Monday, April 24, 2017
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Bahamas lost an international shipping company’s investment to a rival Caribbean destination because of a “restrictive” work permit policy, an international consultant recommending this be restructured to drive economic growth. Oxford Economics, in a report commissioned by the Bahamas-based Organisation for Responsible Governance (ORG), called on this nation to tie foreign work permits to increased Bahamian employment, rather than identifying and training a local successor to take over.
The report, which examined three sectors - agriculture and manufacturing, shipping and logistics, and boutique hotels and vacation rentals - for their potential to grow and diversify the Bahamian economy, said the Government’s current work permit policy had “seemingly frustrated” most lost businessmen interviewed by Oxford Economics.
Demonstrating, in practical terms, how the Bahamas may be losing jobs, investment and economic activity as a result, the report said: “A shipping executive described how his company genuinely wanted to consolidate an international planning function in the Bahamas, but was thwarted by the foreign permit restrictions.
“The function was to be staffed by very senior shipping personnel (often with previous experience as ship captains). Reportedly, only short-term work permits were offered, and even then on condition that local Bahamas’ residents be trained in the positions.
“Senior executives were unwilling to relocate families to the Bahamas if their long-term stay was in doubt, and the company was unwilling to replace highly-skilled shipping executives with freshly trained local workers. That project reportedly went to another Caribbean location in nearly the same form as was proposed for the Bahamas.”
The company involved was not named in the report, but Oxford Economics is a highly-respected international consultancy that has worked frequently in the Bahamas, estimating the impact of major foreign direct investment (FDI) projects such as Baha Mar and also working for the Government on issues such as the Hawksbill Creek Agreement reforms.
Its report said that reform to the Government’s work permit policy “might prove effective” in encouraging economic growth, acknowledging that the issue is “always contentious” - and not just in the Bahamas.
Oxford Economics suggested the Bahamas could adopt a visa programme similar to the Canadian Provincial Nominee programme, assigning a specific number of work permits per industry for specialised positions that were hard to fill.
“Moreover, rather than making permit award conditional on specific matching of demand to training, it might prove more effective to link the award of work permits to a commitment by the receiving company to increase the number of Bahamas residents that it employs,” the report for ORG suggested.
“For example, the receiving company would hire a certain number of residents, even if those residents work in positions that differ from those in which the work permits were issued.
“This flexibility might help address concerns about disincentives to investment while also encouraging receiving companies to hire additional local workers.”
The report concluded: “A better balance between the need for businesses to bring in specialised foreign talent, and the concern that foreigners not take jobs away from Bahamas citizens, needs to be reached.
“Linking foreign work permits to increases in local employment at the job site - as opposed to focusing on training residents in highly specialised functions - would seem to offer a much more constructive approach.”
Basing its findings on interviews with more than a dozen Bahamian business executives, Oxford Economics said labour availability was a critical issue when it came to companies being able to expand and attract investment.
“This constraint has been long recognised in the Bahamas with the result that foreign work permits are made available,” the report for ORG said.
“Married to this approach has been a commitment to make the availability of foreign work permits conditional on the requirement that a local resident also be trained in the specific function for which the permit has been issued, with the objective of quickly replacing the foreign worker with a newly-trained Bahamian replacement.
“This approach has seemingly frustrated most parties,” the report added. “One of the most contentious issues brought up during the interviews was the appropriateness of issuing foreign work permits for specific high profile projects.
“Opinions expressed ranged from incredulity that permits were not issued for projects being considered in the Bahamas (including several that reportedly went elsewhere when permits were not issued) to outrage that permits had been issued for projects that seemed not to be making any effort to train replacement Bahamian workers.”
Breaking down the 9.208 work permits issued by the Department of Immigration in 2015, the Oxford Economics report said 42 per cent - some 3,870 - were issued for ‘elementary’ positions, with the largest source of such workers being Haiti.
Haitians were the largest source of workers for four out of the nine work permit categories identified, with agriculture, services and sales and professionals each accounting for a 10 per cent share of permits issued.
Americans produced the largest share of professional and managerial work permits, with Canada the top source country for foreign technicians, and China providing most service workers.
“Both feedback from our interviews and the data suggest that the policy to enforce a specific link between foreign worker permit functions, and training local residents to perform the same function, does not seem to be working particularly effectively,” the report for ORG said.
“For example, approximately 50 per cent of the work permits issued in 2015 would, according to this data, appear to require little specific skills training. Rather, these permits (for less skilled positions) seem to reflect employer difficulties in enticing local residents into accepting lower-paid positions in agriculture and low-end service occupations.”
Given the struggles to obtain sufficient quality high school graduates from the Bahamian education system, the Oxford Economics report added: “Trying to use the foreign work permit programme as a type of apprenticeship ‘on-the-job training’ programme is unlikely to work for high-skill positions in which the employer has highly specialised requirements that cannot be satisfied by the local workforce.
“In other situations, such as technical skills, the foreign work permit programme should not be designed to serve training purposes for which technical schools would be much better suited.”
Comments
banker says...
We also lost a big technology company because of the work permit issue and the months that it takes to get one. In the Cayman Islands, there is legislation saying that a work permit has to be approved within 10 business days.
Posted 24 April 2017, 2:40 p.m. Suggest removal
moncurcool says...
However also in the Cayman Islands you have to show a native Caymanian who is being trained to take over. Further, after 6 years, all persons on work permits have to leave the country. Caymanians look out for their own citizens first.
Posted 24 April 2017, 5:28 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Well here they name the person to 'be trained'.
but there is no vetting of the qualification of the trainee. so you get an accountant with all specializations, bells and whitles, and the trained is someone with 3 GCES.
Why no one complains? because the starting wage trainee, actually gets trained above his abilities and gets a better paying job after two years, at which time, a new trainee is hired.
i think they grant up to fourteen work permits, and sometimes do deny after the 14 years have passed.
Posted 24 April 2017, 6:04 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
Limiting shouldn't have to be strict if there's a fair trade off ratio.
Posted 25 April 2017, 4:55 p.m. Suggest removal
dtobias says...
I work in US high tech. I have been to the Bahamas 30+ times in my life, generally on bareboat charters. I would love to live there on canal front lot during my working years but the silly work permit rules stop me from doing it. I make deep 6 figures in USD. I spend that money in the USA right now. I would love to spend more of it in the Bahamas but cronyistic rules that sound good but which are not helpful to the average Bahamian citizen (and in fact quite the contrary) prevent me from living and working in the islands which are like a 2nd home to me. You have NO idea how rapidly growth would pick up, jobs would pick up if silly government with fake liberal ideals were pushed aside to allow the most productive people in the world to come live, work and play in the Bahamas instead of maintaining the current exclusionary "Bahamas for Bahamians" foolishness. Bahamian government cannot make up its own rules and expect the world to just accept them. The tail does not wag the dog. There is no need for me to prove this because after all these decades of cruddy growth and low paying and no clean high tech (like software companies) in the Bahamas it must now be self evident to everyone EXCEPT those who are benefiting personally from the crony capitalism that these policies do not work for the betterment of the average Bahamian. It's time to wake up and get leadership that understands that tourism is not a very good main occupation. It is boom and bust and even when booming it creates low paying service sector jobs. It's hard to improve the labor force if the only experience the people have is selling trinkets at the straw market and asking customers if they want fries with their burgers. The politicians will not change this until the people demand that they do so.
Posted 24 April 2017, 3:45 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
What would have been your job title?
Posted 25 April 2017, 5:05 p.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
This is all about Mr Meyers and how rich he and folks like him can get. while others
work all of their lives for the crumbs that fall from their tables.
Posted 25 April 2017, 3:45 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
This was my proposal. However I figured understudy would be trained later for take over years out, not train Bahamians for those top level jobs immediately. This could also be satisfied in certain sectors by scholarships and covered certifications in the field. The short permits seem to be your issue, and that's obviously the greedy immigration office who yet can't afford sufficient upgrades despite.
If no trainee is available in the field then that simply would be a requirement. The talent roster exists, gov just keeps it and the jobs like these secret for friends and favors.
Posted 25 April 2017, 4:38 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
if the company is the first of it's kind to apply here , that should be considered also.
Leave it to PLP to logically implement things.
Posted 25 April 2017, 5:07 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
"these permits (for less skilled positions) seem to reflect employer difficulties in enticing local residents into accepting lower-paid positions in agriculture and low-end service occupations.”
In the states if you are collecting unemployment , you have to prove that you are applying to enough jobs each week. The persons on social services here should be doing so also. in the same way, there ought to be proof that capable locals have not applied.
And the big elephant is where are the companies even posting these jobs?!! Email the constituency offices, use the Bahamian sites. Force government to utilize there databank.
In truth , the companies that are getting benefits in coming here are trying to be even more cheap in sourcing Haitians and Chinese. If it wasn't a huge benefit, they would be complaining having left already.
Posted 25 April 2017, 5:06 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
Why don't we ever hear of these solicitations? The silence makes it appear that there's no market interest.
Also keep profiles on the FDI's.
Posted 25 April 2017, 5:11 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment