Don't be frightened off WTO reform package

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

The Bahamas must not allow "vested interests and nationalism" to deter it from breaking out of decade-long "stagnation" via broad-based economic reform, a trade expert urged yesterday.

Ramesh Chaitoo, who co-authored the Oxford Economics report on full World Trade Organisation (WTO) membership's likely impact on The Bahamas, told Tribune Business this nation faces significant internal pressures to maintain its economic status quo.

Yet he argued that there was abundant evidence to show The Bahamas is not generating sufficient GDP growth and new jobs through a narrow economic model that has largely remained unchanged for 60 years.

Traditionally reliant on tourism and financial services as its key economic drivers, Mr Chaitoo said The Bahamas and other international financial centres (IFCs) cannot expect to maintain their current business models given the insatiable appetite of developed countries for tax dollars.

The trade policy specialist warned that "a lot of vested interests and nationalism want to keep the same old, same old, but the economy has stagnated for some time so you need other means to stimulate growth".

The Oxford Economics report, released yesterday, said it appeared "low growth rates have become the ‘new norm’ for the Bahamian economy", pointing out that average annual GDP expansion between 2011-2017 averaged a mere 0.6 percent. This represented a "marked slowdown" from the 3.1 percent growth rates achieved prior to the 2008-2009 financial crisis.

"Traditional growth engines of tourism and financial services have been struggling and unemployment remains stubbornly high," the report added, despite the double-digit growth in both stopover and total visitor arrivals to The Bahamas during 2018 and 2019 to-date.

As for financial services, Mr Chaitoo said he expected the regulatory pressures from the likes of the European Union (EU) - which resulted in The Bahamas last year enacting fundamental changes to its business model - to continue with no end in sight.

"I don't think The Bahamas, Vanuatu or Cayman or other international financial centres can expect this business model to continue," he told this newspaper. "I live in Brussels, and every day the Europeans, Canadians and US are looking for every tax dollar they can find from corporate and private citizens.

"IFCs have to restructure the kinds of business they do, and the smart ones have done it already. Mauritius has done it already, a long time ago, and they're doing things other than being a place for foreigners to hide their cash. Barbados is struggling with that to some extent, and The Bahamas will have to rethink at at some point what it does."

While the Prime Minister had last year met with top EU officials in a bid to further protect the Bahamian financial services industry, Mr Chaitoo said the Europeans were "very firm on this issue" notwithstanding the fact that some of its members - such as Malta - engaged in exactly the same type of business as the IFCs that Brussels is targeting.

The Government's decision to seek full WTO membership by a June 2020 target date has already provoked strong resistance from groups such as Bahamians Agitating for a Referendum on Free Trade (BARF) and Bahamians Against WTO, as well as major private sector figures such as Super Value principal, Rupert Roberts.

Several anti-WTO demonstrations have already taken place, and the Oxford Economics report acknowledged there were "legitimate concerns" about WTO's impact - especially for Bahamian manufacturers and small businesses that rely on high tariffs for protection against imported rivals.

Yet with The Bahamas' current economic model not yielding sufficient fruit, Mr Chaitoo and his co-author, Lloyd Barton, recommended that joining the WTO be part of a much broader restructuring and repositioning strategy that created a much-improved business and investment climate in The Bahamas.

"WTO Accession can form part of a successful strategy of structural reform to modernise and liberalise the economy," they wrote. "But there are legitimate concerns amongst the local population around the potential impact of increased international competition on relatively small Bahamian businesses, as well as negative effects on existing trade imbalances and the public finances.

"Decision-makers should manage the levers of market protection and competition in an effort to maximise national economic growth and avoid business and/or sector complacency and inefficiency."

Jeffrey Beckles, the Chamber's chief executive, told Tribune Business yesterday that the report's findings represented "an urgent call to action for The Bahamas". He said the private sector needs to "insist" that the economy's structural weaknesses and bottlenecks be addressed, given that reform in these areas largely depends on the Government.

"It is an urgent call to action for The Bahamas," Mr Beckles said of Oxford Economics' conclusions. "We must insist on a direction for the country, insist we address these deficiencies and insist on economic diversification. It's an urgent call to action, and we must act, and act collectively and with the national interest at heart."

Mr Barton told this newspaper that the study's findings show full WTO membership is not a panacea, or cure-all, for The Bahamas' economic malaise but can be part of the solution if it secures accession terms to its benefit.

"WTO is not going to be a silver bullet for the economy," he emphasised, pointing to areas such as "excessive bureaucracy", the high cost of electricity, legal services and insurance, and labour costs and skills gaps that need to be addressed alongside the separation process.

"They've really come to a head since the financial crisis," Mr Barton said of these deficiencies. "It's becoming quite clear that something needs to change, and the consensus in the business community is that wide-ranging policy reforms are necessary.

"Getting back to WTO, it's not a silver bullet, but if used used alongside local policy reforms, that's how to finally stimulate growth again in this economy."

"What is also clear from our study is that WTO accession alone will not be a panacea for the current problems facing the Bahamian economy," the Oxford Economics study reiterated.

"In order to achieve a sustainable acceleration of growth, policymakers need to embark on a more ambitious and broad-based reform agenda to improve the domestic business environment."

Comments

Chucky says...

How did nationalism become a bad word.
Do we not want to unite.

Are we to forgo our own interests in our families, communities, cities, islands and finally our nation in order of the “greater good” of the world.

nationalism is all we have as Bahamians, why would we give this up.

Posted 8 May 2019, 9:19 a.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Red China seems to be throwing its money everywhere in our society in effort to 'bribe' The Bahamas into joining the WTO. Bahamas membership in the WTO would greatly serve Red China's interests, but not the interests of the Bahamian people. Membership in the WTO would be disastrous for our country and our way of life. We, the Bahamian people, would lose control of just about everything to do with our economy and our country's finances. It would accelerate foreign ownership and/or control of all aspects of commerce within and to and from The Bahamas. Bottom line: Bahamians would be locked in under the WTO as a low cost source of labour for foreign interests.

Posted 8 May 2019, 9:36 a.m. Suggest removal

Chucky says...

Seems our economy much to small to really matter to China.

Everything else you mention is and has been happening without the wto membership

Though I agree 100% that wto membership will be bad for us. We are not a producer in need of more market access. (Which is what they claim those deals to be about)

Sadly it’s really going to be a loss of sovereign control of issues that hits us hardest if we join.

Posted 8 May 2019, 10:05 a.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Red China wants our vote at the WTO table. They want us to side with them against the U.S. on many WTO matters. Pretty much like the One China policy where we must now side with Red China against Taiwan on all U.N. matters. But joining the WTO would come with disastrous consequences for us.

Posted 8 May 2019, 11:18 a.m. Suggest removal

Chucky says...

I'm always amazed at how these deals manage to get done despite all the horrific consequences that seem to be known in advance. Seems there are some (many) that are willing to sellout the rest for some monetary gain.

Posted 8 May 2019, 12:59 p.m. Suggest removal

Hoda says...

Most governments across the world when that issue arose chose to recognize the one China policy.

One China Policy does not mean you have to side with china, it means that we choose to recognize the People Republic of China as the sole China as Taiwan - they are considered separatist by some - and those who do not adopt the policy see them as a sovereign state called the Republics of China

Posted 9 May 2019, 4:58 a.m. Suggest removal

killemwitdakno says...

Do expound on this point.

Posted 8 May 2019, 1:44 p.m. Suggest removal

DDK says...

Frightened OFF, Tribune?

Posted 8 May 2019, 12:50 p.m. Suggest removal

TheMadHatter says...

"and the Oxford Economics report acknowledged there were "legitimate concerns" about WTO's impact..."

Really???? What legitimate concerns? How can they say this when nobody will say what the Hell WTO rules are? This is just outright nonsense and flimflam talk.

Joining the WTO will not be "the Bahamas changing", it will be the Bahamas being forced to change. In other words we are a bunch of dumb negroes that need "Europeans" to come back and take over and show us how to diversify and be transparent.

Really? We are that dumb? Go ahead Zhivargo, sign us up to a declaration of dumbness.

Posted 8 May 2019, 1:37 p.m. Suggest removal

Well_mudda_take_sic says...

Ramesh Chaitoo doesn't known a damn thing about The Bahamas. He's obviously one of those lacking in common sense who would have a most difficult time living and working outside of the protected confines of academia. This entire study is a bunch of malarkey. Anyone who paid for it got royally fleeced.

You know it's a terribly slow news day when The Tribune has to resort to filling its pages with this kind of poppycock.

Posted 8 May 2019, 2:30 p.m. Suggest removal

killemwitdakno says...

Pretty much says you already suck so WTO won't be the only reason.

Separate from who?

Posted 8 May 2019, 2:45 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment