Call to prevent expansion of shanty towns

By AVA TURNQUEST

Tribune Chief Reporter

aturnquest@tribunemedia.net

THE government is working on an enforcement plan to prevent the expansion of shanty towns in the country, according to Labour Minister Dion Foulkes yesterday.

Mr Foulkes said officials will be careful not to breach the Supreme Court order that prohibits the government from dismantling those communities pending a judicial review.

“We are speaking to the Ministry of Works and also to the police to work out a mechanism to ensure that that happens,” he said outside the Cabinet Office. “We do not want to breach the overall order so we have to be judicious in how we approach that.”

The government was granted a variation of the August 2018 injunction blocking evictions and service disconnections in an order filed on March 14.

The adjusted order prevents those residents from altering or expanding those communities unless in compliance with the Building Regulation Act.

The government sought a variation of the order in October 2018, claiming it was made aware that certain residents or occupiers of shanty towns in New Providence had “continued to engage in the construction, erection and alteration of buildings or structures” within those areas without obtaining building permits, in violation of the Buildings Regulations Act. It said such activities “injure the public interest in the proper enforcement of planning laws, creates risk to human safety by the construction of sub-standard housing, and is detrimental to the orderly development and use of the environment.”

Last August, Supreme Court Justice Cheryl Grant-Thompson ordered the government and utility providers to halt any planned service disconnections or evictions in shanty towns pending a judicial review of the Minnis administration’s policy to eradicate those communities.

The injunction prohibits the government, directly or through its agents, appointees or employees, from taking possession of, demolishing any building on, or otherwise interfering with the enjoyment of land in shantytowns in New Providence by the 177 applicants for the judicial review, as well as other residents and occupiers of those communities, by disconnecting any utilities “other than pursuant to the relevant enabling legislation” pending the determination of the action or until further order.

Prime Minister Dr Hubert Minnis, Attorney General Carl Bethel, Mr Foulkes, Public Works Minister Desmond Bannister, Bahamas Power and Light, and the Water and Sewerage Corporation are listed as the respondents.

Non-profit group Respect Our Homes Limited (ROHL), Luanne Nonord and the 177 residents are listed as the applicants.

Comments

Schemer18 says...

When are they gonna have this non compliance issues of the Bahamas building code resolved? These migrants come in the country illegally, & to establish illegal practices. The courts need to stay out of these matters, & to let the Bahamas State Administration handle these matters efficiently.

Posted 21 March 2019, 12:30 a.m. Suggest removal

John says...

If government doesn’t hurry up and fix this economy, the entire island will be a shantytown. Depressing to see the number of abandoned and delapidated buildings, and even some still occupied with battened windows and roofs caving in.

Posted 21 March 2019, 5:06 a.m. Suggest removal

rawbahamian says...

Residents can identify where ALL of the shanty towns are !!! If BPL finds an illegal connection then they simply have to disconnect them at the poles. If the courts say they can't then the bills need to be addressed to the idiot magistrate/judge to satisfy the payment !!! If Haitians don't like how they are treated here then they can exercise their only right as illegals immigrants and that is the right to pack and carry their asses back home !!!

Posted 21 March 2019, 9:47 a.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

LMAO

Posted 21 March 2019, 11:37 a.m. Suggest removal

Islandboy242242 says...

Hold on....If the shanty towns were built outside of *"compliance with the Building Regulation Act"* in the first place; then what makes anyone think the injunction saying that no alterations can be made unless within the *"compliance with the Building Regulation Act"* will be followed???

Posted 21 March 2019, 11:52 a.m. Suggest removal

DDK says...

Expansion? What the h-e-l-l happened to demolition?? Was that an imagined mantra? How long is the Court going to take to make a final ruling on the matter?

Posted 21 March 2019, 12:12 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment