Private sector fears BEC reform process being compromised

By NATARIO McKENZIE

Tribune Business Reporter

nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net

and By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The private sector fears the Government may have compromised the integrity of the Bahamas Electricity Corporation (BEC) reform process by renewing contacts with groups that either did not participate or were rejected from the bidding at an early stage.

Gowon Bowe, the Bahamas Chamber of Commerce and Employers Confederation’s (BCCEC) chairman, questioned whether the BEC process had been re-opened after Prime Minister Perry Christie let slip last week that the Government had been talking to Emera and BISX-listed FOCOL Holdings again.

Grand Bahama Power Company’s majority shareholder had been part of a consortium, together with FOCOL and Wartsila, that had offered to construct a new power station for New Providence under a build/own/operate arrangement with BEC. Emera would have provided the management, FOCOL, the fuel, and Wartsila, the generators.

However, Franklyn Wilson, FOCOL’s chairman, previously confirmed to Tribune Business that the Emera/FOCOL group had elected not to participate in the formal BEC restructuring process, instead choosing to hold itself out as an independent power producer (IPP) to whichever bidder won.

Mr Bowe said the renewed talks between the Government and Emera/FOCOL had created confusion in the private sector, given that there had been no formal announcement confirming the BEC process was over.

Tribune Business contacts have suggested it is highly improper, and irregular, for the Government to be talking to non-participants and rejects from the BEC reform process without confirming it has ended - and no bidder deemed suitable.

This newspaper can also reveal that the Government has not confined itself to talking to Emera/FOCOL. For Tribune Business sources revealed that US-based Ludvig Electric, which was rejected from the BEC process at an early stage by the Government’s advisers, KPMG, was due to meet with Prime Minister Perry Christie and his team on Friday morning - ironically, just before the longest (and worst) BEC blackout in memory.

This newspaper’s sources said Ludvig’s Bahamian ‘point person’ is Grand Bahama-based Glen Lowe. They added that it was grossly unfair to those companies still ‘in’ the BEC process for the Government to be speaking to the likes of Ludvig and Emera/FOCOL without confirming that the process was over, and their bids deemed unsuitable.

Carolinas-based Power Secure was viewed as the only remaining player for what would be a ‘management contract’ to operate BEC, but it is understood to have heard nothing from the Government. As a result, it has moved on to assess other projects, and adopted the attitude: ‘Call us when you need us’.

“Put them out of their misery,” one source told Tribune Business in relation to the bidders. “Let’s end the process, move on and deal with the most challenging issue in this country - the cost of energy. Dealing with it would increase business and employment opportunities, and have an impact on crime.”

Tribune Business understands that KPMG is concentrating on putting together the ‘rate reduction’ bond, which would refinance BEC’s existing $450-$550 million debt and liabilities, while it waits for the Government to reach decision on how it will move the Corporation’s restructuring forward.

Sources familiar with the BEC process told Tribune Business that bidders have spent millions on doing due diligence, and putting together business plans, for the restructuring. And they suggested there were signs already that the Government and BEC were taking the ‘best bits’ from the bidders’ tender submissions, in a bid to develop and execute their own ‘solutions’.

Mr Bowe, meanwhile, said the private sector has been left wondering whether or not a firm has been selected. “It is unclear whether the agreement has been stalled by the Prime Minister because of some of the negative publicity that has arisen with Power Secure, or whether they are still in deliberation,” he added.

“Over the past two weeks it was very interesting for the private sector to see the Prime Minister make reference to Emera and the

FOCOL group, and the question would arise as to whether we are actually opening the bidding process again for entities who either did not participate originally or didn’t make it through to the qualifying round.

“That raises questions over the overall process. It is important to ensure that there is a fair and equitable process, and that it is

transparent with a proper audit trail, so that persons can understand the rationale so that, at the end of the day, there is no question over the validity of the process and the judgment that went into it, even if persons disagree with the choice.”

Mr Bowe added: “There needs to be clarity in terms of when things will transpire. It can no longer be imminent. The terms ‘imminent’ and ‘shortly’ are concerning because every day that passes and we are not able affect this situation, it has a cost to the business community.

“There is a tremendous amount of financial resources being tied up in energy costs that could be released into more productive areas of spending, and could lead to greater growth in our economy.

“These type of events highlight the need for the reform process to be expedited, and there needs to be clarity and communication from the Government as to where the process actually sits. Is there a chosen bidder, and others are now being allowed to enter a process that was originally deemed closed, or is there an open process, meaning no party had been selected and they have allowed others to enter from the perspective that they could more efficient?” he added.

“We want it to be an equitable process because our international reputation still remains, and while all of the players will have international connections we would not want to be seen as cherry picking or carrying out a process that would favour one party over the other. There is great desire to see energy security laid at the forefront so we can release tangible dollars into the community.”

Friday’s island-wide ‘black-out’ has underscored why the BEC reform process needs to be ‘expedited’, Mr Bowe said, urging the Government to clarify the status of the reform process and when it would be brought to a conclusion.

He added that for the private sector, the cost of energy and the instability of its supply was effectively a “double whammy” for

businesses.

Mr Bowe’s comments came on the heels of the second major island wide black-out in less than 10 months. A “fire in the trenches” at the Blue Hills power station caused a massive power outage across New Providence on Friday afternoon, leading to supply disruptions throughout the weekend for thousands of consumers.

“One of the most damaging aspects for business in recent items has been the cost of energy and instability in energy,” the BCCEC chairman said. “For businesses it comes as a double whammy. Electricity bills are extremely high due to the inefficiencies at BEC, and the cost of fuel is not helping the situation.

“Even after such high bills, businesses are suffering losses because of damaged equipment, and business interruptions because of an unstable energy supply. From that perspective, the overall reform process is designed effectively to cover those concerns by looking at the modernisation of the equipment being used and bringing the Corporation itself back to financial stability - where the price of fuel can actually be reduced.

“The Chamber and the private sector is very much in tune with what is taking place with the reform process. The principal criticism

is not so much the time that it has taken but the lack of communication and what I would call keeping the public abreast of the actual

progress.”

The Government has moved away from splitting BEC into separate generation and transmission and distribution (T&D) arms, as

initially proposed in August 2013, and is instead moving forward with a business model that mirrors the Nassau Airport Development Company’s (NAD) arrangement for Lynden Pindling International Airport’s (LPIA) management.

Under that arrangement, the Government will retain 100 per cent equity ownership of BEC even after the private sector manager is in place.

Comments

Mayaguana34 says...

Any deal that includes heavy fuel oil and FOCOL is a step in the wrong direction and will ensure that no progress comes quickly

Posted 16 March 2015, 1:53 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

Better than the Chinese ................... they still depend on coal as their main fuel source

Posted 16 March 2015, 2:48 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

Emera could solve our electricity problems. They have already done it in grand Bahama where they built a new power plant in 2012, which because of increased efficiency reduced electricity bills and greatly reduced blackouts. The fuel surcharge this month for grand Bahama power company is less than 13 cents. The new plant has turbines that can run on natural gas which is the cleanest fossil fuel available. Emera has plans to ship natural gas to grand Bahama shortly, which will further reduce electricity bills and lead to a cleaner environment.

Posted 16 March 2015, 2:58 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

And then go find out the details about the new generation plant at Emera ...... and why that is really a bad investment for them. To use natural gas requires a large generation plant that can use a large volume , not a little plant that is set up to serve 40,000 people.

We need a big generation plant that can cable link to every island like BTC OR just buy friggin electricity from Florida Power & Light ............ its cheaper.

Posted 16 March 2015, 3:18 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

I doubt you are correct. Grand Bahama has a customer base of only 19,500 customers. Emera is a very profitable multi billion dollar company with power plants in numerous countries. I trust their expertise better than yours. Natural gas can be done profitably and will be done so in grand Bahama shortly. It is no panacea, but is much cheaper and environmentally friendly than oil.

Posted 16 March 2015, 3:37 p.m. Suggest removal

The_Oracle says...

Emera is no savior, while the fuel surcharge does fluctuate the base rate is still high.
Being guaranteed a minimum 10% return on investment by the so called regulator (GBPA) does not help, and providing the dirtiest power in the region, destroying equipment on a regular basis.

Posted 16 March 2015, 3:29 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

It is much better than anything BEC has provided, or likely to anytime soon. The base rate is @ 20 cents per kWh, so currently total of just under 33 cents. 3 cents of the base rate is to pay for the construction of the new plant. When this is paid for the base rate will be reduced accordingly. It is not as cheap as we want but very good given the limitations of small economies of scale and with the soon introduction of natural gas will be better for the environment of grand Bahama.

Posted 16 March 2015, 3:42 p.m. Suggest removal

The_Oracle says...

Still a rip off @ 33 cents/Kwh esp. while burning duty free (bonded) fuel!
While Natural Gas has potential who do you think will pay for the infrastructure?
The customers!
Just like paying for the new plant.
GB power is a profit center, with an incompetent Regulator.
The power is erratic, destroys motors, the phase angle is whacked,
Remember the rate structure change? GBPA let them put the whole fuel cost into the surcharge, and shifted their % (cut) from fuel oil burned to Kwh produced.
What you're saying is in effect a rotten apple is better than a rotten Banana.
Meanwhile neither port nor Emera want to allow private Alternate energy, irrespective of the national energy policy.

Posted 16 March 2015, 4:41 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

We would like it to be cheaper than 33 cents of course but given the limitations ( lack of economies of scale, added expense on an island Importing fuel etc) is it accurate to characterize it as a rip off ? I do not think so, there is a limit to how cheap electricity can be produced given our drawbacks. As for the customer paying for the plant, this was a win/ win situation. The new plant was more efficient so even with the addition of the 3 cents to cover costs, the overall cost to the consumer was still reduced compared to rates with the old plant. Also the new plant is more environmentally friendly which is a plus. The short is nothing is for free and this is a better banana than before, and probably the best given the circumstances. Also with the newer plant there were far fewer disruptions to power, this is an incontrovertible fact, leading to better service.

Posted 16 March 2015, 4:53 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

What is the electricity rate per kwh in Canada or Florida DonAnthony?????????? Don't make excuses for Emera/GBPA. This is how ALL foreign entities (banks, foodchains, airlines, luxury services etc) treat Bahamians ............................... extra markups on their base/guaranteed profits

Posted 16 March 2015, 7:13 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

Please stop making ignorant, insular, antiquated, generalizations about ALL foreigners, this is not the 19 th century and educate yourself. The U.S. Is about 12 cents per kwhr. Have you heard of economies of scale??????? How can you compare a utility with a million customers to one with less than 20,000. It is simple economics. They have nuclear power in south Florida do you want that in the Bahamas? I thought not. As for guaranteed profits it is the best model. Utilities will not invest in such a capital intensive industry without an assurance of a return on their investment. Without it you will have what grand Bahama was before emera, an old declining inefficient plant starving for maintenance and capital.

Posted 16 March 2015, 7:42 p.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

You are just confirming what I said in my post ................ thanks

Posted 17 March 2015, 10:45 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment