Mitchell questions courts on immigration sentencing

By KHRISNA VIRGIL

Tribune Staff Reporter

kvirgil@tribunemedia.net

DESPITE the government’s policy change to ensure harsher penalties for breaches of the Immigration Act, Foreign Affairs and Immigration Minister Fred Mitchell said there are concerns that the changes have not been reflected in sentencing by the courts.

Mr Mitchell was responding to questions fielded by Free National Movement shadow minister Hubert Chipman over the security of the country’s borders in the face of global terrorist attacks.

“The country should know that the immigration law has been amended to increase the penalties for offences under the Immigration Act,” Mr Mitchell said.

“Another concern is that the penalties that are being imposed in the courts do not seem to reflect the policy change made by the government when the law was amended to provide for more severe penalties.”

Mr Mitchell added that the government has also implemented several other strategies to ensure the country’s safety and security.

“The Bahamas government constantly reviews all matters relating to intelligence and security at the borders from time to time. The country should know that this occurs regularly. All the heads of the law enforcement agencies meet regularly to exchange information and make joint plans. There is a constant exchange of information at both a national and international level.

“The country should know that the immigration law has been amended to increase the penalties for offences under the Immigration Act.

“The country should know that $18m dollars is being invested in a new border management system. This will mean new passports, new electronic procedures for entry into the Bahamas and the ability to exchange information accords various law enforcement databases.

“The country should know that the Bahamas has signed on to the APIS system which allows the exchange of valuable information on passenger traffic into the Bahamas.”

He said legislation will be introduced shortly so that this system can go live and that there have been successful prosecutions under the new laws for harbouring illegal immigrants and for assisting illegal landing.

“Repatriations continue unabated. What concerns the government, however, is that the opposition is unable to restrain its friends in the activist community who seem intent on tying up the courts in frivolous and vexatious litigation, racking up unnecessary court costs to prove points that are not exactly earth shattering in law.

He continued: “This together with the international cries of wolf by their activist friends are cause for concern. Their activist friends spread alarm in this country and abroad and unwittingly – we hope – provide cover for people who are engaged in these criminal enterprises bringing illegals in and through this country.

“It would be appropriate for the opposition spokesman to use his influence to ask their activist friends to cease and desist with this,” Mr Mitchell said.

On Monday, Mr Chipman said while the national security threat of illegal immigration is not something new to Bahamians, the issue raises humanitarian concerns such as the exploitation and deaths of many migrants, often drowned at sea or who die from dehydration and other causes during dangerous sea voyages.

He also said that the global increase in terrorist activity and attacks raise added concerns about border security, especially for a far-flung archipelagic nation such as the Bahamas.

Comments

TruePeople says...

Judge says follow the law in legal / criminal proceedings, particularly with regards to immigration or for those of uncertain national status.... Freddy say screw that....

Then turn around and criticize the justice system for not being HARSH enough.... and further tries to turn the whole thing political by suggesting that STB and FNM are aligned in some kind of anti-governmental, anti-Bahamian conspiracy....

At the end of the day it's only people like freddy boy dem who make this country look bad

I wish these bey dem would work as much as they talk... we'd be a first world nation

Posted 2 December 2015, 1:40 p.m. Suggest removal

My2cents says...

The immigration department website says that currently these persons are detained at CRDC, and are not under arrest. If they follow criminal procedures they should also house them at Fox Hill prison prior to being charged, and as they await repatriation.

Posted 2 December 2015, 1:46 p.m. Suggest removal

TruePeople says...

Detention centres are for people awaiting a court date, but have not been charged yet.

Prison is obviously for those charged of a criminal offence.

Either way you get arrested.... people don't go in there for the fun of it

Posted 2 December 2015, 2:05 p.m. Suggest removal

My2cents says...

"Detention centres are for people awaiting a court date, but have not been charged yet."

You said it...now that they are required to be treated as criminals and charged they should be housed where the other criminals go to await being charged. I'm sure the detention center is not fun, but surely less harsh than fox hill and mothers and children are provided with better accommodations.

Posted 2 December 2015, 8:36 p.m. Suggest removal

TruePeople says...

Ok bro. You're saying skip the courts and just lock up people on the assumption of criminality. Have fun with that idea, i'm sure it's a great one, and maybe what Freddy wants at the end of the day...

Posted 3 December 2015, 9:51 a.m. Suggest removal

My2cents says...

No I'm saying they are criminals, lock them up with the rest.

Posted 3 December 2015, 9:35 p.m. Suggest removal

GrassRoot says...

last time I checked the government had not released its policies in a form that would be binding upon a judge.

Posted 2 December 2015, 2:08 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment