Gov's 'clear marching orders' from IMF on VAT

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Government has “clearly got its marching orders” on Value-Added Tax (VAT) from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), a co-chair for the private sector’s Tax Coalition warning that it was “highly likely” the latter was telling the Christie administration what to do.

Robert Myers told Tribune Business that it was difficult not to believe the Government was taking orders from the Washington-based Fund on VAT’s implementation unless studies on the new tax’s economic impact were released publicly.

Arguing that both the IMF and the Government were being ‘irresponsible’ in pushing forward to implement VAT by July 1, 2014, despite the increasing opposition, the businessman called on the Fund to put “skin in the game”.

He called on the IMF to, if it was “so sure” that VAT was the right option for the Bahamas, sign a contract where it guaranteed to relieve a portion of this nation’s debt burden if the tax reform backfired.

And Mr Myers also questioned the IMF/Government expectations that the $2.6 billion Baha Mar project would fuel this nation’s economic growth, saying no studies had been produced to disprove the fear that the new resort would end up splitting - not growing - the high-end visitor market with Atlantis.

Mr Myers, who jointly heads the Bahamas Chamber of Commerce and Employers Confederation’s (BCCEC) Coalition for Responsible Taxation, was responding after the IMF’s statement on its Article IV mission urged the Government “to deploy all efforts and resources” to both hit the VAT implementation deadline and win more support for the reform.

Confirming that fellow Coalition co-chair, Gowon Bowe, and others had met with the IMF during its visit that ended on Saturday, Mr Myers said the meeting only raised “more questions and the concern that they’ve done the right analysis”.

“They clearly don’t have broad-based support,” he told Tribune Business. “They’ve [the Government] clearly got their marching orders for implementation from the IMF, but clearly we don’t support their broad-based support concept.”

Mr Myers said the discussion kept coming back to the Coalition’s belief, and that of others, that neither the Government nor the IMF were taking “the responsible approach” over VAT and the wider tax/fiscal reform issue.

This, he added, stemmed from the fact that neither had released a ‘dynamic economic impact analysis’ of the impact VAT, and other potential tax reforms, would likely have on the Bahamian economy.

While the draft VAT legislation and regulations have been released to select parties, the Government has yet to reveal the revised Tariff Schedule or economic impact studies.

The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) is undertaking such a study, but this is thought to be incomplete and has not been disclosed, although the Government has drawn upon this to assert that VAT’s inflationary impact will be no more than 5-6 per cent.

Asked whether he thought the Government was merely doing what the IMF was telling it to do, in relation to VAT, Mr Myers told Tribune Business: “That’s highly likely.

“Unless they can give us the economic impact analysis, we have no choice but to think that...... to assume that’s the case.”

Mr Myers again asked where the VAT economic impact study was and, if it was in existence, “on what basis did you draw these conclusions”.

Asking the IMF and the Government “on what basis have you concluded this [VAT] is the right thing to do”, he added: “The transparency here is critical.

“Do we trust the IMF is right, or slow things down? If we put a band aid on this, it might be a bigger problem in three-four years time. Yet it might be a bigger problem in a year-and-a-half if the economy regresses.

“That’s the big danger here and why we’re saying: ‘Guys, slow this thing down. Do not let the blind lead the blind. No one’s pushing here. Let’s take a breath, and make sure we’re taking the right decision by having all the information on the table.”

Going further, Mr Myers called on the IMF, if it was so confident that VAT and the Bahamas were a great marriage, to “guarantee to pick up the slack”.

“If they’re so sure of it, and the Government is so sure of it, let’s sign a contract with the IMF that if this thing does not go the way it must go, they will relieve us of our debt,” he added.

“If they’re [the IMF] willing to put some skin in the game, I’m willing to give it a shot. If they’re so sure, let them put skin in the game, guarantee they’ll relieve us of our debt if they’re wrong.”

Mr Myers told Tribune Business that “there’s no price elasticity anywhere” in the Bahamian economy, meaning it would be difficult for anybody to absorb the inflationary effects from 15 per cent VAT.

“Who the hell can take that?” he asked. “The consumer sure can’t, the consumer sure can’t, and the foreign consumer in the shape of tourists is already switching to other jurisdictions.”

Noting that the IMF assessment also appeared to be pinning hopes for Bahamian economic recovery solely on Baha Mar, Mr Myers again questioned whether it and the Government had “seen something we haven’t”.

He queried whether studies had been done on whether Baha Mar would grow or split the high-end visitor market with Atlantis, or whether the Government was “taking a swing at it”.

“We’re hoping Baha Mar fills the rooms, and Atlantis and the other hotels don’t get cannibalised,” Mr Myers told Tribune Business.

“There’s reasonable concern there. We need them [Baha Mar] to be successful. We want Baha Mar to be wildly successful. The Government needs it, the business community needs it, and the people need it. We hope they are right.”

Comments

Reality_Check says...

As a US citizen who has resided in the Bahamas for many years, I can only simply laugh at how foolish Bahamian voters are. It is well known that the IMF, WTO, World Bank, IDB, OECD, etc. are all agencies in the main of US foreign policy tasked with destabilizing other countries whenever it is considered to be in the best economic or security interest of the US. The destabilization is typically accomplished by getting the country hooked on more foreign debt than it can possibly ever service. It is also often accomplished by forcing a country to replace its more cost efficient and more easily monitored/enforced taxation systems (like import duties in the case of the Bahamas) with other taxation systems that are not suitable for the country due to their revenue raising ineffectiveness, excessive costliness to administer (for both the government and taxpayers alike) and inability to be cost effectively enforced.
It is really all too easy in countries like the Bahamas with a largely poorly educated voting citizenry to get dimwitted greedy influence peddling politicians and their crony supporters (whether they be on the PLP or FNM side of the table) to "sell out" their country by sucking on the "borrowing tit" placed at their lips by self-interested foreign interests.

Posted 19 November 2013, 4:15 p.m. Suggest removal

nationbuilder says...

true, the government is doing what it is told, and it agreed with what it was told by the IMF to do - the IMF said so itself

Posted 19 November 2013, 4:46 p.m. Suggest removal

Puzzled says...

Hey Reality_check it does seem as if the US has followed its own nefarious ways by getting deep in debt to China. However they have gone one step further by being so far in debt that China cannot allow the US dollar to fall or they will go with it. It does seem a really risky path to travel. I do agree that for almost a century the US has been changing other countries fortunes by luring them into heavy international borrowing through US 'stealth' agencies.

Posted 19 November 2013, 6:46 p.m. Suggest removal

countryfirst says...

Wake up Bahamians this V.A.T. is not good for us.The P.M. should be trying to figure out how to boost this economy not stop it, THIS IS TREASON.

Posted 19 November 2013, 9:12 p.m. Suggest removal

Reality_Check says...

Christie, Halkitis and Rolle have offered no explanation whatsoever for how more than 60% of government payroll is paid to banks by way of payroll deductions with a large portion of that amount being repayments of consumer loans owed by government employees to local banks. Small wonder a bank like Commonwealth Bank has over the years produced very handsome profits for the Symmonettes and other similar politically well connected families. Other banks like Fidelity and Bank of The Bahamas have changed their business models away from housing and business mortgage loans to consumer loans for cars, home appliances, furniture, etc. in an effort to get on the same gravy train but they may be a day too late. Now that word is out that these banks are effectively being propped up by a policy of government payroll deductions run amok, government is scrambling to bring in more revenue any way it can so that it can continue its policy of buying votes through the allowance of excessive payroll deductions to government employees. It doesn't take a degree in rocket science to figure why all of this is now beginning to spiral out of control, with serious consequences for our financial system and ability to cope with excessive national debt. Bahamian politicians remain hell bent on buying votes even if it means the destruction of the country; none of them are capable of pushing fiscal prudence as they can't tightening their belts ........just look at what happens to their own personal spending habits and waist lines once they get elected!

Posted 20 November 2013, 7:12 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment