Comrades! The Tribune, before it blocks posts here should remember they helped to get elected a party promising full, open and complete public transparency. Red shirts must expect be publicly held to higher standards than the previous PLP administration - who were quick to the legal draw threatening libel suits to shut down discussion. Politicians are not a privileged bunch and should learn to respond without making threats shutdown the conversation - no matter how uncomfortably painful. This is not a legal question. It is big boys transparency question.

Tal, I have to disagree. The Tribune helped to get rid of the criminal organization know as the PLP - that is much different than trying to get the FNM elected. The FNM was and still is a MUCH better option, but the FNM is BY FAR a great option. So far I would give them a barely passing grade.

Which Bahamas are you living in? How did you arrive at the conclusion that the public are or will hold the current Minnis FNM administration to higher standards than they held the Christie PLP administration? Yes, the public's expectations are high but that's because the FNM propose to be more open, transparent and democratic than they claim the PLP were while in government. Threats of lawsuits are simply that, threats. There is nothing to fear from such threats, even if a lawsuit is actually filed, until you get to trial when it becomes a matter of what can each of the parties prove. The threat of a lawsuit by Mr Robinson arises from what he says is an untrue allegation made against him that if it is untrue amounts to libel and/or slander. This is not an issue of uncomfortable painful nests or even a big boys transparency question as in the cases of Frank Smith, Kendred Dorsett and Shane Gibson, but a question of truth: can or will the person/s making these anonymous allegations against Mr Robinson have the intestinal fortitude to step into the spotlight and prove the truthfulness of what they say? That is the real, true legal question.

in a democratic society, politicians are supposed to be servants of the people and accountable. it is not enough for this poltician to simply say its not true. whatever the charge, he must provide evidence to substantiate his innocence otherwise it would reasonable to assume where there is smoke, there is fire...

I don't have to answer you nothing. . .you say I teif. . .I say I did not! The burden of proof is on you there charlie. . .you show what I tief or shut ya mouth up!!

Socrates, I can't disagree more. If that were the case it would be far to easy to keep coming up with lies on someone and have them prove otherwise. Almost impossible to do day in, day out.

How do you find evidence for something that didn't happen. You can't be serious

He will not speak to the issue of his authority to issue contracts Why not? he speaks of Janitorial salaries in a disrespectful manner and he says what he spend in Bains Town all he
has done so far is send some one to check the people there blood pressure. which he knows
is very high.. Social media got him where he is today and he can rest assured it will remove him from his perch,

How are the in door toilets progressing That was one of the things they used against the PLP.

Comrades! Nothing do this particular MP, there is hot talk of another sitting red shirts MP about cross the House of Assembly floor..... will they sit as an Independent, or as the Green party's very first MP?

Politicians should have realized by now that EVERYTHING come to light in this age of social media and leaking of information. Can't hide anything anymore. thank God. Didn't say he tief anything, buy if he did, evidence WILL surface. Somebody will leak the bank balances if it's true.

Comrade StillWaters, social media is a dangerous tool hand people who take pride they's no deep freezes - we can't keep nothing we selves.

Tal, politicians have been able to hide far too much for far too long and stolen far too much money from far too many contracts. Time for it to stop by any means necessary, until they (PLP and FNM) get the message that we are not going to let it continue without raising hell.

For a newspaper that prides itself on having been in business since 1903, the Tribune's reporting standards have really slipped. Social media has now become its "go-to" for so-called "news" instead of good old investigative journalism. The great beauty of social media, even the commentary facility on this website, is that I can sit at my computer, make all kinds of allegations and accusations against anyone I please and am not asked to nor need I provide one iota of proof that any of it is true. What contract/s and from whom is Robinson alleged to have demanded kickbacks? When and where did it occur? How much is involved? What does the Deputy Prime Minister have to say about the alleged meeting between him and Robinson on what has to have been the 2nd December? Rather than just rubber stamping anything on social media as true or partially true, the Tribune needs to investigate allegations made there to determine their truthfulness before rushing to print. Unlike coverage of Parliamentary proceedings, repetition of material on social media does not carry any immunities of its own nor does it qualify as justification.

It's a strange one for sure.. I think the story was "that story went viral". but you do kinda give it an iota of legitimacy by reporting that it went viral.

He makes his MP and his PS salary plus his allowances ........ Just post your I/E statement each month and show the critics that you are a millennial politician and not a SLOP-style whiffer.

I hope it's not true, he's too young for dis. And it would be hypocritical of the admin to be dragging three men through court for the very same thing but allow him to continue to serve.

The approach taken by the Minnis administration here is troublesome.

The junior MP claims that his entire MP salary goes to his constituency, yet from his declaration of assets upon nomination it is clear that he then would have no way to pay his own way. So what money is putting food in his mouth?

There are allegations of corruption against a redshirt, and the government's response is, "We ain't even going to look into dat!"?

It is clear that they have, from day 1, only seen transparency and anti-corruption as an anti-PLP measure, but not as a general principle that should guide them in government, too.

He said he uses his entire "MP" Salary which is $28,000. I'm guessing he is living off of his Junior Minister salary which would be in addition to the $28,000.

You would be correct. He makes about $60,000. as a PS,but "Required" won't mention that because he/ she doesn't want the truth to interfere with the story.

Travis is 22 years old ....... He says he give will give back his MP salary and live off his PS salary ........ That is more than the 10% required by God ....... How many of us would do that?????? ......... We seem to be into the "Gotcha!!" gimmicks like the USA.......... Allegations cannot convict a person but it sure leaves character stains.

It would be ridiculous and troublesome if Hubert does not prosecute this guy for corruption.

After all he has the same amount of evidence as past PLP cabinet ministers who have been charged in the courts: word of mouth. LOL

You're right...

You are one boongey hole. A real ass wipe.A political hack