Bishop Hall ,thats a good audition for the part of the cleric in the investigation , contact Mr Mitchell to go over your application for the post ..

that's all this human garbage is doing, auditioning for that spot. u are so right

Is this man sane?!?! The defence force officer's statement said that the detainees were being hit while providing **no provocation**, unlike Hall, the officer actually witnessed the episode. Did he look at the marks on that man's back? Who in their right mind would consider the first **slash** "reasonable" force? Gambling referendum sellout all over again.

More will come out and audition for the role of esteemed cleric . Seems there defences is going to be its was 2 hours of hand to hand combat to subdue the detainees although the RBDF out numbered them and had access to firearms .Next we will be told we did the humane thing by not opening fire while our guards were in grave danger ..lol

Yes the defense force has guns, are you saying they should have used them?

O wait nevermind, this is the typical political BS people post here.

I blame the Tribune too for this, because the Tribune did not balance this so-called preacher's comments about use of force with what the Defence Force officers themselves said, which was that the detainees they tortured put up no struggle or fight at all and that the detainees posed no threat to them either. WUTLESS MEDIA

the Tribune posted the reports about what the officers said ,even putting them next to a timeline of Mitchells statements , However your point is well taken many of the articles are badly written and the reporters don,t ask the pertinent questions.

Very curious concept of "reasonable"<img src="http://tinyurl.com/c7l9ck6" width="1">

Very curious concept of religion. This man is not religious or even a Christian. I am going to box the number 4,2 and 7 from Isaiah 42:7

starting at 42: 6
I the Lord have called thee in righteousness, and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles; To open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoners from the prison, and them that sit in darkness out of the prison house.

Jesus came to set the captives free, except for those frickin Cubans, and oh yeah... the Haitians too! Hall should be defrocked. I hope that there is a special fire in Hell for him, although I do not think that he is a believer.

Agreed

Agreed

At least it's good news that the good Comrade Bishop seems to have either voluntarily or been pushed from his lofty position of acting as the "archangel" for the numbers man's? Each time the Bishop opens his mouth to the media, I think he unknowingly teaches his fellow preacherman's colleagues, that no matter how high you say you sit next to God, ya's is still far from unassailable? Could this be a hint of just another preacherman's lobbing for appointments by the government or by the most wealthy amongst us?

Tals are you suggesting the Comrade preacherman may be singing for his supper ??

this "man" is a piece of garbage

About 10 years ago, this man started calling himself Bishop. The ironic thing was that the particular sect, church, whatever that he belonged to, didn't have the title of Bishop. I totally concur with your assessment.

interesting

This story and Rev. Hall's comments are nonsensical in two respects. The first is that the story lacks context. Rev. Hall mentions Cuban detainees and talks about how nothing is wrong with reasonable force. However, to my knowledge no government official has admitted to the use of any force, reasonable or unreasonable, against the Cuban detainees. So either Rev. Hall is speaking hypothetically and therefore not talking about this Cuban detainee issue or alternatively if he is talking about this specific Cuban detainee issue his statement about the use of force contradicts the government's position to date. The reporter should have put that into context particularly as he later states that the Opposition's position is premature. Additionally, the reporter should have asked Rev. Hall a standard follow-up question like "what is the difference between reasonable force and abuse", the answer to which would have made this story more relevant and forced Rev. Hall to be more specific or make a further fool of himself..

I wonder how the self-titled 'bishop' would enjoy being slapped around for a couple of hours - reasonable force being used! No answer or comment required.

Nothing wrong with these church men shutting their mouths and sticking to what they know.
Who asked Stupid Hall for his opinion on this issue?

I do respect the good Bishop but only when as a preacherman's, he's talk'in like a preacherman's and not as politician or some consultant.

The Bishop is an idiot. He should stick to carrying Nygard's bags!