Friday, November 17, 2017
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
THE Government will use its successful $750 million bond issue to “make the most compelling case we can” for Standard & Poor’s (S&P) to restore the Bahamas’ investment grade credit rating.
K P Turnquest, the Deputy Prime Minister, told Tribune Business that the rating agency - which is due to visit the Bahamas before month’s end - will have “a hard time justifying” the continuation of this nation’s’ ‘junk’ status.
He argued that the $2.8 billion in ‘investor indications’, which was almost four times’ the bond offering target, plus recent upward revisions to economic growth numbers provided strong grounds for S&P to upgrade the Bahamas’ rating.
“To me, I think they will have a hard time justifying that strong interest we got against not raising the overall rating,” Mr Turnquest told Tribune Business of S&P. “If we got that kind of interest, our debt must be worth something.
“We’ll certainly be making the most compelling case we can between that and the GDP numbers.”
S&P downgraded the Bahamas’ sovereign creditworthiness to ‘junk’ status at Christmas 2016, citing weaker-than-expected economic growth; a failure to hit fiscal consolidation targets; and the delayed Baha Mar opening as its rationale for doing so.
However, the Minnis administration is clearly hoping that its successful capital raising in the international markets, combined with its the 28 per cent upward revision that took real Bahamian gross domestic product (GDP) to $10.22 billion in 2016, will be enough to sway S&P.
The ‘junk’ downgrade’s impact was felt by the $750 million bond, as the 6 per cent interest rate (price) was some 250 basis points higher than that obtained by the former Christie administration in 2014 - the last time the Government went to the global markets.
The Bahamas obtained a 3.5 per cent interest coupon then because it still had an ‘investment grade’ credit rating, the difference highlighting the damage ‘junk’ status causes through increasing a nation’s debt servicing costs.
Mr Turnquest, meanwhile, told Tribune Business that the $2.8 billion in ‘investor indications’ had generated sufficient demand to push the latest bond’s interest rate down from the originally-forecast 6.25-6.5 per cent.
Acknowledging concerns over the Government’s decision to take on extra foreign currency borrowings, as opposed to seeking funding from the Bahamian capital markets, the Deputy Prime Minister said it had acted based on strategic advice from the Central Bank and other local institutions.
He added that the Minnis administration requires a further $570 million to complete its $1.323 billion funding “envelope”, all of which it intended to place with Bahamian investors.
But, with the $750 million bond’s placement set to take foreign currency debt, as a percentage of the total, from 28 per cent to 30 per cent, Mr Turnquest conceded that “we don’t want to go much higher than that”.
“I think this is just further confirmation that we seem to be on the right path,” Mr Turnquest said of investor response to the $750 million bond. “Both Moody’s and the IMF have made the same general comment that our plan was a reasonable way forward.
“I can tell you that on the roadshow the investor response was overwhelmingly positive. Persons were very interested in learning the policy position of the new government and, to the extent we were able to get interest of $2.8 billion, it is a testament to the fact that the fundamentals of the Bahamas are strong; that the fiscal and growth plan put forward is stable, resulting in more expressions of investor confidence, and we have continued headroom should the need for additional financing arise.”
Mr Turnquest said “some savings” should result from the $750 million bond’s placement with a 6 per cent interest rate. He revealed that the Government’s advisers had initially predicted a coupon of 6.25-6.5 per cent would be required to adequately compensate investors for the risk.
Addressing concerns over why the Government did not turn to the local capital markets first for its financing needs, Mr Turnquest pledged that the ‘balance’ of its $1.323 billion “envelope” would be placed in the Bahamas.
“We’re very sensitive to the liquidity situation,” he said, “and speak to the Central Bank and other investors to make the best possible strategic decision, both for the Government and local investor community.
“We’re still going to have $570 million of financing that needs to be done, in addition to one-off items for various agencies. We believe we’ll be able to absorb quite a bit of that liquidity in the not too distant future. I don’t think it will be an issue once we get around to our operations. It is our view to place all of that locally.”
Observers such as former finance minister, James Smith, have expressed concerns that the decision to pay-out $300 million in short-term Bahamian dollar loans and Treasury Bills with the bond’s US dollars will increase the Bahamas’ foreign currency debt to unwanted levels.
Mr Turnquest conceded that while the Government was “comfortable” with the bond’s impact on the Bahamas’ foreign debt holdings, it was continually monitoring its ratio to the total debt.
“It was about 28 per cent,” he told Tribune Business of the foreign currency debt ratio, “and with this transaction it takes it to, at most, 30 per cent.
“We are constantly monitoring this thing. This is about where we want to be. We certainly don’t want to go much more than that, so we’re comfortable at this level.”
Comments
bogart says...
Repaying at 3.5 interest to now 6% interest and raising foreign currency debt ratio from about 28% to most 30% does not sound more compelling. And for the govt to be getting a rate of 6% FROM the private sector where over 90 - 99% of non govt companies on BISX are yeilding less than 6% is well ........
Posted 17 November 2017, 12:25 p.m. Suggest removal
HonestTruth says...
@Bogart, the 3.5% rating was in 2014 when we had an investment grade credit rating. I don’t know if you are willfully daft or if you just overlooked that part.
Posted 17 November 2017, 2:04 p.m. Suggest removal
bogart says...
@HonestTruth, I dont normally respond to persons who do not have english as a first language or who chooses to throw rocks and stones instead.I said repaying at 3.5% to NOW6%.
We are paying more because of our present junk rating which is worse. I trust you understand.
Keep up with your comments and lets try to move this country forward.
Posted 17 November 2017, 6:40 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"*#“To me, I think they will have a hard time justifying that strong interest we got against not raising the overall rating,” Mr Turnquest told Tribune Business of S&P. “If we got that kind of interest, our debt must be worth something.*"
What's the basis for their rating though, is it what people think about us or what the numbers say about us?
Posted 18 November 2017, 2:03 a.m. Suggest removal
Well_mudda_take_sic says...
This additional foreign currency borrowings of US$750 million (US$750,000,000) until November 2028 at starting variable interest rate of 6% per annum at a time when interest rates are expected to increase significantly over the next decade is not good news at all - instead its a royal shafting thanks to the incompetent comedic duo of K P Turnquest and Marlon Johnson!
Posted 18 November 2017, 2:09 p.m. Suggest removal
sheeprunner12 says...
This is a far better deal than what we were getting under Halkitis & Christie ........ We have to dig our way out of the Baaa rating first and then try and re-negotiate these interest rates down as we go ....... But it starts with the heavy lifting of accountability, right-sizing, and FDI upturns...... We must give KPT a thumbs-up for his efforts so far........ Despite the noise of the Opposition.
Posted 18 November 2017, 3:15 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
It's amazing how even the simple things get twisted by party colors
"*junk’ downgrade’s impact was felt by the $750 million bond, as the 6 per cent interest rate (price) was some 250 basis **HIGHER** THAN THAT OBTAINED BY the former Christie administration in 2014 - the last time the Government went to the global markets.*"
Posted 18 November 2017, 9:44 p.m. Suggest removal
BahamaPundit says...
Fake News. I'm not a banker, but it seems more than likely that the reason for the international interest and demand in our bonds was due to the large interest (6%) being paid, not due to the Bahamas being in great fiscal shape.
Posted 21 November 2017, 2:13 a.m. Suggest removal
Reality_Check says...
Precisely!
Posted 22 November 2017, 11:18 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment