Wednesday, September 7, 2016
By KHRISNA VIRGIL
Deputy Chief Reporter
kvirgil@tribunemedia.net
FREE National Movement Senator Carl Bethel yesterday said from a legal stand point, there is nothing the FNM can do to force the judiciary to unseal documents related to the new deal to complete Baha Mar and open it before the end of the 2016/2017 winter season.
Mr Bethel, in an interview with The Tribune, explained that there is no legal basis for the political organisation to assert a right to know in court in connection to the sealed documents.
He said the matter comes down to a private sector dispute, with the government only as a third party creditor.
“In my view there is not,” Mr Bethel, who also gives legal advice the FNM, said when he was asked if there was anything that the FNM could do to make the records public.
“There’s no right to the information of other parties, that’s my view. We have no public interest right to have access to public documents. We have no Freedom of Information Act to ground such an application. We are not parties to any of the actions. It’s for the parties to take those steps to raise the issue.”
Marathon MP Jerome Fitzgerald yesterday also agreed, saying: “I don’t know under what standing anyone would have (to seek to have the documents unsealed). The court has made an order so I’m not sure who has standing other than the parties who are involved.”
These comments came after attorney Fred Smith, QC, insisted in The Nassau Guardian yesterday that the opposition along with Baha Mar stakeholders should demand a judicial review for the courts to disclose the deal signed between the government and the Export-Import Bank of China.
Mr Bethel dismissed this assertion and expressed doubt that it would end with success.
“I hear some smart QC. If he believes that let him get someone to pay him to do it, but I could assure you I don’t think he’d have any success.”
He continued: “There is no legal basis on which we can assert a right to the knowledge of for example Cabinet collusions or the processes arrived at by Cabinet. There is no basis on which we can assert a public right just to go to court and get an order of discovery against say a ministry of any initial controversy. There is no right.
“The government has gussied up the Baha Mar thing, but it’s still really only a private sector dispute with the government as a third party creditor.
“But at the end of the day it’s for the parties to raise these issues. There is no public policy mechanism to go in and apply for judicial review. What right do you have to do so with such a private sector deal?”
The government has been heavily criticised over the fact that the deal is hidden from public view. It has led Prime Minister Perry Christie several times to defend the government in an attempt to free it from any blame in this issue. He has said that the court documents were sealed at the request of the Export-Import Bank of China (CEXIM).
However, the backlash continues to persist.
On Sunday, the FNM announced that the party was collecting signatures for an online petition to demonstrate the level of public disgust over the sealed Baha Mar deal. It is the party’s latest move to increase pressure on the Christie administration to release all documents related to Baha Mar negotiations.
FNM Chairman Sidney Collie urged Bahamians to endorse the petition, reiterating the party’s stance that the prime minister was duty-bound to make the agreement public.
“Bahamians are shocked and dismayed that the Christie-led government requested that the deal this government made with the Chinese be sealed by the courts of The Bahamas,” he said in a statement.
“This petition gives the people a tangible way to voice their disgust at how the prime minister shrouded his secret deal with the Chinese, unwilling to allow the people to review the contents and see for themselves what has been decided about their future,” Mr Collie added.
However, according to Mr Christie, the agreement was sealed by the court at the request of the Export Import Bank of China (CEXIM).
“Bahamians if you are concerned about your future, the future of your children and grandchildren, the Free National Movement urges you to sign this petition.”
Mr Christie announced that a deal had been reached between the government and CEXIM to remobilise the stalled resort during a nationally televised press conference last month. However, he did not provide any clarity on a buyer or the sale price.
Comments
TalRussell says...
Comrades! The former Papa Hubert's regime's attorney general should stick to be minded on beating the embattled Long Island's Loretta to running to replace Montagu's damaged Richard come the 2017 General cause he doesn't understand the difference between taxpayers and private parties concessions. The two is far from equal when one is exclusively based in the form of government making a contribution(s) of taxpayers moneys, lands and tangible things, and the courts must recognize to be concessions in which all of the concessionaire’s are borne exclusively and solely by the taxpayers of The Bahamaland, and that Comrade Carl does makes it the public's damn business.
Likes I says, it's Montagu all the way for Carl cause he legal brain sure ain't functioning so correctly when it comes to wanting to keep the taxpayers moneys, all secret and away from the public's right to be kept informed of how you spends their hard-earned VAT and other tax dollars paid into the public's treasury.
Amen!
Posted 7 September 2016, 2:27 p.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
These FNM fellows are so upset that a deal has been reached , so they have
to find something , anything to complain about. This is all to bad and to sad. They were
hoping this would not happen so they could make it a campaign issue.
Posted 7 September 2016, 5:10 p.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
The out spoken QC can always go before Judge " You Know who" and there will
be a judicial review and every thing will stop. right away. There will be no payments and there will be sale. The way to go outspoken QC. Maybe the "Pretty boy" will join you you two are smart just alike..
Posted 7 September 2016, 5:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
That is why the smart QC is a QC and Bethel is not. Of course it can be challenged and Smith is not the only lawyer who believes this.
What Bethel is really saying is that the **FNM don't have the balls** to challenge the PLP.
**Lots of empty talk, that is all the FNMs are**. What a waste of time.
Posted 7 September 2016, 7:58 p.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
You must be a hammer cause you hit the nail on the head. The FNM just too damn soft to challenge this and too damn soft to run a country. We truly don't have much of a choice come 2017. We have to take our chances and NOT VOTE IN ANY GOVERNMENT! It will be chaos I know, but the options to vote for are worse! Okay, maybe there are 2 or 3 honest people that we can vote for BUT THAT'S IT. We may have a three person government. At least it will be efficient!
Posted 8 September 2016, 9:06 a.m. Suggest removal
sheeprunner12 says...
The Supreme Court did not seal those documents on their own .......... the PLP Cabinet and/or the Bahamar "owners" had to have a role in directing the Supreme Court to do so ........... so we cannot blame the Court for sealing the documents, but the PLP/Chinese crooks with ulterior motives (election or otherwise)
........ the PLP Cabinet is behaving just like the Mafia cartel when it comes to its secret business dealings with Bahamar, Stellar, MSC, GBPA, Carnival, Bahamasair, BOB, BAMSI, BPL/PowerSecure, BTC/Liberty etc ................ the public is really kept in the dark
............ the FNM, the Unions, the Churches and other political parties should be bringing the whole country to Bay Street to demand the PLPs resignation because they have failed this country .......... but the silence and social apathy is deafening (hint-hint)
Posted 8 September 2016, 10:22 a.m. Suggest removal
Publius says...
What a waste of space Carl Bethel is.
Posted 8 September 2016, 10:59 a.m. Suggest removal
Observer says...
If any third party, (person or entity), has a right in law to badge into the private business affairs of another, then any one of us has the same right to break into the private residence of anyone, without impunity. Is that what we are waring for?
Posted 8 September 2016, 11:05 a.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
This is not "any third party" this is a case of those paying part of the price being entitled to see where there money is going. This is a public matter not a private one.
The Hawksbill Creek Agreement is there for all to see. Same thing.
Posted 8 September 2016, 1:29 p.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
The outspoken QC is not so smart. his "delivery boy:" gave him QC it was**
not necessarily earned. There were so many more deserving.
Posted 8 September 2016, 2:59 p.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
Birdie you really need to check you facts. Mr. Smith has won many cases that most thought impossible.
He has always stood up for peoples rights. Years ago, he won a case for Harvey Tynes QC who had been wrongfully detained by the police. He has been doing human rights cases almost his entire career.
He has been in land actions as well.
He was very deserving of being made a QC.
Posted 8 September 2016, 9:29 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment