Monday, December 21, 2015
By NICO SCAVELLA
Tribune Staff Reporter
nscavella@tribunemedia.net
A LEADING surgeon has warned that the current model of National Health Insurance will create a “huge problem” in soliciting productivity from private physicians and could foster behaviour “that resembles the typical civil servant”.
Dr Duane Sands, a cardiothoracic surgeon and former Free National Movement senator, said turning private healthcare professionals into “employees of the state” would ultimately promote a “clock-watching” mentality among healthcare practitioners. He said such an attitude is anti-ethical to the ideals of good doctoring and prevalent among some trade union members.
Dr Sands added that if physicians are stripped of their “professional autonomy” they will no longer strive to “go the extra mile” in providing quality healthcare for patients, which he suggested will ultimately undermine the core purpose of universal healthcare coverage in the country, which is to provide quality, affordable access to healthcare for all Bahamians.
“You now make physicians employees of the state, no different from any other civil servant, and you’re going to start to see an increasing level of behaviour that resembles the typical civil servant,” Dr Sands said during a recent interview.
“The idea of personal autonomy or professional autonomy is a very important thing when you’re talking about doctors, lawyers, architects, accountants, etc. When you make those professionals civil servants across the board, now you have really created a huge problem in productivity.”
Dr Sands predicted that there will likely be a “honeymoon period” for physicians, a two-year period during which doctors will be presented with an “inducement” that will suggest that working under NHI trumps being a private physician. However, he said things will go “rapidly downhill” once the realities of budget adjustments and the “financing nightmare” surrounding NHI sets in.
According to Dr Sands, primary care physicians, as well as nurses working in the private sector, have tentatively been promised $36,000 per annum under NHI. The specialist doctors he said have been promised $100,000.
As it stands, every consultant doctor makes basically the same wage: $48,000 per annum, in addition to an “on-call allowance” of $12,000 per year, according to Dr Sands.
Physicians with consultant status have the capacity to bill patients in the private sector, thus varying the salaries that those physicians may earn, he said.
However, Dr Sands said that the NHI model that government is currently contemplating will also mandate physicians to see patients on average for three 15-minute sessions per year, regardless of the reasons for the visit, essentially outfitting private physicians with a fixed salary and fixed range of responsibilities and “autonomy”.
However, the irony in such a proposal, Dr Sands explained, is that while what is proposed is more than what the average Bahamian currently enjoys and/or receives, it is “dramatically worse than what people who currently have insurance are getting.”
“So what we’re saying is, that in this social redistribution experiment now, we’re not going to raise the average Bahamian up to the level of private healthcare; we’re going to bring everybody down to an unacceptable level,” he said.
“And as a consequence now, in exchange for saying that we have equity – wonderful word – and parity, another wonderful word, and access, the fact that you have to wait three months or six months or nine months to get it, well that’s only fair.”
Dr Sands said the government will likely employ a “divide and conquer” strategy in trying to convince physicians to sign onto NHI, starting with the primary care physicians before tackling the more “truculent” specialists, thus “boxing in” the latter group.
“They can get past the employers, they can get past the insurance companies, but what they cannot get past is the doctors,” Dr Sands said. “But fundamentally, the negotiation where a contract is put to the doctors to say ‘are you prepared to do this, are you prepared to work this way, are you prepared to change your professional behaviour because you agree that this is the right thing to do,’ the only way that physicians would be prepared to do that is if they agree within their heart that what is being done is indeed in the best interests of Bahamians.
“This becomes a very difficult thing for the government, because on the one hand they say ‘thank you for your service,’ but then on the other hand they call you a ‘greedy doctor’.”
NHI will be phased in over a five-year period, officials have said.
The first phase involves registration and improvement in public health infrastructure.
Comments
Honestman says...
Bahamian doctors can stop this farce dead in its tracks by refusing to sign up. For sure, the country needs to do more for those without health cover but destroying the private health sector is NOT the way forward. The sensible approach would be to allow people to choose between keeping their private cover or signing up for NHI. Most if not all private health cover holders would elect to remain in the private sector. Government could then focus on providing a product for the rest of the population that is funded by increased NIB contributions (but with increases pitched at an equitable level). Why are Christie and the PLP so hard headed about this? Saving face seems to be the only thing that matters to them. They don't realize that there is nothing they can do now to persuade voters to give them another term come May 2017. That being so, why not just do what is best for the country.
Posted 21 December 2015, 11:08 a.m. Suggest removal
Islandgirl says...
He has successfully destroyed almost every private industry this lap, with the exception of the accounting and legal professions. What an utter disgrace of a human being. Nothing is free perry, and when our best leave because you are essentially forcing them into slavery, what then? Just go man. Go.
Posted 21 December 2015, 5:10 p.m. Suggest removal
TruePeople says...
Very true. Even in Canada that has had public healthcare (funded through mandatory taxes), people who can afford to avoid the over burdened healthcare system get private coverage. They're still paying for the public sector healthcare, but are personally paying extra for private care
Posted 21 December 2015, 2:12 p.m. Suggest removal
newcitizen says...
The biggest difference is that the Canadian government has transparency. Tax dollars are accounted for so the Health Care system runs with decent efficiency. Here there is no transparency and there is no accounting for tax dollars in anyway. The governments of the Bahamas have proven time and time again that they have no issue with stealing money from the public. Any public health care in this country is doomed from the start because we lack leaders with any kind of ethical backbone. The money will be stolen and our health care system will be no better than it is now.
This is just another one of PGC's get rich quick schemes.
Posted 21 December 2015, 2:53 p.m. Suggest removal
Alex_Charles says...
Harper's government wasn't the kings of transparency. They were littered in a few scandals, the most notable being the JSF where billions were spent on a defense program that saw no transparent review, it was an under the table deal. Hence one of the reason he got voted out.
But with that being said, their government is still more transparent that our.... Teachable ministers
Posted 21 December 2015, 8:25 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment