Activists warn over Blackbeard’s Cay

By NICO SCAVELLA

Tribune Staff Reporter

nscavella@tribunemedia.net

A LOCAL environmental group yesterday warned Prime Minister Perry Christie that it would notify the cruise ship industry of the continued and illegal operation of Blackbeard’s Cay should his administration not take immediate action to shut down the controversial tourism project. 

Save The Bays (STB) CEO Vanessa Haley-Benjamin, in an open letter to Mr Christie, said Mr Christie’s failure to personally see to the “immediate closure” at Blackbeard’s Cay as directed by a previous Supreme Court order would no doubt cause the cruise ship industry “to be considerably alarmed to learn that they may be contributing to a facility that has been deemed unlawful by the courts”.

Threatening to lodge STB’s concerns with the industry if the “status quo persists”, she urged Mr Christie to “intervene and ensure that the law takes its course before such a step becomes necessary”. 

On August 31, Justice Stephen Isaacs signed an order designed to enforce his initial ruling against the government in the Blackbeard’s Cay matter, the latter of which found that both the Premises Licence for Blackbeard’s Cay’s captive dolphin facility, plus Site Plan Approval, “neither have been granted nor could have been granted”. 

Justice Isaacs’ initial ruling, delivered on July 17, 2014, also found that Blue Illusion Ltd, the owners of the $8m project, were in contravention of the Planning and Subdivisions Act and had conducted extensive development without site plan approval. The ruling further found that Mr Christie and the Town Planning Committee had breached their statutory duties. 

As such, Justice Isaacs’ ruling requires both Mr Christie and the Town Planning Committee to mandate that Blue Illusions cease developing the island location and restore the land to its original condition. And V Alfred Gray, as Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries, is required to remove the dolphins at Blackbeard’s Cay to a new “appropriate location”. 

Despite Justice Isaacs’ ruling, however, Blackbeard’s Cay has reportedly continued to operate as a cruise passenger getaway. 

As such, Ms Haley-Benjamin said this “high profile flouting of the law” and “abysmal handling of this matter has raised alarming questions about the state of governance in a country that depends on a reputation for stability and adherence to the law for its survival”.

“STB has repeatedly spoken out against foreign developers engaging in unregulated development, damaging our environmental heritage and defying of our sovereign laws in the process,” Ms Haley-Benjamin wrote. “We call upon the government of the Bahamas, as the defender and guarantor of the public’s rights – and particularly on you, Prime Minister, who serves as the custodian of the nation’s patrimony – to take action on this matter immediately.

“If the status quo persists, in due course, we intend to bring our concerns to the attention of the cruise ship industry, whose members would no doubt be considerably alarmed to learn that they may be contributing to a facility that has been deemed unlawful by the courts. We urge you to intervene and ensure that the law takes its course before such a step becomes necessary.”

She added: “Reputable foreign investors seeking to undertake projects that have the potential to create considerable financial and employment opportunities for this country will no doubt be turned off by the impression that the Bahamas has become a ‘wild west’ where the rule of law means little to nothing in practice. 

“At the same time, a failure on your part to treat the court’s order with the respect it deserves will only signal to those wishing to engage in unregulated development, to the detriment of the interests of the Bahamian people, that the government has effectively given them a green light to do as they please.”

In September, Wayne Munroe, QC warned that the Bahamian taxpayer would be held “liable for millions of dollars” should the government succeed in enforcing the Supreme Court order requiring it to close Blackbeard’s Cay. 

Mr Munroe told Tribune Business at the time that such action against his client, Blue Illusions, would be “manifestly unfair” and a breach of their constitutional rights because they were not a party to the court action that produced Justice Isaacs’ order. 

That action was between STB’s civic partner reEarth and the various government defendants, and Mr Munroe said “it wouldn’t be cricket” to enforce the order against Blue Illusions when it had been dismissed as a party to that case. He argued that since reEarth “chose to delete or dismiss” his client from the action, it could not now seek to benefit from an order impacting Blue Illusions – and which he said does not affect it, since it was a “non-party” to the legal battle. 

Blue Illusions, which is headed by St Maarten-based businessman Samir Andrawos, had invested $12m in transforming Blackbeard’s Cay into a cruise passenger getaway experience, complete with dolphin encounter and other attractions.

Between 60 and 100 Bahamians were employed at the site, just off New Providence’s north coast on Balmoral Island, opposite Sandals Royal Bahamian. 

Comments

birdiestrachan says...

Haley Benjamin wants to do damage to the Bahamas. I am sure the out spoken QC and Sam Duncombe have their hands in this matter. They will do well to remember that there are persons who would just like some bread while they have bread and butter. this may hurt poor people. But they do not really care about them.

Posted 23 November 2015, 1:50 p.m. Suggest removal

GrassRoot says...

I agree with you. A cheap PR stunt does not help anybody. What does help is someone filing a criminal complaint against the PM and the Ministers in charge for not enforcing the courts decision. So I hear that if a lawyer pisses off a sitting judge for no reason, the lawyer goes to jail, but if a party to court proceedings refuses to accept and adhere to a court's decision, nothing happens? Maybe it is also up to the court/judge to make an impression on PGC and the gang?

Posted 23 November 2015, 3:45 p.m. Suggest removal

TruePeople says...

The wanton disregard for the law, and it's very unbalanced application is what is doing Damage to the country. Mrs. B wants the rule of law to be respected and applied equally. That desire is only damaging to criminals.

Posted 23 November 2015, 1:57 p.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

Where was she when the Exuma Sea Park was dredged. Now Fred Smith said he was given a retainer fee. And what about shanty towns do they damage the Country.?

Posted 23 November 2015, 2:19 p.m. Suggest removal

themessenger says...

Shanty towns, properties owned, aided and abetted by BAHAMIAN slum landlords and in many cases the Government.
And your point is..................????

Posted 23 November 2015, 2:26 p.m. Suggest removal

asiseeit says...

Birdie can not comprehend the fact that her beloved PLP are breaking the laws of The Bahamas. She is to blinded to realize the implications of this and what it says about our country as a whole when the Government itself is contributing to the breakdown of law and order. Ignorance runs deep ion the Bahamas just as the politicians want, it's the only way they can continue to be elected.

Posted 23 November 2015, 5:36 p.m. Suggest removal

Voltaire says...

As always birdie - double standards. If its your party that does it, it is ok that it's illegal, because it is feeding Bahamians. You refer to the Exuma park dredging. You know how many people were hired to do that? Do you know how many Bahamians work on Bell Island now? Well how come it wasn't ok when the FNM allowed that in the name of all THOSE Bahamians who would "just like some bread"? Newsflash, the government breaking the law is NEVER ok, no matter which administration. Your government should be in the business of legitimately finding ways to get people a little bread, not allowing foreign developers to break the law.

Posted 23 November 2015, 2:36 p.m. Suggest removal

Voltaire says...

And furthermore, how was the dredging in the Exuma park illegal? What law was broken? It may have been a bad decision, it may have been the wrong decision, but it was not illegal, the necessary discretion was there in the law. Whereas in this case, the government is straight up defying the order of a Supreme Court judge. That is both illegal and unconstitutional. Undermining our democracy and the rule of law in a country already beset with lawlessness and a fundamental lack of respect for the rules. But somehow its Benjamin who means the Bahamas harm? Strange reasoning that.

Posted 23 November 2015, 2:38 p.m. Suggest removal

DonAnthony says...

We are a society of lawlessness and corruption personified in our government and present prime minister who blatantly refuse to comply with a Supreme Court order. This is a crime, and those officials are criminals and should be incarcerated as such. Our prime minister should be held in contempt of court until this order is complied with. How is there one law for some Bahamians and not for others?

Posted 23 November 2015, 2:40 p.m. Suggest removal

asiseeit says...

The idiot Prime Minister wonders why there is so much crime. Well if you have a government that breaks it's own laws why would you think the citizens would not follow suite? Why do these assholes in power think they can foist an attitude of "do as I say, not as I do" on Bahamians? The biggest criminals in the Bahamas are right in the House of Assembly, looking straight at the Prime Minister.

Posted 23 November 2015, 3:06 p.m. Suggest removal

realfreethinker says...

Birdie Birdie Birdie. Please remove the scales from your eyes. Take you head out of the government"s ass. I be you please for the country's sake

Posted 24 November 2015, 1:51 p.m. Suggest removal

Sickened says...

Birdie... thanks for reminding us of the prevalent D average! If you stopped commenting we would forget all about our country's underlying problem.

Posted 24 November 2015, 2:01 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment