‘Cut civil service wage bill by $70M‘

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The IMF has urged the Government to slash the civil service wage bill by almost $70 million, as it slammed the Christie administration’s “lax spending controls” pre-general election.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its full Article IV report on the Bahamas, revealed that the Government could save taxpayers more than $200 million annually through a combination of public service downsizing and pension reform, plus reduced subsidies to state-owned corporations.

It recommended reducing the civil service wage bill to 2015-2016 levels “at most”, arguing that this would result in savings equivalent to 0.8 per cent of Bahamian gross domestic product (GDP).

Highlighting just how bloated the public service became as the Christie administration removed all hiring constraints in its desperate bid for re-election, an IMF graphic showed that the civil service wage bill for the 2017-2018 fiscal year equals close 8.5 per cent of GDP - compared to a 7 per cent average for the 2005-2016 period.

The difference between the two is roughly $120.6 million, using the same $8.4 billion total GDP estimate that the IMF would have employed prior to the recent near-28 per cent upward revision from the Department of Statistics.

“The public sector wage bill increased sharply in fiscal year 2017,” the IMF’s Article IV report said. “Staff recommended reducing the wage bill to, at most, the level observed in fiscal year 2016, which would yield savings of 0.8 per cent of GDP—relative to fiscal year 2018— including by reducing non-essential temporary workers (about 30-40 per cent of public employees), enacting a hiring freeze, and capping compensation for re-hired pensioners.”

The IMF’s ‘0.8 per cent of GDP’ is, using the Department of Statistics’ former $8.4 billion figure, equivalent to a $67.2 million cut in the civil service wage bill. Using the Department’s revised $10.22 billion GDP, though, would result in a higher $81.76 million slash.

The Fund’s recommendations and data illustrate the scale of the fiscal dilemma confronting the Minnis administration, following a week in which the Deputy Prime Minister said the 2016-2017 deficit had soared to $595 million - and counting - compared to his previous $500 million estimate.

While the bloated civil service clearly needs to be reduced to a more appropriate size, cuts of the nature recommended by the IMF could have a devastating impact - both on the individuals affected and their families, plus the wider economy from the loss of income and spending power.

As a result, the Government is likely to be reluctant to cut too deeply, too quickly, and its policy approach to-date indicates it will implement a more gradual approach to reducing its wage bill by not re-hiring workers whose contracts have expired or replacing persons who have left.

Still, based on austerity measures announced so far, the Minnis administration appears to be following the IMF’s Article IV report almost to ‘the letter’. The hiring freeze, reductions in temporary workers and capping remuneration for re-hired pensioners have all been implemented, along with the 10 per cent ‘across-the-board’ cut to recurrent spending.

The IMF, meanwhile, also recommended that the Government could generate savings equivalent to 1.25 per cent of GDP if it also reduced subsidies to state-owned corporations back to the 2005-2016 average.

To achieve this, though, it suggested that Bahamians would pay the price in other ways, namely an increase in the fees charged by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for the services they provide.

“Sizeable transfers to state-owned enterprises (SOEs)—reaching 2.1 per cent of GDP in fiscal year 2016—continue to be a drain on the budget,” the IMF’s Article IV report said. “SOEs represent also a significant contingent liability for the central government, with their combined debt reaching 18 per cent of GDP in 2016.

“Reducing subsidies and transfers to the historical average would yield savings of up to 1.25 per cent of GDP relative to fiscal year 2018. To this end, staff recommended adjusting prices of services provided by SOEs to cost recovery levels, and restructuring these corporations and other public entities to improve their efficiency. A first essential step is the establishment of effective financial oversight over these corporations.”

A key reason why the likes of Bahamas Power & Light (BPL) and the Water & Sewerage Corporation, for example, both lose between $20-$30 million per annum is because their services are priced ‘below cost’ - meaning the prices charged to consumers are insufficient to cover their operating costs.

While following the IMF’s advice would appear to make economic sense, the Government will be alive to the political implications of forcing Bahamians to pay increased service charges as opposed to funding such losses via the taxpayer. However, the end result is that those not using services from the likes of the Water & Sewerage Corporation are subsidising those who do.

Using an $8.4 billion GDP, and 1.3 per cent savings yield projected by the IMF, the Article IV report projected that following its ‘subsidy’ cut recommendation would save taxpayers $109.2 million annually.

It added that subsidies and transfer payments to state-owned corporations had increased from an average of just over 6 per cent between 2006 and 2015 to around 7.25 per cent this fiscal year. The Government confirmed in the Budget that $429 million in funding had been allocated to SOEs this fiscal year.

Finally, the IMF recommended that the Government require civil servants to share the burden of financing their own retirement income. This is currently borne 100 per cent by the Government, a position that is viewed as unsustainable and a ‘ticking timebomb’ for the country’s fiscal position.

“Civil servants have a non-contributory pension scheme. Pension payments have trended up to an estimated 1.1 per cent of GDP in fiscal year 2017, and population aging will increase them further,” the IMF warned.

“Staff recommended transforming the civil servants’ pension system into a contributory regime in the near term, with contributions commensurate with benefits, and with a view to move to a defined-contribution scheme in the medium term. Setting contributions at 5 per cent of wages for pensionable employees could yield revenues for 0.3 per cent of GDP.”

The saving would be equivalent to $25.2 million per annum, based on an $8.4 billion GDP and the IMF’s figures. The KPMG accounting firm previously estimated the unfunded, ‘pay-as-you-go’, civil service pension liabilities at around $1.5 billion. These liabilities are set to increase to $2.5 billion by 2022, and $4.1 billion by 2032, unless reforms are enacted.

Collectively, the three reforms cited by the IMF - a reduced civil service wage bill, lower subsidies and contributory civil service pension reforms - would save Bahamian taxpayers a total $201.6 million per annum, significantly narrowing the fiscal deficit.

It argued that the three initiatives would enable the Minnis administration to meet its deficit reduction targets, and help contain its recurrent or fixed-cost spending. The Fund also warned that its objective of reducing the deficit to $323 million, or 3.5 per cent of GDP, for 2017-2018, followed by further falls to 2.3 per cent and 1.1 per cent in subsequent years, were “more optimistic” than its own forecasts.

“Staff projects [direct government] debt to peak at 73.3 per cent of GDP in fiscal year 2018, reflecting the impact of [Hurricane Matthew] and lax expenditure control before the general elections in May, and only to fall by half a percentage point over the medium term under modest consolidation efforts,” the IMF said.

“Under modest consolidation efforts, which would bring the fiscal deficit down to about 2.25 per cent of GDP in the medium term, the debt would only stabilize at around 73 per cent of GDP in 2022. This baseline scenario assumes dissipation of hurricane-related spending and expiration of temporary tax relief measures, restraints in current expenditure, and revenue increases from ongoing efforts to improve tax administration and collection.

“There are significant downside risks to the fiscal outlook, with a combination of adverse shocks putting the debt on an upward trajectory. The debt sustainability heat map points to moderate to high risks to debt sustainability.”

Comments

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Why is it the IMF never just outright tells our government to stop borrowing in order for our nation to avert looming financial disaster?!

Posted 10 October 2017, 11:28 a.m. Suggest removal

OMG says...

Try Eleuthera, where clinics have 52 week employees doing little or nothing, or extra security and and janitors in the schools, or hundreds of thousands spent on ripping a huge hill before foundations can even start for the dreamland hospital. Why hire Cuban teachers when there are trained unemployed Bahamians teachers.Why not retrain or take qualified Bahamians in the community for teaching ? The last administration only wanted to keep their cushy jobs and crooked contracts and now everyone will pay the price. How Brave Davies has the absolute balls to even consider leadership of the PLP when he is as inefficient and self serving as the rest is beyond belief.

Posted 10 October 2017, 12:18 p.m. Suggest removal

John says...

Basically the IMF is telling toe government to cut its employees by about five thousand. To do that in a time when unemployment is still in double digits will be suicidal to any government. So what are the options: Well the government can stimulate the economy to get it moving and growing. If it can get the private sector to absorb 2000-3000 of these workers with a significant growth in the economy they there may be no need to get rid of the remaining workers. but the economic growth must be sustainable. And with so much of the world economy in turmoil how doable is it? Growing the food and manufacturing (production) sectors may be one key. And exporting workers where necessary (to storm ravaged areas) may be another.

Posted 10 October 2017, 2:02 p.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

The civil service is staffed with 40% temporary/weekly/contract workers ........ do an audit and send the excess home .......... There are too many persons in the civil service who have worked 30-40 years with NO justifiable need to be there ....... do an audit and send the excess home ........ There are too many re-hirees and consultants still in the civil service ...... do an audit and send the excess home .......... WAS THERE NOT AN HR AUDIT DONE LAST MONTH???????

If that formula is done, the civil service can be cut by by at least 25% and save $200 million.

Posted 10 October 2017, 3:57 p.m. Suggest removal

BahamaPundit says...

First of all, the IMF is not ordering anyone to do anything. Our government is broke!!!!! Bahamians don't seem to comprehend this, for whatever reason (only God knows why). The IMF is just advising our Government how to get their house in order before the s _ _ t hits the fan.

Posted 10 October 2017, 6:20 p.m. Suggest removal

OMG says...

Very true but so many ignorant Bahamians think there is a magic money tree growing somewhere and have an I'm alright jack attitude. The drug days of free flowing dollars are over yet many Bahamians spend up to the hilt on non essentials. I think that even die hard PLP's are getting worried.

Posted 11 October 2017, 8:09 a.m. Suggest removal

Economist says...

The Bahamas Government knows this. The PLP government knew it.
However, it is the FNM Government will have to take actions to reduce the civil service.

Posted 10 October 2017, 8:38 p.m. Suggest removal

Socrates says...

i don't see government acting on this advice.. probably has to happen over time, but is history is anything to go by, i wouldn't hold my breath. Unfortunately, we have come to a stage in this country where there are no easy or simple decisions.. the time for that passed and we did nothing. Its only bitter medicine going forward... too bad....

Posted 11 October 2017, 9:01 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

The Government has a couple of choices. It can do what is being advised and have to deal with the political fall out from the increased unemployment. If can not do it and then be forced to raise revenue by increasing taxes. This will also lead to political fall out. It can stick its head in the sand and hope things will get better somehow (being doing this one for a while).

I favour reducing the civil service as it is grossly overstaffed. Yes this will mean jobs will be lost, but how many jobs have been lost due to the private sector having to divert money to pay increased taxes, or losing sales as potential customers buy less as the Government takes more of their money.

Posted 11 October 2017, 9:52 a.m. Suggest removal

Itellya says...

Get rid of the many double dippers in government who are clogging up the system and some of which are intentionally preventing others from promotions. To be clear I'm referring to those who retired from one government agency and currently receiving FULL pension and a FULL salary AGAIN from government. Start with that!

Posted 11 October 2017, 10 a.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

Agreed ............ And also start by repealing the Parliamentarians' Pension Act and stop paying retired MPs and Cabinet Ministers and PMs and their spouses full salaries for life ....... Pay them the same as the civil service rate

Posted 11 October 2017, 10:31 a.m. Suggest removal

DDK says...

Why pay them pensions at all? When their term is finished, it is finished. Might inspire a few folk to go into politics to actually help their country.

Posted 11 October 2017, 3:02 p.m. Suggest removal

John says...

Some of the dumbest comments... stop paying retired MO's and cabinet ministers? 'Ignorant Bahamians '? Sounds like Donald Trump say 'we will have to write off Puerto Rico's debt, all of it. That was a given considering the condition the island nation was left in after the devastating hurricane. Unless and until the economy gets moving and until there is real growth in the economy then most of the suggestions you make are temporary or ineffective. If you have an orange you can cut off the spoiling part as much as you like. It will continue to rot so you need s new orange, a new and blossoming economy.

Posted 11 October 2017, 11:33 a.m. Suggest removal

proudloudandfnm says...

With 35 years of the PLP buying votes with government jobs all I can say is....
Duh....

Posted 11 October 2017, 2:23 p.m. Suggest removal

Truism says...

The IMF has had how many success stories?Less than an F average, (BGCSE), and yet we are considering their recommendations as credible. WOW!

Posted 11 October 2017, 6:02 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment