argued that the affidavit was merely a document with reference to particulars of the conservatory order made six weeks ago. He said that the respondents should’ve been prepared to proceed and the Crown’s hand should not be tied by the order.
The legal battle ensued just days after the January 28 referendum, which sought to legalise and tax web shop gambling and a national lottery, was rejected by the electorate. The following day, on January 29, Prime Minister Perry Christie ordered that all web shops cease their operations.
He had said in the lead up to referendum day that his administration would follow the law after voters had their say. However, the numbers bosses took legal action on January 30 in the Supreme Court.
They made an application and Senior Justice Jon Isaacs granted an injunction that prevented the government and the police from taking any action against the patrons and operators of web shops pending the outcome of a conservatory order that was filed by attorneys representing said webshops.
At the beginning of the month, Attorney General Allyson Maynard-Gibson confirmed the government’s plans to file an application on March 13 to lift the injunction.
Yesterday Crown attorneys Mr Klein, Darren Henfield, Darcell Williamson and Melissa Wright-Knowles came to do that.
However, Mr Sears argued that their late servicing of the affidavit was not sufficient time to take instructions and submit a summons documents accordingly. While acknowledging both submissions made by the Crown and attorneys representing Paradise Games, the chief justice expressed concern about the absence of legal representatives for the other web shop operators involved in the injunction.
“Why aren’t they here today?” Chief Justice Sir Michael asked Mr Sears.
Mr Sears said he received an email from attorney Wayne Munroe explaining his absence. Mr Klein said he received a similar email some minutes prior to the proceedings.
In the email sent by Mr Munroe to Mr Sears it says that his office received an affidavit from the Crown minutes to 5pm on March 8.
Mr Munroe said the document was so extensive he would need more time to look at what was being put forward, receive instructions from his clients, and respond accordingly.
The Chief Justice granted the extension and deferred the application’s hearing to April 2. He ordered that responding affidavits had to be filed a week before that date.
Comments
TalRussell says...
Comrade Reporter Lamech you need to get this right. There is NO court injunction preventing law enforcement officers from taking action against web shop gaming operators. As it stands now, tis the PLP government who have decided to stand still and not move against the numbers "bosses?" The PM and his Cabinet colleagues have all for their own reasons made a "voluntarily" decision not to call the "Commish of DA Police" in to commence with the raiding the web shops which are openly selling illegal numbers behind the darken windows and security protected entrances.
And, if you think they is only renting out internet stuff .... then you're as big of an ass as the pretense go'in on within the PLP government, that they are powerless to act against the numbers sellers?
Even is this was true, may I ask what court injunction applies to the hundreds of number sellers working for the web shop "bosses" who the police see every damn day out there across our Bahamaland, selling and collecting cash for numbers and returning the cash to their employers?
http://tribune242.com/users/photos/2013…
Posted 14 March 2013, 11:34 a.m. Suggest removal
nationbuilder says...
true
Posted 15 March 2013, 10:32 a.m. Suggest removal
concernedcitizen says...
instead of the treasury getting the money ,,all the lawyers and plenty of the judges ga get their tax by the time this thing is finished
Posted 14 March 2013, 1:05 p.m. Suggest removal
legalmindatwork says...
All of this has been one giant stall tactic from the jump. I'm sure that when they return in three week's time there will be another issue...perhaps a page is missing from the bundle of documents which would cause a further delay. It seems like everyone is acting in collusion with one another and sadly the lawyers that are on retainer will get richer and make a continuous mockery of our legal system.
Posted 14 March 2013, 1:13 p.m. Suggest removal
nationbuilder says...
very true
Posted 15 March 2013, 10:33 a.m. Suggest removal
BahamasGamingAssociation says...
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bahamas-…
WHICH ON OF THE BELOW REIGNS SUPREME IN THE BAHAMAS?
The Bahamas Lottery and Gaming Act Chapter 387 Section 50 Persons prohibited from Gaming
Or
The Constitution of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas Chapter III – Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedom of the Individual. Section 26 Protection from Discrimination on grounds of Race, Place of Origin etc.
The Bahamas Gaming Association stands by the Ideology that all human beings who are 18 years or older should be treated equally in all sectors of the Bahamian Economy which is enshrined in the Constitution of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.
Posted 30 June 2014, 4:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment