Health broker elimination is ‘totally crazy’

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Bahamas Insurance Brokers Association’s (BIBA) president yesterday branded plans by the Government’s National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme to eliminate them, and their value-added role, as “totally, totally crazy”.

Felicia Knowles questioned why the Christie administration, and its Sanigest Internacional consultants, were seemingly hell-bent on removing “something that works” in favour of ‘one-size fits all’ healthcare financing and a publicly-owned insurer.

She argued that Bahamian brokers performed a vital role in terms of “transparency and checks and balances”, ensuring clients received the correct health insurance plan and designing benefits packages tailored to their needs.

And the BIBA president said brokers had in some cases reduced 100 per cent-plus loss ratios (where claims exceed premium income) on employer-sponsored plans to 60 per cent or less, proof of the ‘value added’ service provided by intermediaries.

Yet Sanigest, the ‘architects’ of the Government’s NHI proposal, this summer told Tribune Business that the scheme would effectively eliminate any role for Bahamian insurance brokers when it came to health coverage.

It even suggested that brokers might have to find a new role, such as certifying and verifying that healthcare facilities were up to the standards demanded by NHI.

This position was reiterated in the recently-revealed PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report on NHI, which revealed how Sanigest believes the Bahamas can contain growth in healthcare costs by eliminating “unnecessary expenditure”. Top of Sanigest’s list is the “millions paid to brokers”.

Effectively arguing that such a position was ‘short-sighted’, Ms Knowles said PwC’s review of Sanigest’s report “found fundamental major gaps they could not validate”.

Yet she argued that the Government was “continuing on course” as if the PwC report did not exist, given that it gave 100 per cent backing to all the NHI concerns raised by BIBA and other health industry stakeholders from the get-go.

“Are you health economists or are you here to fulfill an agenda,” she asked of the Costa Rican consultants.

Ms Knowles also queried how Sanigest could be chosen “to build” NHI in terms of a scheme that will actually be implemented, since as health economists it did not seem to have the required skill set.

“Brokers serve a purpose,” she told Tribune Business. “They bring transparency, and checks and balances, for health insurance products. If you want to remove the one thing that people rely on to confirm the product they are getting is what they wanted, it leaves a lot of room for error.

“As a broker, even if a company is purchasing a group plan, we are doing serious work to get the employees to sign up for health insurance. When you think it takes one or two days, it’s going to take months.”

The latter reference is to the Government’s and Sanigest’s expectation that around 85 per cent of the legal, resident population will be registered and signed-up for NHI by April 2016 - within the first four months.

Ms Knowles added that Bahamian insurance brokers were constantly having to educate employees on the benefits of signing up to group coverage, and running behind clients to encourage them to take annual physicals.

“The greatest battle is to encourage people to use it and access it,” she said of health insurance. “There’s so many more things that the Government can do to say they care about the health outcomes for Bahamians.”

Ms Knowles said the Government could “improve the health and welfare of its people” by focusing more on preventative care and combating non-communicable diseases.

“These are the things that insurance brokers and companies have been doing, but they want to switch something that works for something that doesn’t,” she told Tribune Business, referring to the proposed public health insurer under NHI.

“It’s totally, totally crazy. Our clients have seen tremendous savings through the benefits they desire to give, and we have educated so many Bahamians on how to use their insurance products.

“We’ve had clients who have had loss ratios of 100 per cent and brought them down to 60 per cent, making them exercise and eat and drink well. And you’re [the Government] going to say we don’t add value, and you’re going to separate us from that?”

Suggesting that the Government should focus on its regulatory role rather than running a public insurer under NHI, Ms Knowles questioned what effects the current scheme would have on the economy and its growth, with the insurance sector accounting for around 10 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).

Comments

sheeprunner12 says...

The question is: Who is Sanigest and the PLP/Perryites crafting NHIS to benefit?????
If they don't want the white boys of the big insurance companies to make the money...... then who will benefit????? ...................... hint: the Sunshine boys????????????

Banking and Insurance is big money ............. Perry done get the numbers boys straight, so who else gatta get straight before 2017????????????

Posted 19 November 2015, 2:49 p.m. Suggest removal

empathy says...

Those of us with health insurance seem oblivious to the NHI argument now, but we are sitting vulnerable, like a house above a limestone sinkhole, when a major injury or illness, retirement or old age, a denial like "preexisting condition", mental illness, self harm or job loss puts us inside the A&E of Princess Margaret Hospital...a very disconcerting place to be.

The good Rev Patternson, and others of his ilk, who spoke out against the so far hugely successful VAT, argue that "we can't afford NHI"! I will argue that we can't not afford it.

Talking with the folks who stand to loose revenue from a substantial change in the way private healthcare is financed and managed in this country, and here I refer to the medical insurance industry, including brokers, private healthcare facilities and the private physicians themselves seems foolish or disingenuous.

If our media wanted to educate then I'll advise more objective analysis of where we are (near the bottom of the list in many healthcare milestones while spending near the developed nations), what we can get for the money we spend (government >$300 million + private insurers $100 million), two tier health model (a wide disparity even within families) and suggest realistic objectives (you can't get something for nothing, so not having a NHI tax) is foolhardy).

Posted 19 November 2015, 9:58 p.m. Suggest removal

ohdrap4 says...

Yes you who are paying for health insurance are still vulnerable.
when you turn 60, your monthly premium will be higher than your NIB pension, sometimes twice as much.
Even if you are paying 300-400 doillars now and for the past 10 years, once
catastrophe hits, they will raise your premium to cost more than your mortgage.

Truth is, when you are insured, your hoapital bill is twice as much as if you tell them you are unisured. The bill they give to you as an uninsured patient is often lower than the 20% copay required of you anyway.

but this stuff the pwc put out is scary, makes health insurance mandatory and i truly hate the current private providers.

Posted 20 November 2015, 11:44 a.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

OK.......... but just look at the NHI schemes in Canada and Britain and the drain it has on the public treasury and the delays that the patients face ............... look at the quality of our public schools, clinics and NIB now .................. how will a NHI really make it better without serious investment in infrastructure and quality control .......... do you tax first to do that??????

Should we just get rid of anything public and just go private????? Hand the schools over to the churches/teachers and the clinics over to the doctors/nurses and let them manage them?????

The choices we have are few ......... public, private or joint partnership

Posted 20 November 2015, 10:47 a.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

the truth is a great number of Bahamians can not afford to pay for health insurance , I paid for many years, without out any claims. but the premiums keep on going up. I had to give it up. and pray to God for good health. Persons who can afford to will continue to buy health insurance. When one looses their job, there goes the insurance.

Posted 20 November 2015, 2:15 p.m. Suggest removal

Hogfish says...

this felicia knowles talking all horse shit out the left side her mouth!!

say brokers add a service and value for money. What cock and baloneyy foolishness!!

They just scared they (they 3 or 4 brokers that have the industry in the corner) ga loose the MILLIONS in fees they pocket for NOTHING!

The government pays anyway millions for govt workers private health insurance - which these theiving brokers take a piece! - but almost 90% of the workers can't even afford or won't pay the CO-PAY! So they still go to pmh.!

These brokers had it soo good for years.. juss letting the governemt and peoples money rroolllll right in. Yall could stick it up ya you know what!

Posted 20 November 2015, 2:34 p.m. Suggest removal

Alltoomuch says...

@empathy - you talk about "hugely successful VAT" Do you know where all that money has gone? and what its been successful for?

Posted 20 November 2015, 2:46 p.m. Suggest removal

juju says...

The health care money needs to be directed to education so that you all learn to spell correctly ,&$/?!

Posted 24 November 2015, 5:14 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment