Taxation 'veil piercing' endangers businesses

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

Private sector representatives yesterday warned that the Government's 'piercing of the corporate veil' to force tax compliance could "place businesses in jeopardy".

Edison Sumner, the Bahamas Chamber of Commerce and Employers Confederation's (BCCEC) chief executive, confirmed to Tribune Business there had been complaints from businesses over the Government's tactic of withholding essential permits/approvals until their shareholders settled tax liabilities owed in a personal capacity.

Mr Sumner said this was not a practice the Chamber "necessarily agrees with", and it would "have to take up" the matter with the Minnis administration during talks scheduled to take place over the next several weeks.

He was backed by the Chamber's chairman, Michael Maura, who questioned whether it was "appropriate" for different government agencies to act as "tax policemen" for their counterparts when there was nothing in law empowering them to do so.

He warned that holding a business 'hostage' until an individual shareholder settled their personal tax liabilities could "jeopardise" the company's future, and that of its employees, by denying it the permits it needs to conduct normal commerce. The Chamber duo spoke out after Tribune Business was contacted by Mike Lightbourn, Coldwell Banker Lightbourn Realty's president, who revealed that his firm had been unable to obtain exchange control approvals and Tax Compliance Certificates (TCCs) because of alleged personal real property tax liabilities associated with land he does not own. "They're withholding a TCC because they say I owe property tax for some property which I don't own," Mr Lightbourn told this newspaper. "I'm not the only one; loads of people have that issue.

"I also can't get exchange control approval because they say I owe property tax. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with exchange control. I'm not able to get exchange control clearance, and I can't get a Tax Compliance Certificate for a property I'm selling because I owe property tax elsewhere supposedly, so the sale can't close. It's all over the place."

The 'cross-referencing' between government departments is part of a strategy to enhance enforcement/compliance, and crack down on tax cheats and avoiders, by denying essential permits such as TCCs, National Insurance Board (NIB) 'letters of good standing', and exchange control permission.

Without such permits, the business interests of tax defaulters will grind to a halt through an inability to renew Business Licences and other certificates essential to the smooth conduct of commerce.

It is unclear, though, whether there is any basis in law for the Government to intermingle company and personal tax liabilities by 'piercing the corporate veil' to enforce payment. And holding a business 'hostage' until its owners settle their personal tax debts could endanger its survival, increasing unemployment at the very moment the Government is desperate for increased GDP growth.

"We have heard these complaints," Mr Sumner told Tribune Business, "and I think it has something to do with the fact that if you are a shareholder of some significance in a company, and you owe taxes in your personal capacity, that is considered a liability against the company.

"They [the Government] will then withhold a certificate or licence from that company if a significant shareholder has a tax liability with the Government. It's not a policy we necessarily agree with. The Government has put it in place to ensure all companies and individuals are responsible to pay taxes to the Government."

Mr Sumner agreed that this amounted to "piercing the veil" of corporate ownership, as the Government made the issuance of TCCs and such like contingent on shareholders paying their due taxes to ensure there is "no adverse effect on the company".

"If you are in business, as we understand it, and you owe the Government for any taxes outstanding to them, whether personal tax or corporate tax, they have a right to withhold licences to you until those taxes are satisfied," he added.

"It's a policy we have to look at. There's been mixed reaction to it. It is a matter that has come up, and we are hoping we can raise it in future meetings and discussions with the Government in the course of the next several weeks. This is something we will have to take up as part of those discussions."

Mr Maura confirmed he had heard similar private sector complaints, revealing: "We have had members that have shared that, as part of the process or where you are trying to get 'certificates of good standing', TCCs, the Government seems to have gone out and looked at every contract and interest a person has to make sure that person is compliant, and they've gone past the veil of the business.

"It becomes a concern to the private sector as it seems every other department has become a police agent for every other department. We don't believe that to be appropriate."

The Chamber chairman pointed out that many companies had multiple shareholders, sometimes numbering in the hundreds and even thousands, making it unfair to penalise a firm for the 'sins' of just one person.

"You're basically placing the business in jeopardy," Mr Maura told Tribune Business. "You could have a business that has 20 shareholders, 100 shareholders. Is it right? Is it in the country's best interests?

"You jeopardise the income and future earning potential of labour as a result of going past that corporate veil with a particular shareholder who may be one person out of 10. It doesn't seem to be appropriate."

Mr Maura also revealed that "there has been a practice" where companies had had to pay disputed Value-Added Tax (VAT) systems to the Department of Inland Revenue before they are granted an appeal hearing, which he described as "just unacceptable".

He added, though, that the Government was moving to address these concerns by having timely dispute hearings. "What we've been hearing the last few months is that the Department of Inland Revenue, the Ministry of Finance, have heard the cry and are committed to working with businesses and help. That will allow everyone to get on the same page," Mr Maura said.

K P Turnquest, deputy prime minister and minister of finance, and Marlon Johnson, acting financial secretary, could not be reached for comment before press time.

Comments

The_Oracle says...

The issue they (Govt) has is no cross platform software compatibility between departments, forcing the public to run from Govt dept. to dept. collecting Certificates of good standing to get anything from any given dept.
A background but critical issue is the security tiering that would have to be integral to any software platform accessibility cross departmentally,which means re-organizing the various Govt. departments themselves for general security tiering of staff.
You can't have level one staff over here accessing level 5 stuff over there.
The denial of service due to funds owed is an outgrowth of Government incompetence in tax collection. Should be tested in the courts.

Posted 2 February 2018, 5:05 p.m. Suggest removal

TheMadHatter says...

I agree completely with putting some energy behind tax collection - but you cannot use information about who the shareholders are in a limited company. Doing so defeats the purpose of having a limited company - and as this information makes its way into the international investment community - it will hurt investment. Tax exchange treaty countries will jump on this bandwagon quickly and any FDI we get here will quickly dry up as fast as it comes in - if an investor owes any taxes back in their country.

Companies are companies. Bending the law is not a good way to improve the law. We already have enough uncertainty surrounding investment in this country by both foreigners and Bahamians alike. Again, I understand the need for tax collection - but this is without any doubt a step too far.

VAT needs to go to 8% right away. That would be much less painless than this and other silly kinds of nitpicking. Also place a 25% tax on all money transfers except to schools, hospitals, and product suppliers that can be identified as bonafide. We need to stop all these silly "sending money to my family in (insert name of s.h. country here)." 25%. We need to decide if we want to be a rich country or a poor country. Just like you wouldn't tell your children to hang out with other kids who do drugs, for fear your child may start doing drugs - we need to STOP "hanging out" with all these poor countries. Let them buy their own baby food.

Posted 2 February 2018, 5:29 p.m. Suggest removal

bcitizen says...

Is this even legal? What is the point of having a limited corporation if the individual share holders private actions can affect the company? A corporation is an entity unto itself. This is like the government denying you a business license because your brother or someone you are affiliated with owes taxes.

Posted 3 February 2018, 8:12 a.m. Suggest removal

ohdrap4 says...

what if the janitress has a loan at furniture minus?

Posted 4 February 2018, 5:36 p.m. Suggest removal

bogart says...

In having a limited corporation there is still the bank connection in that the banks require personal guarrantees and with that taxes being a first charge agsinst the banks collateral they have you for business and personal assets......
Look at it dis way the govt and the banks are bonded together bby way of govt loans, govt overdraft, consortium of banks giving mega loans for govt harbour, govt projects,
There are little protections for businesses or citizenns. .. ...Businesses can afford lawyers and perhaps even better ones at least...and dont rry transferring assets....its tracible.....

Posted 5 February 2018, 3:17 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment