Tuesday, March 28, 2017
By NICO SCAVELLA
Tribune Staff Reporter
nscavella@tribunemedia.net
THE Christie administration is “fully on track” to honouring its commitment to push for the release of the sealed Supreme Court Baha Mar documents before the scheduled April soft opening of the beleaguered West Bay Street mega resort, Attorney General Allyson Maynard-Gibson said yesterday.
Mrs Maynard-Gibson also told The Tribune that she is “dismayed” that Free National Movement (FNM) Leader Dr Hubert Minnis is “rooting against Bahamians” with his continued scepticism over the mega resort’s future, and accused Dr Minnis of doing so for “political gain”.
Mrs Maynard-Gibson also fired a shot at Dr Minnis for former Prime Minister and FNM Leader Hubert Ingraham’s recent suggestions that the Christie administration has not held Baha Mar’s lender and general contractor to account for their obligations. She said she agreed with suggestions put to her recently that Mr Ingraham has now become the FNM’s spokesperson because the party “doesn’t trust (Dr Minnis) to speak”.
In December, Prime Minister Perry Christie announced the official sale of Baha Mar to CTF BM Holdings, a subsidiary of the Hong Kong conglomerate, Chow Tai Fook Enterprises Ltd (CTFE).
Apart from failing to reveal the cost at which the shuttered resort was sold, Mr Christie at the time spoke minimally of the details surrounding the deal, adding that it was still sealed by the Supreme Court at the request of the Export-Import Bank of China (CEXIM). That sale has not been finalised.
Then, after a wave of fierce scrutiny levelled at his administration over the sealing of documents related to the new deal to open Baha Mar, Mr Christie told reporters in January that Mrs Maynard-Gibson had been directed to have the records made public at the “earliest opportunity”.
The documents were sealed at the request of the CEXIM Bank, Mr Christie has said.
Mrs Maynard-Gibson said later that month that the release of the Baha Mar documents would “most definitely” be released before the soft opening of the resort, which is set for April 21.
When asked by The Tribune for an update on that process yesterday, Mrs Maynard-Gibson would only say: “All of the government’s commitments are fully on track”.
She went on to criticise Dr Minnis for “consistently rooting against Bahamians” and also seeking to gain political mileage with his continued criticisms of the government’s handling of the Baha Mar debacle.
Dr Minnis has pledged that his party will “engage and execute a real sale” of the Baha Mar resort “to a qualified and respectable purchaser who believes in Bahamians,” should the FNM win the next general election.
Dr Minnis has also criticised the recent transfer of Baha Mar to CTFE, calling it a “great public relations exercise” with no “real significance” .
“I am dismayed that they’ve been consistently rooting against Bahamians,” Mrs Maynard-Gibson said in response. “I recall distinctly your Peter Whiteheads, your Fred Hazelwoods, your Wayne Chee-A-Tows, all saying how grateful they were the Prime Minister had stayed the course and stayed focused and gotten Bahamians paid, Bahamian entrepreneurs paid, $100m, those employees paid all that they were due, and on and on.
“The commitment, more than some $250m to open the enterprise, the confidence shown in the Bahamas by having CTFE, a world class operator at the table investing in the Bahamas at this time in the world’s economy, all of it is good news, all of it’s good for Bahamians, all good for the Bahamas. But for political gain, for what appears to be political gain, you have these people, (Dr Minnis) in particular, rooting against Bahamians. I’m very disappointed by that.”
Of Mr Ingraham’s suggestion last week that the government was not as authoritative as it should have been in holding stakeholders, including CEXIM and general contractor China Construction America (CCA) accountable for failing to deliver what they promised the Christie administration on Baha Mar’s completion, Mrs Maynard-Gibson said: “My answer to that is that I was some place on the weekend, when people were saying how sorry they felt for (Dr Minnis), that the FNM doesn’t trust him to speak, which is why they are bringing Mr Ingraham out. And I have to say that I don’t disagree with that assessment.”
Last week, in the absence of a casino operator license and no definite answers on when guest reservations will be accepted, CCA officially transferred the resort to CTFE. The transfer was executed by CCA handing over to CTFE its temporary certificate of occupancy, which now allows visitors to occupy rooms and utilise other amenities.
At the time, Graeme Davis, CTFE Bahamas president, said the resort would begin taking guest reservations “very soon” with the launch of Baha Mar’s advertising campaign. He went on to suggest that non-paying guests would “fill” the resort on its first day of operation, explaining that guests were “invited” for Baha Mar’s celebration and ribbon cutting to commemorate its opening.
Comments
Sickened says...
This screeching vagina beast has to stop with her lies. My God lady! Don't you claim to be a Christian???
All this lying about Minnis 'rooting against Bahamians' is foolishness for the 'D' average and Birdiestrachan. Do us a favor... the next time your speak, speak with integrity and self respect. You make me want to vomit in your mouth.
How on earth could a god allow you to be a mother and to have the even the slightest opportunity to mother and raise a human being.
Posted 28 March 2017, 5:05 p.m. Suggest removal
Reality_Check says...
The Bahamian judge in the Baha Mar local legal proceedings (Justice Winder) should have long ago ordered that all of the transcripts, documents and reports filed with the court be unsealed, i.e made available for inspection by the public, in particular the news media. The judge's failure to recognize the public's right to have access to this information in the run up to a general election is frightening to say the least. It certainly appears the court is wrongfully interfering in the upcoming general election by concealing information the present government does not want to be made public. There have been many proper demands made for the information to be put in the public domain because there is no justifiable national security interest for not doing so. The court's continued willingness to wrongfully withhold this information from the public points to a lack of independence that is most harmful to our country's democratic processes. The fact that the Chief Justice has not weighed in or intervened by now in this matter is also of great concern to the public at large. These are all very serious matters!
Posted 28 March 2017, 5:45 p.m. Suggest removal
Well_mudda_take_sic says...
Allyson Maynard-Gibson a/k/a the Evil Wicked Witch was instrumental in seeing to it that the entire Baha Mar matter was assigned to an "accommodating" judge, one who would wrongfully agree to the sealing of documents vital to the public interest. Only now, as we stand on the verge of a national general election, is she even considering the possibility of ever releasing these documents that every voter should have all along have had unfettered access to, ceratinly well before going to the polls in late April or early May. The truly sad thing here is that she has severely tainted the Supreme Court as nothing but a tool beholden to do the government's bidding. The Supreme Court has allowed its image to be seriously tarnished in the eyes of the public as a result of the "duplicitous role" that it has unfortunately been made to play by keeping the Baha Mar documents, transcripts, etc. under seal. The public no longer trusts our court system now that it appears to lack the independence mandated by our constitution. Truly sad indeed!
Posted 28 March 2017, 6:02 p.m. Suggest removal
realfreethinker says...
If the court has sealed it howthe f..k can mayonaisse Gibson get them to release. Is the government now directing the court? If that is so then we have a major constitutional issue arising.
Posted 29 March 2017, 12:51 p.m. Suggest removal
concernedcitizen says...
Because of my work I deal w/ a lot of high net worth guest .I would always "tote " the benefits of them investing here ,ie 1/2 a million for residency , stable government , and the privy council as our court of last resort . After watching the way the used the courts to rob Izzie for the Chinese and the way they used a few slick moves and ownership transfer through a SPV to make a claim to the privy council much harder.I can no longer push the benefits of the Bahamas as a safe ,honest tax/residence haven for HNWI...
Posted 30 March 2017, 8:13 a.m. Suggest removal
Well_mudda_take_sic says...
Anything the Evil Wicked Witch meddles in for whatever purpose (usually though for her own personal benefit in some devious way) invites plenty trouble for the Bahamian people. Same goes for Baltron "Bag Man" Bethel.
Posted 29 March 2017, 9:04 a.m. Suggest removal
proudloudandfnm says...
TRIBUNE
I know Bahamar is important. SO IS GRAND LUCAYAN IN FREEPORT!
Word is Wynn and Hard Rock pulled out.
HOW ABOUT AN UPDATE TRIBUNE??????
Posted 29 March 2017, 9:34 a.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
soft opening, soft opening.
y'all search your phones for soft opening.
it means guests pay rock bottom rates but sleep in rooms without curtains, air condi or hotwater while construction is going on.
the internet also says soft openings happen with little or no publicity.
only here they plastered on the news.
Posted 29 March 2017, 11:44 a.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
The weird thing is this idea of a "soft opening" and "temporary residency permit" is the exact opposite of anything a five star resort would want associated with its brand in such a grand fashion, it's just plain weird. Which five star resort plasters over the press, *we're open but we have a bunch of issues that the inspectors say need to be fixed, come stay with us*.
Posted 30 March 2017, 2:55 a.m. Suggest removal
concernedcitizen says...
Soft opening in this case means invited non paying guest .Go on line and try to book a from ,,there is not even rooms to book for 2018
Posted 30 March 2017, 8:15 a.m. Suggest removal
realfreethinker says...
I would really like to tell you what "soft opening" Perry talking about,but that might not be appropiate here.
Posted 29 March 2017, 12:53 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"commitment to push" not "commitment to release" as was promised. How are you on track to "push" anyway lol...
Posted 30 March 2017, 2:48 a.m. Suggest removal
cmiller says...
I just hope people are not leaving the jobs they already have for employment at Bahamar like the last time. The 'soft opening' probably will be a 'hard closing' right after elections.
Posted 30 March 2017, 10:16 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment