Friday, February 13, 2015
By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Tribune Staff Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
BAHAMAS Communications and Public Officers Union (BCPOU) President Bernard Evans yesterday said that his organisation is “vehemently” opposed to two of the three companies that are vying for the country’s second mobile network provider licence.
Mr Evans said the BCPOU will not throw its support behind television and Internet provider Cable Bahamas or regional telecommunications company Digicel.
However, he told The Tribune the union would research Virgin Mobile, the third company that wants to operate in The Bahamas.
Mr Evans added that the “cutting edge” character of Virgin Mobile’s founder Richard Branson impressed him. But he was quick to explain that this was not the union’s official statement of support.
“The government never officially had word with us,” Mr Evans said, “so we were kept abreast of everything that was happening with persons who were close to the process and they gave us updates. But there was never any direct communication with the union.
“I can’t come out and emphatically say who we are supporting, but I’ll say this. We definitely don’t support Digicel and we are not supporting Cable Bahamas.”
He said this position was based on the BCPOU’s view that Digicel does not respect the right of employees to join a union.
Concerning Cable Bahamas, Mr Evans said the union has been trying for 20 years to get the company to join them at the negotiating table over an industrial agreement for its employees.
“They (Digicel) do not respect basic fundamental rights and they will not allow workers to organise. That is our fundamental right. That is our challenge with Digicel. They just don’t like it and we will emphatically oppose them.
“As for Cable Bahamas . . .there is a revolving door at Cable. This union has been trying to get them to the table to negotiate for 20 years. They believe they can treat employees however they want to and it would be okay.
“We know the modus operandi of both companies and so we are vehemently opposing a licence to either of them.”
During the mid-year budget communication in the House of Assembly on Wednesday, Prime Minister Perry Christie revealed that the government is on target to announce the successful applicant for the country’s second mobile network provider licence in May.
He said the Cellular Liberalisation Task Force formed last April has drafted transaction documents to govern a partnership with the government. It would allow for a 49 per cent, 51 per cent ownership split.
The prime minister said the government has a requirement for the new cellular company to have “broad Bahamian ownership”.
“Mr Speaker, (this) is yet another testament of my government’s commitment to ensuring that all Bahamians benefit from the economic fruits of the country and not just a select and privileged few,” Mr Christie said on Wednesday.
“It is also the fulfilment of the promise made by my government in its Charter for Governance to empower Bahamians by expanding their role as investors in the Bahamian economy, including the telecommunications industry,” Mr Christie said.
Wednesday marked the deadline for companies to respond to the government’s request for proposals (RFP) process.
Comments
ThisIsOurs says...
Hmmm... I wonder whose interest is really being served with this announcement. Digicel has a good name throughout the entire Caribbean
Posted 13 February 2015, 3:29 p.m. Suggest removal
legend_eleuthera says...
There are many ways to counter unions. Ignoring them doesn't work but by working within the law, union activity can be excluded at the gate. What ways utilised by union recruiters that they deem fair for their closed shop actions is fair against their weaseling into an employer/employee relationship that closes the unions out.
Posted 13 February 2015, 4:08 p.m. Suggest removal
realfreethinker says...
Who gives a shit who he support. He can't oppose a new company. This is not btc where they have their paws in. He opposed C&W because they were buying into the company hie union represented. Screw him
Posted 13 February 2015, 4:50 p.m. Suggest removal
GrassRoot says...
Unions oppose change, whenever it hurts them. So lets implement change.
Posted 13 February 2015, 4:57 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
Bahamian Unions just want members, to pay dues (the leaders salary) and don't think long term.
A classic example is the UAW in the United States. They fought the auto manufactures on automation. Chrysler went into bankruptcy and had to be bailed out while Volkswagen became a major global player.
In Germany the unions pension funds were invested in Volkswagen and they had representation on the board. They agreed to the lay off of 70,000 at the time. Today they have many more members in a much larger company.
Posted 13 February 2015, 10:57 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment