CIBC 'disagrees' with fines by the Bahamas

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

CIBC FIrstCaribbean has expressed its displeasure at fines imposed by Bahamian regulators in documents for its planned $240 million initial public offering (IPO) in New York.

The bank, in a section of the IPO document detailing regulatory risks, said it "disagreed" with two sanctions levied in the Bahamas last year that took total fines for 2017 to $78,000.

"Our failure to comply with... laws and regulations, even if the failure follows good faith effort or reflects a difference in interpretation, could subject us to restrictions on our business activities, fines and other penalties, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations, capital base and the price of our securities," CIBC FirstCaribbean told potential investors.

"Recently we have seen an increase in regulatory fines related to reporting that are typically [caused by] data errors regardless of materiality. In 2015, we paid regulatory fines in an aggregate amount of $1,675; in 2016 we paid no regulatory fines; and in 2017 we paid $77,800 in regulatory fines in the aggregate, which was primarily due to two fines in the Bahamas.

"We disagree with the fines imposed in the Bahamas in 2017, and so cannot assure you whether or not these types of fines were isolated incidents or will continue. In many of the countries in which we operate, we must seek regulatory approval to make material changes to our business such as make investments or pay dividends."

CIBC FirstCaribbean, in documents filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), confirmed it is offering 9.6 million shares to investors at a price between $22-$25 per share - pegging the value at between $211 million to $240 million.

The issue's underwriters have also agreed to purchase 1.44 million shares and, if they take this up, CIBC's majority ownership stake in its Caribbean subsidiary will drop from 91.67 per cent to 70.67 per cent. If they elect not to do this, the Canadian bank's equity interest will fall to 73.41 per cent as it initiates a strategy to seemingly gradually exit the region.

FIrstCaribbean will remain listed on the Barbados Stock Exchange, but is delisting in the eastern Caribbean and Trinidad & Tobago. However, it will retain its Bahamas International Securities Exchange (BISX) listing, with the regional parent owning more than 95 per cent of its Bahamian subsidiary.

Anthony Blackman, a FirstCaribbean spokesperson, told Tribune Business via e-mail: "Nothing changes for our Bahamas shareholders who hold shares in FirstCaribbean International Bank Bahamas Limited."

Acknowledging the Bahamas' importance to its overall operations, CIBC First Caribbean's IPO document said: "We are a market leader in the Bahamas with approximately 18 per cent of the total market deposits and 21 per cent of the total market loans, according to our calculations based on June 2017 data published by the Central Bank of the Bahamas.

"Our market shares for corporate loans in our primary markets of Barbados, the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands were 43 per cent, 30 per cent and 50 per cent, respectively, and for corporate deposits were 29 per cent, 20 per cent and 20 per cent, respectively."

Comments

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

What a slap in the face of the Minnis-led FNM government! Here we see CIBC First Caribbean choosing a US$240 million **foreign** IPO, essentially telling us one or more of three things: (1) It is not interested in any additional Bahamian ownership; (2) Bahamians lack the wealth necessary to subscribe to, and fully take up, the share offering; and/or (3) the state of of our country's foreign exchange reserves is such that our government and the Central Bank cannot afford to let Bahamians participate in this foreign IPO. Truly sad!

Posted 12 April 2018, 4:50 p.m. Suggest removal

JohnDoe says...

You are either a mischief maker of the highest order spreading poisonous vitriol and misinformation or a paid useful idiot and troll. CIBC actions have absolutely nothing to do with the Bahamas and everything to do with their overall Caribbean business model. Stop it! You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

Posted 15 April 2018, 7:30 a.m. Suggest removal

bogart says...

....Well as to who started the slapping first, the govt did allow the then unregulated web shops to deposit funds worth the BoB controlled by the govt and knowing the Candaian banks policy of not taking these funds the Clearing banks had to take in these funds via clearing to settle transactions, and the continuous operation of the govt controlled bank despite not meeting international and lawfull tier 1 & 2 ratos while the other banks follow the law anf paid their bills to compete, then the govt did prop up via injectoons of taxpayers funds into this bank to carry on competing, and dod buy shares roghts despite free enterprise market forces not buying then, and then again by Resolve taking out bad loans paying taxpayers money over paying for assets valued less by Chairman amd even less by others, all this done in a supposedly free market forcces for all and approved by govt controlled Central Bank which held an overabundance of govt securities and through the Central Bank even owns 40% of Bisx the mediun which all banks trade shares free market forces prevailing.....of course this is all pure speculation

Posted 12 April 2018, 5:39 p.m. Suggest removal

JohnDoe says...

Your post is evidence of our F average. You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. Please do some research and try to understand before just posting nonsense.

Posted 15 April 2018, 7:33 a.m. Suggest removal

sheeprunner12 says...

Is it true that Scotiabank is about to downsize more of its branches this year .......... wtf???

Posted 12 April 2018, 8:03 p.m. Suggest removal

bogart says...

All banks and businesses expect to make profits AND grow and become bigger, increase their share of the market, obtain better synergies, ecnomies. Some may have made sacrifices to maintain certain positions to a point where they then run ahead. They have business plans to grow to prosper etc

They pay licence fees and expect laws rules regulations, conditions, free market conditions to exist. They compete for business to make profits and grow and they aim to please their shareholders in delivering good performance, products services....
Those which are not as capable of fair competition in following and adbiding by the same rules and regulations as others, falter, fail lose market share and others who are more capable grow increase market share which is the way of free market system.

Posted 13 April 2018, 1:15 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment