Govt can save $80m by ‘verifying’ workers

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Bahamas Public Services Union’s (BPSU) president yesterday suggested the Government’s ‘employee verification’ exercise could slash recurrent spending by around $80 million.

John Pinder told Tribune Business he backed the Minnis administration’s efforts to weed out “phantom” workers and other unethical practices in the public sector, listing numerous areas of payroll wastage and “political patronage” that cost Bahamian taxpayers.

“That’s the norm. I welcome that,” the BPSU chief said of the upcoming ‘verification’ move. “They ought to do that to ensure persons being paid are, in fact, working for the Government or at least locate them. They just want to make sure that you are in the public service.”

Highlighting areas where taxpayers lost money, Mr Pinder said “there have been incidents” where civil servants were still being paid their regular salary despite having been convicted and incarcerated in Fox Hill prison.

He added that families had continued to receive the salaries of civil service relatives who were long deceased, while there was a pressing need for the Government to ensure it could locate persons on paid administrative leave - some who had been in that position “for many years”.

“They have persons on the Government’s pay sheet that they can’t locate,” Mr Pinder told Tribune Business. He added while such problems were “not too widespread, they’re sufficient that they need to be addressed”.

Asked how much the Government could potentially save from this effort, he replied: “They may be able to save as much as 3 per cent of recurrent expenditure.”

Based on the $2.67 billion recurrent (fixed cost) Budget for 2017-2018, a 3 per cent saving translates into an $80.1 million spending cut. Should this be achieved, it would leave the Minnis administration almost one-third of the way along the road to its main goal of a 10 per cent cut in total spending.

Mr Pinder suggested there was further room to cut beyond the Government’s ‘employee verification exercise’, identifying several areas he believed were afflicted by excessive salaries, unnecessary hiring and contract excesses.

“I think there are a number of persons that have been re-engaged by the public service that do not have the ability,” the BPSU president told Tribune Business.

“It’s more political patronage, finding a small project they can work on and keeping them there for three years, but it only takes six months.”

Mr Pinder said the Government would also enjoy “a big saving” by allowing persons on short-term contracts to leave once these deals expired, especially if there is little to nothing for them to do.

He also criticised the frequent practice of re-engaging former civil servants, who had retired, at vastly superior salaries to those previously enjoyed.

Mr Pinder said this was against General Orders, which govern the public service’s conduct. “Look at the salaries offered to people who retire and come back; these are much higher than the ones they left on,” he added.

“If you retire and come back, General Orders says you should come back at least two levels below where you were when you left. The Government needs to put more emphasis on succession training, so these persons nearing retirement age can pass over to an understudy when they leave.”

Mr Pinder said the Government could also save taxpayer monies by properly using public sector maintenance staff, and ensure they were provided with the right equipment, as opposed to outsourcing such contracts to the private sector.

“There’s a lot of work being contracted out to the private sector that can be done in the public service,” he told Tribune Business. “The Government has an entire maintenance team in the Ministry of Works that’s not being fully utilised.”

The BPSU chief said that properly using these workers would enable ongoing maintenance of government buildings, potentially reducing the annual summer spend on school repair contracts and such like.

“They also need to invest in some modern equipment that can help the staff with workload,” Mr Pinder said. “There’s a lot of work being outsourced to the private sector because they have better equipment.”

K P Turnquest, the deputy prime minister, confirmed on Wednesday that the employee verification exercise, announced by the Public Treasury Department on July 31, was designed to “clean up” the Government’s $650 million-plus annual wage bill.

He added that it was also designed to improve public sector efficiency and maximise the Government’s resources, matching public service skills to appropriate positions.

“That’s exactly right,” Mr Turnquest responded, when asked if the “verification exercise” was intended to eliminate corrupt workplace practices, such as employee “double dipping’’ and pay cheques being issued to non-existent staffers.

“We’re just verifying that we’re not paying phantoms,” he told Tribune Business. “We want to do our best with this verification exercise so that we can clean up the payroll, and know who we’re dealing with and where they are.

“We need to determine what we have in the public service, both in terms of who’s available, what skills they have, where they are located, and whether they exist or whether there is any duplication or phantoms in the system.

“This will help identify employees, and make sure they are deployed appropriately. We will go through the process and see what it determines.”

All civil servants, whether employed monthly or weekly, have to present themselves and their identification to “designated verification centres” during working hours between 9am and 4pm.

The exercise, which is to last from August 8 to August 31, also applies to Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Tourism personnel deployed overseas.

“Persons who fail to present themselves to be verified will have their salary interrupted from September 2017 until such time as they comply with the verification and reinstatement process,” the Public Treasury’s circular warns.

“It is imperative that you inform all of your officers immediately, wherever they are assigned overseas and in the Bahamas, to present themselves to the designated verification centres within the above time period.”

The Government’s move sends another signal of its intent to “drain the swamp” and impose discipline on the public sector’s spending/costs -- an action prompted by the Bahamas’ continuing fiscal crisis.

Comments

sheeprunner12 says...

John Pinder is a disgrace!!!!! ............ He has been sitting as President of the BPSU for over a decade and was quiet about this wastage of government revenue ........ How can he fix his mouth and continue to beg for more salary increases, while not helping it to save money.

Posted 4 August 2017, 6:22 p.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Fully agree. This heinous man should be interrogated by law enforcement authorities as he seems (by his own admissions) to have considerable knowledge of many instances of past and continuing fraud involving our public sector payroll.

Posted 4 August 2017, 10:21 p.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

This simple exercise is not sufficient if KPT does not do the following ......... 1. Request each employee's official government I.D. ........... 2. Request each employee's original letter of appointment to the Public Service ....... 3. Request each employee's proof of most recent appointment in the Public Service .......... 4. Request each employee's highest academic or skill documents ............ This is the only way that the government will get ACCURATE information for the civil service to match employee's appointment, skills and proper pay-scale ....... There are TOO MANY anomalies in the civil service based on employee appointment, skill level and pay scale ......... The PLP just did this same thing two years ago ....... this I.D. check-off is not enough

Posted 4 August 2017, 6:26 p.m. Suggest removal

Abrams says...

I agree with most of the comments made. It is unfortunate that these SWAGS (sophisticated wild ass guess(es)) by a person(s) that is / are meant to be an authority(ies), are allowed to be published. They are taken as fact by a public that is now vengeful, bruised, unforgiving and spewers of vitriol who operate on the aphorism of "never let the facts spoil a good story!". Succinctly, no matter how one slices and dices, there is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY the Bahamas Government is losing $80 million annually or 3% of the 2017-2018 $2.67 billion recurrent expenditure due to salaries and wages being paid to phantoms and other fictitious employees. NO WAY. The $80 million may be an overall figure when one considers all categories of expenditure and Government waste but certainly not isolated to salaries only of $650 million annually, of which $80 million is 12.3%. Further translated, assuming the average Government employee makes $25,000 annually, $80 million represents 3,200 phantom / fictitious employees. NO WAY. The cumulative effect over the past 5 years would be $400 million. If this on the very remote chance ever proves to be the case, from the Financial Secretary down to the entire Treasury Staff, should be fired. Of course, it would take a well trained Price Waterhouse ,man like Peter Turnquest, to uncover what folks from the other Big 4 accounting firms whom are its OFFSPRING, could not. In auditing, it is done through a simple test of what we call "Full and False Inclusion testing!"

Posted 5 August 2017, 8:07 a.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

What is far worst is the one billion-plus pensions and gratuities paid to retired civil servants .......... without them having to contribute one single dime ....... and when you add that at least 1000 retirees are re-employed, that is simply not feasible and unsustainable for the Treasury and NIB by 2030

Can you imagine that we have to pay a $250,000 PM pension to Perry now??????

Posted 5 August 2017, 8:43 a.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Corrupt senior government officials and other employees in the public sector who are eventually convicted of crimes presumably would be deemed to have **not** met the conditions of their employment and therefore would lose their entitlement to any pension and other benefits they would have otherwise received. It would be the height of lunacy for such individuals convicted of crimes like fraud, embezzlement, bribery, extortion, etc., through the abuse of their public office and the public trust, to retain their entitlement to pension and other benefits paid from the public purse. Minnis nevertheless should confirm to all of us that this is the unequivocal position and policy of his government.

Posted 5 August 2017, 10:17 a.m. Suggest removal

OMG says...

What about one person hired as a head janitoress but never worked a day on one of the family islands.

Posted 5 August 2017, 10:09 a.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

And what yall do about it??????

Posted 5 August 2017, 10:48 a.m. Suggest removal

Truism says...

That Mr. Pinder would make such an obviously false assertion means only that he's now singing for his supper. Man up John boy, find your Fix Hill pride. Do not support garbage...

Posted 6 August 2017, 6:29 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment