Thursday, March 16, 2017
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Bahamas “is becoming a socialist state”, an outspoken FNM candidate said yesterday, blasting the Government’s decision to move ahead with controversial labour law reforms as “madness”.
Dionisio D’Aguilar, the party’s Freetown candidate in the upcoming election, told Tribune Business that the proposed changes to the Employment and Industrial Relations Acts would only “make it harder” to cut the 25-30 per cent unemployment rate among young Bahamians.
Speaking after Shane Gibson, minister of labour and national insurance, tabled Bills to change both laws in the House of Assembly yesterday, Mr D’Aguilar, who owns and runs the Superwash laundromat chain, warned they would deter Bahamian businesses from hiring.
Acknowledging that the Government would likely accuse himself and the FNM of being “insensitive” to the plight of Bahamian workers and the proverbial ‘small man’, Mr D’Aguilar argued it was more important to spark job creation for all rather than impede business expansion.
“You already have an economy that is not growing,” he told Tribune Business. “You already have a private sector that is stressed. You already have small businesses screaming about bureaucracy and the cost of running a business, and now you’re increasing the taxes they have to pay for running their businesses.
“We’re becoming a socialist state. This will prevent the free movement of people, and make it more expensive to hire people. Businesses are not going to hire people, and will try like hell to make their businesses as efficient as possible so they don’t have to.”
Mr D’Aguilar added: “The solution is not to increase the cost of labour. The solution is to make it as easy as possible to hire as many people as possible.
“I know they’re [the Government] going to throw the jeer that rich people don’t know what poor people are going through, and that Dionisio D’Aguilar is rich and that he doesn’t understand. But I’d prefer to have a job.
“This is going to turn the private sector off from employing people, and not everyone can currently get a job. They’ll say I’m insensitive, but they’re insensitive to that,” the FNM candidate continued.
“You start to increase the burden on the private sector to employ people, you’ll make it harder for the 11.6 per cent who are unemployment, the 25-30 per cent of 16-24 year-olds who are unemployed, to get a job. I think it’s madness.”
Key among employer concerns the major 67 per cent increase in the Employment Act’s redundancy pay ‘cap’.
While notice, or pay in lieu of notice, has been left unchanged, the Government has pressed forward with the two-thirds increase in the ‘cap’.
Line staff are currently entitled to a maximum 24 weeks or six months’ redundancy pay under the Employment Act, gaining two weeks for each year they have been employed up to the 12-year ‘cap’.
However, the Bill requires the ‘cap’ to be increased to 32 weeks (16 years) immediately upon enactment of the reforms. And, ultimately, the ‘cap’ for line staff redundancy pay is to be increased to 40 weeks some two years after the amendments are passed.
As for managerial staff, the existing 48 weeks (12 months/one year) redundancy pay maximum that they are due currently under the Employment Act is to be immediately increased to 64 weeks. Should the proposals pass, the ‘cap’ will ultimately be lifted to 80 weeks after two years.
Mr Gibson, addressing the House of Assembly yesterday, with trade union leaders and representatives packing the public gallery, argued that the changes to both Bills would strengthen protections and benefits for Bahamian workers.
He said too many were vulnerable to being made redundant at “a moment’s notice”, and were often unable to collect severance pay and other benefits due to them under the law from employers.
Mr Gibson said the changes also mandate that employers must accept a worker’s request to deduct union dues from their wages, and strengthen the workings of the Industrial Tribunal.
Mr D’Aguilar, though, said the Employment Act’s existing one-year redundancy pay ‘cap’ for managerial staff, who have been with a company for 12 years or more, was “generous”. Should the changes go through, employers may have to give long-serving managers more than a year-and-a-half’s pay when they are terminated.
“I think it’s crazy, absolutely crazy,” Mr D’Aguilar told Tribune Business. “I always thought the 48 weeks to pay off someone was generous, but now I’ve got to pay a year-and-a-half, or 80 weeks, to get rid of them.
“This is not going to help employment. People want a job to have a sense of value. Get through the emotion of rich persons giving benefits to the poor. We want to grow the economy, and keep people employed.”
Most of the proposed reforms appear to be a direct response to the situation at the Melia Nassau Beach Resort, where the hotel is no longer collecting union dues and paying them to the union, and Sandals Royal Bahamian’s termination last August of its near-600 strong workforce - an event some regarded as ‘union busting’.
Sandals, though, said that with no industrial agreement in effect between the Bahamas Hotel, Catering and Allied Workers Union (BHCAWU) and the resort industry, it had no choice but to terminate its workforce to facilitate much-needed repairs.
And observers have pointed out that responsibility for the absence of a binding industrial agreement rests squarely with the BHCAWU, as it failed to initiate negotiations on changes it wanted prior to the previous deal’s expiry - resulting in employers continuing as if the latter was still in effect.
The proposed reforms to section 51 of the Industrial Relations Act appear to be an attempt to counter this, as they deem the terms and conditions of industrial agreements as automatically incorporated into individual workers’ contracts.
Other proposed amendments force employers to start collective bargaining talks within 45 days of receiving a trade union’s industrial agreement proposal - something that appears designed to counter situations such as the one where Sandals refused to treat and deal with the Bahamas Hotel, Maintenance and Allied Workers Union.
Comments
DDK says...
Mr. D’Aguilar is, of course, so right. Sounds like another PLP election ploy, albeit a very dangerous one.
Posted 16 March 2017, 3:04 p.m. Suggest removal
sheeprunner12 says...
Pindling was a socialist .......... Perry is just trying to buy votes from specific voting blocs (like unions) .............. but workers cannot work if the employers cannot thrive ....... that is the problem right now
Posted 16 March 2017, 3:51 p.m. Suggest removal
The_Oracle says...
Who will employ them when the private sector is gone?
Who can be penalized when they don't exist?
What the private sector will realize, is that they will have to pillage their own businesses to keep up with government pillaging, if they are to retain anything out of their efforts and investments.
The treasury is apparently not enough for them all, they want everything from everyones pockets.
Posted 16 March 2017, 4:57 p.m. Suggest removal
Socrates says...
i've said for decades to my friends that we are a socialist society largely due to Pindling and Hanna... they got it from the UK who in the 70s and earlier were also socialists until the Thatcher years.. Unions are the last remaining notorious bastian of socialism and it seems that this sort of legislation combined with no financial discipline by gov't and debt spiraling out of control, will seal the fate of this once proud country.
Posted 16 March 2017, 5:45 p.m. Suggest removal
sealice says...
when were we proud?? when we were British?
Posted 17 March 2017, 8:55 a.m. Suggest removal
Well_mudda_take_sic says...
But you don't see Minnis or McCartney saying they will repeal this new legislation in its entirety if they are fortunate enough to become the next PM. Therein lies the hard rub for voters! This is the reason why I will be voting for the reputable independent candidate running in my constituency who carries no bad baggage from either the PLP or FNM.
Posted 16 March 2017, 8:41 p.m. Suggest removal
killemwitdakno says...
If 1% of a company's profits equates to more than what they pay, then they should be required to meet standard pay for those careers.
Shame on D'Agular for not even mentioning that a compromise could be analyzed. I bet he's too cheap to properly air condition his wash houses hence deaths have occurred.
Posted 16 March 2017, 8:53 p.m. Suggest removal
Craig says...
D'Agular is right, what incentive is there to hire? They are only incentivizing businesses to improve and automate operations to maintain or reduce staffing levels. Additionally businesses will be less likely to keep employees employed for longer periods. Employees can forget pay increases in the foreseeable future, especially in the low margin industries such as retail and construction. Adding this tax will further the gap between legitimate business and those businesses that don't pay all the NIB, business license, severance pay, and soon to be NIH they are supposed to. This is a huge problem in construction. This law will make it difficult for legitimate business to compete due to the costs of doing business including the additional overhead required. It is clear that those who proposed this bill have no idea about how business works or cares for that matter, and are being influenced heavily by the unions and probably for political reasons.
Posted 16 March 2017, 11:53 p.m. Suggest removal
Porcupine says...
The problem is that few people understand what socialism is.
If Jesus were alive today, there is no question he would be a socialist.
But, nobody wants to discuss this, do they?
Socialism is an economic system, not a political system.
As a business person, I say yes, it is horribly difficult to do business here.
This is because of the inefficiencies, corruption, lack of understanding basic economics, extremely high taxes and lack of concern for the future of The Bahamas.
Posted 17 March 2017, 6:27 a.m. Suggest removal
Wisdom_Prime_Unlimited242 says...
I know right?
The Early Church, and ancient Israel practiced Socialism, in the acts it is said that the members of The Early Church bought property and sold of it and took the money there of. All the members placed it in a pot, and the money was all distributed to who God stated. That is a fundamental characteristic of Socialism. The taking and distribution of the people's money. And that is how ancient Israel functioned as well, off of Socialism, and when practiced properly (and when the people worked well with the system) it was prosperous. The problem today is that Socialism is so closely tied up with the red scare that no one can trust it anymore. That is why the economy's of today are heading for collapse.
Posted 13 April 2017, 1:31 p.m. Suggest removal
themessenger says...
Winston Churchill put it plainly;
“Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.”
Also,
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings, the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
Posted 17 March 2017, 7:44 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment