Friday, November 29, 2013
By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Tribune Staff Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
JOHN Pinder, head of the National Congress of Trade Unions in the Bahamas (NCTUB), says he supports the government’s proposed move to cut out the practice of “double-dipping” for all civil servants.
Noting yesterday the Christie administration’s hard-pressed financial position, Mr Pinder said abolishing the custom is not only within the government’s right, but it ensures the security of civil servant’s salaries each month.
“I think that it (removing double-dipping for everyone) will be the fair thing to do,” Mr Pinder said, “because it is not right for one group to be able to do something while everyone else is not. Everything will be balanced as well. If they are going to discontinue one they need to discontinue all. “It’s unfortunate for those who have benefited from it for so long. I sympathise with employees as in these tough times people depend on the NIB benefits to help with their expenses when they are sick. “The government is within their right as an employer if they wish to with draw it. “It’s safer for the government to have money to pay salaries than for them to have to worry about salaries and paying out sick benefits.”
Speaking to The Tribune yesterday, Bahamas Electrical Workers Union (BEWU) president Stephano Green said union members have now committed themselves to working with the government in an effort to decide on the best decision. Green insisted that sick benefits were expected to be a part of those negotiations.
The pay out of NIB sick benefits at the same time as monthly salaries has remained in the spotlight since last month, but has taken centre stage while officials and the BEWU negotiate. However on Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis said officials will seek to remove “double dipping” not only for BEC workers, but for the entire civil service. The move will see a precedent set as it was previously stated that around 20,000 civil servants have participated in the long standing practice.
Mr Davis said the government, as the employer by law making contributions to NIB, only a certain portion of salary should be paid.
BEC Chairman Leslie Miller issued a corporation-wide memo in October telling staff they would no longer be allowed to collect from National Insurance for certain benefits, such as sick benefit, while being paid a full salary by BEC. It was to take effect on November 1. However, the workers will still receive the benefits while negotiations continue.
Comments
Onlooker says...
One of the Principles of Insurance is that the insured person can claim compensation only to the extent of actual loss. If the employee is being paid 100% of their wages by the employer, and addition pay would be Unjust Enrichment.
<P>
Section 22 of the National Insurance Act provides that every employer is entitled to withhold the payment of any wages for the purpose of ensuring that the aggregate of the wages does not exceed the amount of wages which would normally be payable.
Posted 29 November 2013, 3:43 p.m. Suggest removal
wave says...
Now you have to ask yourself, why would the prez of a union stand behide the government on this
issue. My guess, he's getting a sweet deal some where down the line, these guys would and will sell their mothers to make a fast buck.
Posted 29 November 2013, 5:13 p.m. Suggest removal
B_I_D___ says...
Word circulating is they are negotiating a bump in base pay to compensate for their 'lose in income' due to cutting the double dip.
Posted 29 November 2013, 5:53 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
If he agrees to that he is a fool plain and simple. He's on the verge of not being able to pay any salary much less NIB benefit.
How does someone get paid for sickness that hasn't occurred. How do you negotiate that figure? How do you know ahead of time how many days you will be sick in the year?
Posted 29 November 2013, 8:33 p.m. Suggest removal
concernedcitizen says...
I,m starting to wonder if it may actually save money to tell half the civil service to stay home .The employees could alternate .The government would save enormous amounts on electricity if the lights were off in half the offices //They would also save in fuel in gov cars i think even w/ still paying the half that stay home we would save by closing half the buildings ,and i don,t think the public would notice any drop in productivity ...lol
Posted 29 November 2013, 6:22 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment