Wednesday, December 10, 2014
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
Cable Bahamas warned regulators that their decision to impose price caps on its pay-TV and Internet services would be “ill-timed, intrusive and disproportionate”, arguing that these controls were unnecessary due to emerging competition.
The BISX-listed communications provider, in a December 30 submission to the Utilities Regulation and Competition Authority (URCA) that highlighted the differences between itself and the Bahamas Telecommunications Company (BTC), slammed the regulator’s chosen controls some give weeks before they were confirmed.
BTC backed the significant market power (SMP) remedy chosen by URCA, calling for price caps on fixed-line phone, broadband Internet and pay-TV retail services in direct contrast to its major rival.
Failing to dissuade URCA from its chosen course of action, the BISX-listed provider warned: “Cable Bahamas does not agree that price caps should be implemented on the retail broadband and pay-TV markets, and considers this to be an ill-timed, intrusive and disproportionate proposition....
“The extension of ex-ante (pre-event) price regulation in the retail pay-TV and broadband markets is not warranted. Both of these markets are either moving towards imminent competition, or are already subject to effective competition.
“These markets should, therefore, be candidates for deregulation (or, at the very least, lighter touch regulation), and not price cap regulation.”
Cable Bahamas added that URCA had provided no evidence that Bahamian consumers were facing “excessive pricing” in either the pay-TV or retail broadband markets.
“It has also ignored the fact that the presence of strong infrastructure competition constrains Cable Bahamas and BTC from engaging in excessive pricing practices in the broadband market,” Cable Bahamas argued, to no avail.
“The existence of infrastructure-based competition will have the same effect in the pay-TV market as soon as BTC’s new IPTV service is operational, which is expected to happen within the next six months.”
Rebutting BTC’s preference for price cap regulation, the BISX-listed provider said “the cost, complexity and significant lead times” required to develop a functioning price cap scheme made this method unsuitable for both the Bahamian Internet and [pay-TV markets.
Cable Bahamas is likely to be more unhappy than BTC over the outcome of the SMP consultation, as URCA has also prevented it from offering ‘product bundles’ that feature its Internet and pay-TV offerings, until it can demonstrate that similar deals can be offered by a competitor. BTC is only subject to such restrictions on its Internet services.
Elsewhere, Cable Bahamas also took issue with BTC’s assertion that including its IPTV product, which will launch in Bimini before year-end, in any analysis of the Bahamian pay-TV market was premature.
Arguing that market reviews should be ‘forward looking’ for 12-18 months, the BISX-listed provider said: “Cable Bahamas therefore contends that URCA must take into account the planned entry by BTC into the IPTV market over the course of the market review period....
“BTC’s failure to even discuss (or mention) its IPTV plans in its response to consultation is therefore hardly defensible, particularly given the recent publicity it has given to this issue.”
Tribune Business previously reported that URCA rejected Cable Bahamas’ assertion that the pay-TV market is easily accessible to new competitors, despite a survey showing 56 per cent of broadband Internet subscribers might sign up to BTC’s IPTV product.
The BISX-listed operator said BTC’s imminent market entrance with its IPTV (Internet Protocol) product meant competition would increase, with other countries exhibiting a “dynamic shift” towards this technology.
To support its arguments, Cable Bahamas conducted a consumer survey, which found that 19 per cent of broadband subscribers were either ‘likely’ or ‘very likely’ to switch to BTC’s IPTV. Another 37 per cent were ‘undecided’.
Rejecting Cable Bahamas’ survey, URCA noted that the remaining 44 per cent of broadband subscribers said they were either ‘unlikely’ or ‘very unlikely’ to make the switch to BTC’s IPTV.
“While it may be true that IPTV has led to dramatic changes in the market shares in the pay-TV market in other countries, BTC has not yet launched its IPTV services in the Bahamas, and URCA is not aware of any concrete plans of BTC or other licensees to launch these services in the immediate future,” the regulator added.
Comments
Greentea says...
The product quality at Cable Bahamas is quite poor. Based on that alone- the company should not be allowed to price gauge the bahamian people before competition arrives. BTC and Cable Bahamas should both cease to exist once competition is allowed in the market. We pay far too much for such a poor product and service.
Posted 10 December 2014, 2:04 p.m. Suggest removal
Well_mudda_take_sic says...
$30 dollars a month for the most basic of TV channels from Cable Bahamas that essentially constitute garbage programs for Bahamian consumers. Thank heavens URCA is fulfilling its vital role in protecting us from this predatory price gauging enterprise that has done nothing but sought to abuse the monopoly originally given to it by the Bahamian people. Competition is desperately needed to keep the abusive practices of Cable Bahamas in check!
Posted 10 December 2014, 3:03 p.m. Suggest removal
WETHEPEOPLE says...
Whatelse is new with the stealing cable Bahamas. They have been stealing satellite services from direct TV for years and selling it off to it's consumers. They claim to pay licensing fees to channels in order to broadcast their services, but I know full well that that's not the case for all channels. Hidden on the roof of their corporate building are small satelites which they use to pirate TV stations, and then try and sell them over to unknowing bahamains. Talk about reconnection fee! Fourty dollars to press a button to reactivate my cable service, utterly ridiculous. How can my reconnection fee be more than my monthly basic cable service? Robbery without a gun I say!!! Whiles cable Bahamas executives are carrying home annual bonuses in excess of three hundred thousand dollars each, its local staff can barely see a pay increase beyond twenty five cents an hour! This is total shame! You would think that they would at least share the stolen pie some, I guess not! Cable Bahamas should be tagged and bagged and sent back on its way to Canada from where it came! They should no longer be allowed to rob the Bahamian people with exhorbarant late fees and reconnection fees, especially for such poor and unentertaining services.
So shall it B!
Posted 10 December 2014, 5:05 p.m. Suggest removal
UserOne says...
If Cable Bahamas had not given such appallingly bad service all this time, they would not have to worry about competition. I have been waiting years for a competitor so I would no longer have to put up with the disgraceful service at Cable Bahamas.
Posted 10 December 2014, 5:13 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment