Bar president comes to the defence of Attorney General

By AVA TURNQUEST

Tribune Chief Reporter

aturnquest@tribunemedia.net

BAHAMAS Bar Association President Elsworth Johnson yesterday defended Attorney General Allyson Maynard-Gibson against critics calling for her resignation over her decision to stop a private prosecution against the Sandals Royal Bahamian resort.

While he noted that the matter reinforces the argument for an independent director of public prosecutions, Mr Johnson branded criticisms as “unfair” and suggested that the move could bolster public perceptions of her level of independence in the role.

“High ranking members of the Cabinet seem to be saying that the AG should have consulted with them,” he said.

“The attorney general, that office doesn’t have to condescend to anybody when deciding to prosecute or nolle a matter. It is to be seen as independent.

“For persons to be making accusations, especially when you don’t know her consideration, without all the facts, its very unfair.”

“I don’t know that you go so far to say that because she decides to nolle a matter, that she should resign, especially when one can’t show there was any misconduct or that she was biased in any way.

“They nolle matters on a continuous basis, it’s just that you don’t hear about it.”

He added: “Why is it that this one is bringing so much public attention?”

“Highly political persons are expecting her to act a certain way. Perhaps her efforts in this matter indicate her level of independence.

“It may demonstrate or highlight the level of objectivity and independence that she brings to her office rather than the opposite… that she is not going to be swayed by proponents of labour union or senior members of her party,” Mr Johnson said.

The nolle order halts the action launched against the resort, its general manager, Gary Williams, and financial controller, Fitzroy Walker, by five officers of the Bahamas Hotel Maintenance and Allied Workers Union (BHMAWU) who had alleged that Sandals Royal Bahamian was in breach of the Industrial Relations Act by failing/refusing to “treat or enter into negotiations” with the union.

They had also claimed that the resort, Mr Williams and Mr Walker, had violated the Industrial Tribunal Relations Act by intimidating and terminating employees. The resort, and its executives, had denied all allegations.

Much of the public outcry over the nolle has hinged on the premise that it was signed on August 15, the same day the hotel terminated more than 600 employees.

However, in response to the pushback, the Office of the Attorney General released a statement clarifying that the order did not come into effect until it was entered in the Magistrate’s Court on September 19.

Mrs Maynard-Gibson explained that the private prosecution was initiated by the union, and not the state, while civil proceedings were underway in the Supreme Court between BHMAWU and the resort.

She said the nolle order did not prevent or compromise efforts to negotiate an industrial agreement between Sandals and the union.

While her party, the Progressive Liberal Party, has backed her decision, Mrs Maynard-Gibson has come under fire from the labour movement and the Official Opposition - both groups have called for her immediate resignation. Some of her Cabinet colleagues have also criticised her.

Last week in an article published in The Nassau Guardian, Labour Minister Shane Gibson said he was disappointed that Mrs Maynard-Gibson did not notify him of the decision as he and other government officials were actively working to resolve issues between the resort and the union.

His position was supported by Deputy Prime Minister Philip Davis, and Tourism Minister Obie Wilchcombe, with both senior ministers stating that the move sent the “wrong message”.

Mrs Maynard-Gibson last week maintained that she would not be swayed in the execution of her constitutional duty “by the political objectives of her colleagues or anyone else.”

Comments

jus2cents says...


Birds of a feather flock together.....as ever!

Posted 26 September 2016, 4:11 p.m. Suggest removal

truetruebahamian says...

Copies of the Constiyution are available at the government printing offices onBay Street for $15.00 a copy. Buy and read. She is ostensibly the second most powerful person in our country. Her decision in this case is in good standing, and I believe that in this case she made the right call. So read up and shut up and learn something for a change!

Posted 26 September 2016, 6:50 p.m. Suggest removal

thephoenix562 says...

Google it for free.I keep a copy on my desktop and consult it almost every week.

Posted 27 September 2016, 7:19 a.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

No she is not the second most powerful person in this nation. . .they are the GG, PM, PM, SOH and LOO. The PM asks the GG to bring the session of HOA to and end. . .GG ends government, the PM takes over the nation, effectively making PM and AG powerless. . .that decision was within her purview, but unconstitutional. . .that proviso has its apriority in constitutional justice and judicial balance rather than political skullduggery by self-interested public officials. This does not bode well for this AG. . . she cannot show how justice was done. . .whether constitutional fair play prevailed or political under-handedness was the order of the day! This case smells of abuse of powers. . .

Posted 27 September 2016, 11:49 a.m. Suggest removal

alfalfa says...

There is little doubt that she made the right decision. However, the question remains as to why this matter was being considered by the AG's office in the first place. It would seem to me that this should have been quashed from inception. Also the question remains as to why her boss, the PM, and the Minister of Labour and DPM all claim that they were kept in the dark about her decision. Apparently, the decision to "Nolle" this matter was made some time ago, but never communicated by the AG. Does the tail wag the dog in our system? Regardless of the Constitution, we all know who runs the show in our country.

Posted 26 September 2016, 8:31 p.m. Suggest removal

licks2 says...

Don't you gloat too much. . .this nation still has an avenue of petition all they way to Britain. . .you people know already what happened with Sandals the last that avenue was used. . .$12, 000, 000 was the conclusion!

Posted 27 September 2016, 11:53 a.m. Suggest removal

Socrates says...

dont need to be a QC to know this was the right thing to do..

Posted 27 September 2016, 6:36 a.m. Suggest removal

Alex_Charles says...

Ag of conflicts of lots on interests. In this administration she has not even remotely pretended to be non-partisan in her role. Also the part that made the inept Cabinet, unions and Bahamians upset was that she made this decision from the 15th of August but still proceeded to carry on with bullshit negotiations and talks with the parties concerned.

All in all time will tell if it was the right on wrong decision, I'm no lawyer. But one thing is for certain, the 3rd world banana republic continues to stumble in the dark

Posted 27 September 2016, 11:43 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment