Monday, September 18, 2017
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
Bahamian companies will be "put out of business" if exchange controls and bank lending rates are not relaxed before this nation enters liberalised trade regimes.
Robert Myers, a principal with the Organisation for Responsible Governance (ORG), told Tribune Business that local businesses will be "unable to compete" with foreign rivals unless the Government places them on a level playing field by removing such structural obstacles.
With the Bahamas already having signed on to the European Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the European Union (EU), Mr Myers said both the Government and private sector had not been proactive enough in positioning the economy to grow and compete under rules-based trading regimes.
He argued that Bahamian companies must have a chance to "expand into foreign markets" ahead of more local industries being opened up to foreign rivals, especially if this nation proceeds with accession to full World Trade Organisation (WTO) membership.
Speaking after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) last week suggested that the Bahamas implement a low-rate income tax "over the medium term", to compensate for revenues lost as result of EPA and WTO-related tariff reductions, Mr Myers reiterated that tax reform should not be dictated by one factor.
Instead, he argued that any reforms should be geared towards improving the Bahamian economy's competitiveness and that of local businesses.
"We've got to look at our tax structure, but not just to increase government revenues," Mr Myers told Tribune Business. "We've been very reactive towards the EPA and WTO, and not getting out ahead of it to provide opportunities for the private sector and citizens.
"There is no doubt that there is a need to carefully examine our tax structure and monetary policies ahead of the nation's full integration into WTO and EPA. Both ORG and the CRT (the Chamber of Commerce's Coalition for Responsible Taxation) have been encouraging the Government to be far more proactive in meeting these demands, so as to allow Bahamians an opportunity to expand their businesses into foreign markets ahead of foreigners being permitted to unfairly compete with Bahamians in the Bahamas."
Mr Myers specifically added that "exchange controls and the high cost of debt are two significant hurdles that the Government must address as it examines its tax options".
He said the relatively high cost of capital for Bahamian companies, compared to their foreign and regional counterparts, placed them at an immediate competitive disadvantage when bidding for work and projects in this nation and outside.
"If the cost of debt [interest rate] here is 8.5 per cent, and that guy is going out to compete in the Bahamas and regionally, and some guy in Jamaica or Europe is borrowing at 2 per cent, how is that guy going to compete in the WTO and EPA era," Mr Myers asked.
"They (foreigners) can transact internationally, but exchange controls eat up more of our time, slow us down and cost us more of our money. The Government should be looking at ways to get Bahamians to expand our horizons and grow our economy; not just locally, but regionally.
"Let's take advantage of these agreements, and start being proactive, not reactive. I've said to the Government on numerous occasions over the last eight years that they've got to relax exchange controls and improve bank lending rates before that [WTO] happens, otherwise we will not be able to compete and they will put Bahamian businesses out of business. Give us a chance to compete before foreigners come in here."
The Central Bank of the Bahamas has been moving to gradually relax exchange controls, and provide Bahamian businesses with access to foreign currency financing, especially those in sectors seen as having particular development and exchange earning potential.
The Government in April approved measures that will enable Bahamian businesses to access up to $5 million in foreign currency financing every five years, a measure designed to aid small and medium-sized businesses and the "upper end" of the real estate market.
The reforms are targeted at 11 sectors seen as supporting the Bahamas' medium to long-term national development goals, and having a positive impact on the country's foreign exchange earning capability.
Those industries are: Agriculture and fisheries; manufacturing; transport (land, sea and air); tourism (hotels and restaurants); construction and real estate for residential tourism; energy and energy conservation; education; health; telecommunications; ICT; and infrastructure.
"The focus has got to be on the ways to stimulate growth of the private sector, and improve opportunities for citizens to earn more through greater knowledge, productivity and efficiency," Mr Myers told Tribune Business.
"Commercial banks should be aggressively encouraged to reduce interest rates, as this will improve the cost of doing business and stimulate business development. At the same time they must avoid further lending to unqualified borrowers as current bank default rates are too high."
Comments
sealice says...
how can anyone have done more then the PLP when it comes to giving away money at no charge???? we should be ready to go for the entire alphabet soup after years and years of the PLP "lending" money at no charge.....
Posted 18 September 2017, 4:11 p.m. Suggest removal
observer2 says...
Hi Robbi, your points are spot on but nobody in the government is actually listening or remotely understands the issues. I'll try in 4 examples in case some government MP is actually humble enough to read these valuable blogs.
1. Exchange control fees. A parent of a college student has to wire $300 to their child in college in the US. The bank and the government charges them $60 which equates to a full days pay for the parent. If the parent had an account in the US it would cost $0.
2.I am constructing a house in the Bahamas. I buy all the materials at Home Depot and pay VAT once on the shipment. If my Contractor buys the materials in Florida he has to pay VAT twice, if he buys the stuff locally he has to pay it 3 times. The cash flows don't work as VAT is paid up front so their is no recover for me....the poor black consumer.
3.If am saving for retirement i have to buy 14 mostly terrible Bahamian stocks. If I am a foreigner I can invest in the US stock market which has thousands of stocks to choose from and is going up every day.
4.If I am a foreign investor I can borrow at 3% in US dollars, if I am a Bahamian investor I have to pay 9%...if the bank will take the risk...by the way i'm black and poor...so I just ain ga get no damn loan from Royal.
I guess I ga just have to stay black and poor under the PLP or FNM.
Posted 18 September 2017, 6:48 p.m. Suggest removal
TheMadHatter says...
Pass by ANY Chinese store in Nassau and you will see loads of Bahamians lined up spending money in there. Giving their money to the Chinese to send out of the country. Bahamians DON'T WANT money. How that place on Carmichael get so big? Bahamians are basically selling their children's future in order to save $20 a week on food costs.
Posted 19 September 2017, 10:12 a.m. Suggest removal
Economist says...
The idea is to keep Bahamians down. A subservient Bahamian will always have to go to the politician. This way the politicians remain in control.
Posted 18 September 2017, 8:33 p.m. Suggest removal
observer2 says...
Absolutely correct. Also, keep us poor, black and dumb with a D average in school and almost all the school buildings needing to be condemned because they are not renovated.
The rich foreigners, bay street and east street boys and their bought out PLP and FNM cronies don't care because they live in their gated communities, don't pay BEC, have their kids at the best schools in the US, run retail and oil monopolicies and control the government.
Posted 18 September 2017, 8:59 p.m. Suggest removal
TheMadHatter says...
You ought to be careful mentioning oil monopolies. You notice I never do. Everyone knows about that - there is just not the will of the people to do anything about it - that's why the politicians don't because they know the people will not back them up. High power bills are a hidden form of taxation. With duty averaging 25%, VAT at 10%, and NIB at 10%, and fuel for vehicles and BPL "fuel surcharge" at 30% - a $100 paycheck translates into a USA equivalent of $25. That is why everything "seems" so expensive. Things are not actually expensive - you just pay more taxes on them than is generally realized.
You may doubt my calculations above - but ask yourself this. Is someone who makes $300 a week able to save even $5 out of that $25 mentioned above? $300 would yield three times $5 = $15. How many people who make $300 a week do you know who are actually saving $15 a week in their bank/numbers account?
Posted 19 September 2017, 10:24 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment