Thursday, September 19, 2013
By NATARIO McKENZIE
Tribune Business Reporter
nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net
A senior International Monetary Fund (IMF) executive yesterday effectively backed the Bahamas’ decision to implement a Value-Added Tax (VAT) regime, describing it as a “very efficient” form of taxation.
While touting the benefits of VAT, which the IMF had recommended this nation implement, Alejandro Werner, director of the Fund’s Western Hemisphere Department, acknowledged the concerns over such tax reform.
To mitigate this, Mr Werner said the Government could choose to direct some of its VAT revenues towards needy segments of society via conditional cash transfer programmes or specific spending programmes dealing with areas such as education.
Speaking with Tribune Business following a presentation at the College of the Bahamas, Mr Werner explained: “We have seen the benefits of VAT around the world. I think the VAT is very efficient in its implementation.
“Its characteristic is basically one in which you tax the value added on at each stage of the processing of a product. It generates a lot of incentives for self-enforcement. That makes it a very efficient tax. It’s a tax that most modern tax systems have today.”
Mr Werner added: “Then it’s an issue on how to deal with any side effects through expenditures, through targeted programmes etc. That’s how countries have dealt with these issues.
“We have countries that have programmes where part of the collection goes towards the impact of the tax on the most needy segments of society through conditional cash transfer programmes.
“We have had other countries that have dealt with the specific expenditure programmes that deal with education etc. I think that’s the most efficient way to manage the concerns people might have, and that is what people have seen in other countries’ choices when they implemented a Value Added Tax.”
Mr Werner said VAT’s potential impact on the country’s fiscal turnaround position would depend on how the tax is implemented, the rate and the coverage.
He added that there were many countries that had seen simultaneous increases in growth while increasing taxation. “When it comes to tax reform, politically it’s very hard.
“However, at the level we are at here, we need to try and steer the discussion in that direction. One direction is how do we design the best tax structure for whatever level of tax collection we have.
“What’s the best tax system in terms of its efficiency and its capacity to administer? I think in that sense the evidence is very clear that a VAT is a very good tax. Another question is: What is the level of tax revenues that a country wants to have? I think that’s a much more complicated question,” said Mr Werner.
The Government is proposing to implement a VAT on July 1, 2014, at a rate of 15 per cent, with the hotel industry to be subject to a lower 10 per cent rate.
Companies with an annual turnover of $100,000 or less will be exempt from having to pay VAT.
Comments
My5Cents says...
No greater terrorist in the world than the IMF
Posted 19 September 2013, 2:28 p.m. Suggest removal
The_Oracle says...
“However, at the level we are at here, we need to try and steer the discussion in that direction".
Steer? the IMF has been driving the Bahamian bus towards the cliff for decades!
Another question is: "What is the level of tax revenues that a country wants to have?"
Enough so the public service and politicians can live high off the hog, give the most needy a few crumbs, and pillage the rest!!
Posted 19 September 2013, 3:14 p.m. Suggest removal
Reality_Check says...
As a US citizen who has resided in the Bahamas for many years, I can only simply laugh at how foolish Bahamian voters are. It is well known that the IMF, WTO, World Bank, IDB, OECD, etc. are all agencies in the main of US foreign policy tasked with destabilizing other countries whenever it is considered to be in the best economic or security interest of the US. The destabilization is typically accomplished by getting the country hooked on more foreign debt than it can possibly ever service. It is also often accomplished by forcing a country to replace its more cost efficient and more easily monitored/enforced taxation systems (like import duties in the case of the Bahamas) with other taxation systems that are not suitable for the country due to their revenue raising ineffectiveness, excessive costliness to administer (for both the government and taxpayers alike) and inability to be cost effectively enforced.
It is really all too easy in countries like the Bahamas with a largely poorly educated voting citizenry to get dimwitted greedy influence peddling politicians and their crony supporters (whether they be on the PLP or FNM side of the table) to "sell out" their country by sucking on the "borrowing tit" placed at their lips by self-interested foreign interests.
Posted 19 September 2013, 4:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment