Tuesday, October 1, 2013
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Democratic National Alliance’s (DNA) chairman yesterday suggested the “only way to survive” for his retail empire was downsize it to a single store, as he warned that Value-Added Tax (VAT) would “wipe out”the small business sector.
Andrew Wilson, who owns the Quality Business Centre (QBC), Radioshack franchise and several apparel stores, said Bahamas-based businesses likely faced a ‘double whammy’ from a VAT-induced increase in input costs and decline in consumer spending.
Noting the impact that a 15 per cent VAT levy would have on his commercial rental rates and insurance costs, Mr Wilson suggested the new tax would sap the entrepreneurial spirit and negatively impact a Bahamian retail industry where profit margins were relatively thin.
Suggesting that the private sector was “pretty much between a rock and a hard place”, Mr Wilson also questioned why the Government, in seeking to address its fiscal crisis, was refusing to tackle its excessive spending caused by a “bloated civil service”.
“As a retailer that has been suffering through this eight-year recession that we are in, I just think it’s going to wipe out, to a great extent, the small business sector and drive a substantial portion of our economy to the black market,” Mr Wilson told Tribune Business on VAT.
“The middle class and poor, who sustain this economy, will see a drastic cut in their disposable income just to live. The business sector is not going to be in a position to provide the salary increases in this economy that are needed to keep people’s heads above water.”
A major concern with the Government’s VAT proposal is that it will be inflationary, sparking a broad-based price increase across the Bahamian economy.
Apart from raising business costs, Mr Wilson’s fear - as expressed to this newspaper - is that reduced purchasing power and living standards, as a consequence of the price increases, will result in a drop in consumption and consumer spending. The end result: cost rises, and falling sales, which squeezes profitability.
“The one thing they do have some control over is the number of working hours,” Mr Wilson said of businesses, implying that some companies might respond to VAT by reducing working hours or staff count.
He operates six stores himself, and he told Tribune Business that a 15 per cent VAT would increase his collective $30,000 monthly rent payment by $3,500 to $33,500.
While the sale/lease of land and residential properties is VAT ‘exempt’, according to the Government’s ‘White Paper’, commercial real estate - such as Mr Wilson’s lease payments - is not.
And he expressed similar concern about the impact VAT would have on an electricity bill “10-12 times’ that of the US” (although the Government appears to be reconsidering this) and his businesses’ property insurance premiums.
“There is absolutely no way that a retailer can sustain these types of cost increase at the same time as the market he serves (consumers) will have a decline - a very real decline - in their spending power,” Mr Wilson told Tribune Business.
“I have a 12 year-old son. I will provide, but I can only survive by further downsizing. We’ve done a tremendous amount of downsizing in the last eight years. Maybe the future is to have one store, three-five employees and run a tight shop.”
Confirming that he would have to register to pay VAT, Mr Wilson used the hypothetical example of a retailer with a $110,000 annual turnover.
He explained that 50 per cent of that sum would be used on inventory purchases, leaving just $55,000 for rent, utilities payroll and government taxes.
“You still have a dream of an illusory profit, and it simply just cannot happen,” Mr Wilson told Tribune Business. “Cash flows have been cut in half by the recession.
“VAT will kill the goose that laid the golden egg, and there will be no one to produce the taxes they require.”
Calling on the Government to instead make “the hard decisions”, the DNA chairman urged it to also cut spending as part of fiscal reforms - not exclusively focus on extracting more money from everyone.
“We have a bloated, unproductive civil service that is a sacred cow,” he said.”With every change in government they bring in their generals, campaign workers and put them on the public payroll. That needs to stop.
“Further, all those who are getting pensions as well as salaries, they need to move on. Government must operate within the confines of its revenues. We are taxed out.”
Comments
justthefactsplease says...
Interesting insight. I agree that the government needs reduce its expenditure, much of which is waste, at the same time it is trying to improve its intake.
Posted 1 October 2013, 3:58 p.m. Suggest removal
TalRussell says...
Can the green party chairman see any conceivable way VAT can "help the economy" cause the government has to get it's hands on a better stream of money, or it will become even more bankrupt? Do you really think it will stop shoppers buying your stuff all because of VAT? Don't you have to leave electricity costs out of the equation as they're totally independent of the other? Would you not agree that with or without VAT, that if we allow energy costs to go unchecked, the economy will slowly be destroyed? The green party chairman is close to one of the very former cabinet ministers in the former regime who spent like crazy to get us to the VAT point. It would really do the green chairman lots of good not to bitch about something his own green leader helped put his struggling business empire in? PM Christie is the new kid on the block. The old one is up in Cooper's Town, with not a worry in the world?
AMEN!
Posted 1 October 2013, 4:21 p.m. Suggest removal
banker says...
Direct question -- Do you support the VAT initiatives? (My view -- if it were done intelligently it could work. However, there is not one intelligent person in the governing caucus.)
Posted 2 October 2013, 8:41 a.m. Suggest removal
John says...
> Blockquote
This government passed a tobacco tax that caused the price of cigarettes to double overnight and, at the same time made it a criminal offence to sell retail cigarettes. But the same law affected the price of expensive cigars by less than 40 cents. There may be serious revolt and even riots in this country shortly after the VAT is introduced. While the tax may mean a 15% increase in the cost of living expenses, it will have a more significant impact on poor and some middle class families, who are not now meeting their living expenses. Some businesses, who have not made profits since the recession hit in 2007-2008, will have to hire extra staff to do the accounting required for VAT. They may find that this is too burdensome and takes their companies too much further in the red and just decide to close their doors. So expect a violent disruption of the economy soon after the tax is introduced and expect that some goods and services may not be available. Then too government may be on the loosing end of its revenue when businesses close or there is a downturn in sales so they may find themselves operating in a greater deficit at least in the interim.
Posted 1 October 2013, 7:29 p.m. Suggest removal
banker says...
>so they may find themselves operating in a greater deficit at least in the interim.
That's the same conclusion that the Nassau Institute came to.
Posted 2 October 2013, 7:06 a.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Tal, I go to wikipedia, since I did not go to school.
> ******> A VAT, like most taxes, distorts what would have happened without it.***
> Because the price for someone rises the quantity of goods traded
> decreases. Correspondingly, some people are worse off by more than the
> government is made better off by tax income. That is, more is lost due to
> supply and demand shifts than is gained in tax. This is known as a
> deadweight loss. If the income lost by the economy is greater than the
> government's income; the tax is inefficient. It must be noted that a
> VAT and a Non-VAT has the same implications on the microeconomic
> model.
>
> The entire amount of the government's income (the tax revenue) may not be a
> deadweight drag, if the tax revenue is used for productive spending or has
> positive externalities – in other words, governments may do more than
> simply consume the tax income. While distortions occur, consumption taxes
> like VAT are often considered superior because they distort incentives to
> invest, save and work less than most other types of taxation – in other
> words, a VAT discourages consumption rather than production***.
Posted 2 October 2013, 8:29 a.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
Why is this DNA person talking about a 15 % VAT. when he should know it is 7 1/2 %, and does he have any suggestions as to how the Country can avoid another down grade.? The Country need solutions, and less fault finding. The Bahamas is deep in Debt. Thanks to their Papa.
Posted 26 November 2014, 3:04 p.m. Suggest removal
B_I_D___ says...
Don't worry Birdie...it will be 15% VERY VERY SOON...maybe even more as the economy tanks and the government doesn't get the revenue they were hoping for from a VERY bad tax idea.
Posted 26 November 2014, 3:37 p.m. Suggest removal
duppyVAT says...
This VAT thing will end up just like real property tax, customs duty, car licensing, NIB, etc. Bahamians are experts at dodging or cooking the numbers when it comes to taxes.
Posted 26 November 2014, 4:33 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment