Mystery of the BTC Foundation

EDITOR, The Tribune.

In a recent letter to another newspaper, Bradley Roberts, Chairman of the PLP, in listing the accomplishments of his party, extolled its success in getting BTC back in Bahamian hands. In a transaction announced with great fanfare early in 2014, we were told that Government never intended to take operational management control of BTC but that the nation acquired a majority economic interest in the company, at no cost.

I have always been curious how this was done. It seems clear that Cable&Wireless Communications (CWC), which had owned 51 per cent of the shares, gave up roughly two per cent. But to whom exactly were these shares transferred? All the publicity, then and later, emphasised that these shares were not taken by Government itself to become an official state holding, but were assigned to a Bahamian “foundation” in trust for the Bahamian people. One specific purpose was mentioned —helping the Bahamas Broadcasting Corporation gain more technical expertise in its operations. This arrangement was praised as a brilliant compromise achieved after months of negotiations by the special committee headed by Franklyn Wilson.

Strangely, nothing further has been heard about this foundation. Any true foundation is created by a formal trust deed that sets forth its founder, its name, its objectives and the nature of its beneficiaries, and names its Board of Trustees, who provide periodic reports of its activities and bequests and its financial condition. To my knowledge, none of this information has been published. I was informally told that its Chairman is Wendell Major, Secretary to the Cabinet, but when I called his office, a functionary there told me he was “unable to give any information” about the foundation.

Why the secrecy about a body with such estimable aims? One is left with doubts about whether the foundation is actually in existence and is performing any useful functions. Unless these matters are clarified, the public will be entitled to its suspicions about who precisely is holding the two per cent shares and enjoying the benefits of dividends and a capital value of possibly $20m (a guess since BTC financial statement are buried within the consolidated figures of CWC).

A much more direct way to give Bahamians a stake in BTC would be a public offering of, say, 20 per cent of the company’s equity, taking shares equally from the Government and the CWC holdings. Disclosure rules would require the full story of last year’s Bahamianisation.

RICHARD COULSON

Nassau,

May 17, 2015.

Comments

proudloudandfnm says...

I think this deal fell apart and Perry is just too embarrassed to tell us....

But one thing we know for sure.

There is no BTC foundation.

And possibly....

Those two percent shares are still with CWC....

Whatever happened the government is keeping it secret.....

Posted 18 May 2015, 12:34 p.m. Suggest removal

MajorTom says...

Why do I have to look to a letter to the Editor, or the comments section of a major newspaper to find this question, or a speculative answer?
Does this newspaper not employ journalists?
If there are any journalists working here, could you please rise beyond letting others do your work for you, and do what needs to be done to answer this question?

Posted 18 May 2015, 3:55 p.m. Suggest removal

asiseeit says...

The people that write for newspapers in this country are not fool enough to "dig" into a story. They know that victimization and political goons are still alive and well in The Bahamas. With the amounts of money these politicians are receiving and the added "benefit's" these corrupt, immoral, unethical, greed bags, will do whatever is necessary to stay in power. It is a very dangerous game to expose them, and the reporters know this. Political party's in the Bahamas are our organized crime rackets, they protect one another, have a code of silence, have secret membership, and it is all about the money. Cross them at your peril.

Posted 18 May 2015, 4:40 p.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

The creation of the Foundation to hold a 2% non-voting equity stake in BTC was unlawful from the get go and should never have been advised by Sean McWeeney who's intellectual capabilities have always been seriously compromised from reading extensively the great writings of others without scholarly guidance in interpreting their views. Sean may mean well but he has a bent moral compass clouded by his own imperfect or incomplete interpretation of the works of many great philosophers. And any reasonable person knows that a confused misguided mind is a dangerous mind willing to do the bidding of any leadership figure who may knock at his door. That describes Sean McWeeney in a nut shell! As for Franky Wilson's role in the creation of the illegal Foundation, well, let's just say Snake did what he does best....bully the opposition with political leverage to gain an unfair advantage and then mouth off like no one else can adding whatever spin he feels works best for his own interests in the long term.

Posted 18 May 2015, 9:07 p.m. Suggest removal

EasternGate says...

You guys are on your game! Wish I could buy you all a drink at happy-hour!

Posted 19 May 2015, 9 a.m. Suggest removal

duppyVAT says...

Is all this money that BTC shelling out for Carnival and IAAF and Carifta etc part of the 2% Foundation????????? Who will confirm this......... Leon or the Miami office or Perry?????????

Posted 19 May 2015, 10:21 a.m. Suggest removal

proudloudandfnm says...

No Duppy they are not. The Foundation is not in existence yet. So it has and can do nothing. Nothing about this 2% take back has been done. I truly think the deal fell apart and Perry is just too embarrassed to tell us.

I always wondered how CWC could just give up shares. If I were a shareholder I'd have taken it to court to stop it....

Posted 19 May 2015, 11:52 a.m. Suggest removal

Reality_Check says...

If the creation of the Foundation was unlawful as Well_mudda_take_sic points out above, then it stands to reason that it never could have come into existence and therefore, as you say, it does not exist.

Posted 19 May 2015, 2:13 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment