80% Parliament backing needed for spending rise

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

Fiscal Responsibility legislation must “make it extremely difficult” for the Government to exceed Budget spending forecasts, an outspoken businessman yesterday demanding that any increase require at least 80 per cent Parliamentary approval.

Dionisio D’Aguilar, the former Bahamas Chamber of Commerce president, told Tribune Business that there needed to be “defined limits” and ‘caps’ on government borrowing and spending that were hard to remove.

Speaking after the Government increased its 2015-2016 full-year spending forecast by $62.5 million in the mid-year Budget, Mr D’Aguilar told this newspaper that such impositions were the only way to “drive” Fiscal Responsibility into being in the Bahamas.

He added that the increased estimates “absolutely” supported calls for this nation to enact Fiscal Responsibility legislation, which has been urged by the likes of the Coalition for Responsible Taxation, and now the Organisation for Responsible Governance (ORG).

“Fiscal responsibility should not simply be coming to Parliament to get permission [to spend and borrow more money],” Mr D’Aguilar said. “They should make it a lot more difficult than that.

“You need ceiling limits, and any time you want to increase the ceiling, 80 per cent of Parliament should approve it. If you intend to increase the cap, get the unanimous or near-unanimous consent of Parliament.

“It shouldn’t be easy; they have to involve the Opposition. There should be defined limits on borrowing. If you limit the borrowing, you drive Fiscal Responsibility.”

The Government has shown a marked reluctance to engage the private sector over its demands for Fiscal Responsibility-type legislation, and greater transparency and accountability for how taxpayer monies are used.

Prime Minister Perry Christie’s 2015 mid-year Budget pledge to hold a public consultation on Fiscal Responsibility-type laws, via the issuance of a policy paper, with recommendations submitted to government by year-end, has yet to materialise more than 12 months on.

Such legislation would bolster Government transparency and accountability for how the public finances are managed, requiring it to return to Parliament and obtain approval for any extra spending over what was approved in the Budget.

Many in the private sector view Fiscal Responsibility legislation as the Government’s side of the ‘fiscal bargain’, which needs to be implemented in return for the private sector agreeing to Value-Added Tax’s (VAT) implementation.

Mr D’Aguilar alluded to this yesterday, telling Tribune Business: “The purpose of the VAT monies was to reduce the deficit. They’re trying to wiggle out of their side of the deal, and are really taking the country to the edge by not living up to their side of the bargain.

“They’re not growing the economy or reducing unemployment. The only thing saving us from a downgrade is that we have promised to reduce the deficit to $141 million.

“The Government are playing with fire. They’ve got to stop frittering away the people’s money. If you have no ideas to grow the economy, you’ve got to keep expenditure in check.”

Calling for increased fiscal discipline by the Christie administration, Mr D’Aguilar expressed concern that the Government would use its VAT ‘windfall’ to finance increased spending on social programmes, taking the Bahamas into a ‘spiral’ of increased ‘tax and spend’ policies.

He added that an election year was also rapidly approaching, increasing the temptation for the Government to increase its spending as part of a re-election bid.

While net revenues increased by $217 million for the Government’s fiscal year first half, its recurrent (fixed cost) spending rose by $200 million year-over-year during the same period. This meant that the ‘primary deficit’ fell by just $17 million year-over-year, from $197 million to $180 million.

Michael Halkitis, minister of state for finance, said the recurrent spending rise was due to items being switched to that account from the capital Budget - a move that was flagged last May.

However, accounting for the $53 million drop in capital spending, the Government’s total spending was still up by $147 million for the six months to end-December 31, 2015.

This led to the Government exceeding its projected full-year fiscal deficit of $141 million by $16 million after the first six months, although Mr Halkitis said it remained ‘optimistic’ about closing the gap due to the bulk of revenues coming in during the second half.

“The vast majority of the Bahamian people don’t give a hoot, and the politicians take advantage of that,” Mr D’Aguilar told Tribune Business.

“If no one cares, and we borrow, borrow, borrow, that’s what got us into this $6.5 billion debt. There’s nothing to get anyone excited about this economy apart from reducing the deficit to $141 million.”

He added: “One wants to believe them [the Government] that they’re trying to do better, but when you look at something like a $62.5 million increase and they do not point it out and explain it...... tell people what you’re doing.

“It’s important that we all know what is happening. Prepare us for what you are doing, and if you’re heading to the precipice, pull us back. Act responsibly and don’t try to hide it from us.

“If you mismanage the economy, it will come back and destroy us. We gave them $350 million in extra taxes to eliminate the deficit. For once in your life, live up to your word.”

Comments

Economist says...

How can recurrent expenditure rise by $200 million in one year when you are holding or reducing spending?

Posted 17 March 2016, 2:23 p.m. Suggest removal

Required says...

Sounds like he should've made a presentation to the Constitutional Commission to include this suggestion in their report. Bringing it up now serves no purpose, really. Besides, 80% of 38 is 30.4, so 31. I doubt that there's sufficient members in the House that wouldn't increase spending.

Posted 17 March 2016, 4:13 p.m. Suggest removal

Weezie says...

So what do you propose.......do nothing.......say nothing.......and let the politicians continue to lie to us and say all is good and that they are not using the additional revenue earned from VAT to spend us back into unsustainable deficits. D'Aguilar trying to suggest ways to keep to keep the politicians fiscally responsible. If you have a better idea, suggest it!

Posted 17 March 2016, 6:17 p.m. Suggest removal

GrassRoot says...

well ideas along the lines of D'Aguilar are good. I just see a slight problem on the execution side of a plan like that. This will only happen once this country has sunken even more deeper in to the dirt and the few right minded and honorable people get together across party lines or if there will be finally a third political party that is strong enough to be the decisive factor in this country.

Posted 18 March 2016, 1:38 p.m. Suggest removal

themessenger says...

Grassroot my friend, you stand to be seriously disillusioned if you hope to find any "right minded and honorable people" in politics in this country today and, unfortunately for all of us, I don't see any political messiahs on the immediate horizon.
The people we need to run the country will never be elected simply because they are right minded and honorable people.

Posted 18 March 2016, 3:22 p.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

There are NO fiscal boundaries placed on our Ministry of Finance .......... most Ministers do not debate their allocations........... many cannot account for their budget heads spending ..... and there is very little "checks and balances" beyond embarrassment and the toothless Public Accounts Committee and the Auditor General who may present matters that would have happened a few years back ................ check out how the USA Congress controls the President on fiscal spending ......... they can literally stop government spending .... can we????

Posted 18 March 2016, 6:45 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment