Gov't joins BPC in opposing oil Judicial Review

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

Environmental activists yesterday accused the Government of "jumping the gun" after it filed legal papers opposing their bid to halt oil exploration in Bahamian waters.

Rashema Ingraham, executive director of Waterkeeper Bahamas, told Tribune Business "it goes against normal legal process for Judicial Reviews" for the Attorney General's Office to file a "notice of objection" prior to Justice Hanna-Weekes determining whether the activists' case should proceed.

The Supreme Court is due to make that decision at 11am today, but in its December 22, 2020, "notice", the Attorney General's Office revealed its intention to seek judicial permission to oppose the Judicial Review challenge on three counts.

It cited these as the "delay" in bringing proceedings, a likely reference to the argument that Waterkeepers Bahamas and the Coalition to Protect Clifton Bay (Save the Bays) are out of time as they did not file the Judicial Review within six months of Bahamas Petroleum Company (BPC) obtaining its Environmental Authorisation (EA) in late February 2020.

It is also arguing that the case is "devoid of substantive merit", and urged the Supreme Court not to grant a "stay" that would halt BPC's Perseverance One well in mid-drilling in waters some 90 miles west of Andros.

Thus the Government is now, in effect, backing oil exploration in Bahamian waters even though the Prime Minister and several of his Cabinet ministers have said publicly that they are personally opposed to such activities.

This was not lost on oil exploration opponents. Sam Duncombe, reEarth's president, said in a statement: "Sadly we have a government that is all too happy to roll over and play dead in the face of such shameful tactics [by BPC].

"They are now opposing our Judicial Review application, even though the Prime Minister and several of his ministers have all come out against oil drilling.... It's just bizarre to me. I think they need to get together and talk with one voice. We're very happy to hear ministers open their mouths now, way too late.

"You have to wonder what they are thinking about when they're putting the country at risk, and there's so much confusion in government. It doesn't leave me with the feeling they have a clue what they're doing. Everything is suspect now. One minute it's something, the next minute it's the opposite. Unbelievable. It's truly bizarre."

The so-called "shameful tactics" were BPC's alleged rush to bring the Stena IceMAX drill ship across the Atlantic to The Bahamas and begin drilling even though it knew of the legal threat to its activities, only to now say it is "too late to stop" because of the health, safety and environmental risks.

Mrs Duncombe also argued that the Government and BPC were "jumping the gun" by filing submissions, affidavits and multiple other legal papers with the Supreme Court when the judge had yet to give permission for the Judicial Review to proceed.

BPC, in particular, was not named as a party to the proceedings and will have to apply to get court permission to join the action, as Mrs Duncombe was backed by Ms Ingraham. She added: "The Judicial Review process has not actually begun. For BPC and the Government to be filing affidavits and submissions, it goes against normal legal process for Judicial Reviews."

Meanwhile, BPC's attorneys, UK-based Clare Montgomery QC, and Graham, Thompson & Company's Leif Farquharson and Adrian Hunt, argued in their "skeleton" submissions that Bahamian environmental legislation would be rendered "unworkable" if the oil explorer was required to seek new Environmental Authorisation (EA) every time the drill ship merely changed.

The environmental activists are arguing that the switch to the Stena IceMAX should have required a new EA, and fresh round of public consultation under the new Environmental Planning and Protection Act, but BPC's attorneys are arguing this is unnecessary because it "makes no difference to the environmental impact of the operation".

Pointing out that neither the Petroleum Act 2016 nor the accompanying regulations required a fresh application for approval if the drilling vessel's identity changed, they argued: "The legislation would be unworkable if changes to the identity of personnel, plant and equipment that could make no difference to the environmental impact of the operation required separate consideration and approval by the minister."

BPC's attorneys also sought to refute the activists' assertions that their client required approvals under the Planning and Subdivision Act and Conservation and Protection of the Physical Landscape of The Bahamas Act before starting drilling.

They argued that both Acts referred to activities that took place on land or in the ground, rather than the seabed, which meant that neither a site plan approval nor excavation permit was required by BPC.

The oil explorer also promised that if the Judicial Review is given the go-ahead by the Supreme Court it will demand that the activists pay $100,000 as "security for costs" - a sum it said would cover less than one-third of its estimated $350,000 legal fees.

Comments

moncurcool says...

*Thus the Government is now, in effect, backing oil exploration in Bahamian waters even though the Prime Minister and several of his Cabinet ministers have said publicly that they are personally opposed to such activities.*

Is this statement factual. I think the Tribune should add clarification to this. If a previous government signed an agreement is a successive government bound by it? As is always said, governments are continuous. A newly elected government from one political party may disagree with what a previous government from another party may have done. However, legally they are bound to the agreement. They could cancel it, but then they need to be prepared to start paying out based on the lawsuits that may come.

Posted 24 December 2020, 8:26 a.m. Suggest removal

nassau98@aol.com says...

I support the Goverment. Drill, drill. I hope that a lot of oil is down there.

Posted 24 December 2020, 8:57 a.m. Suggest removal

ROMERBOY says...

Same keep drilling and discover what billions lie below. We need to wake up and think about how beneficial oil is to our everyday life. Think about transport and food. Our economy and people need this boost. I'm fed up having to depend on TOURISM! Keep drilling and don't leave Bahamian people empty-handed. Sam if anything yall were very slow to pull the trigger. P.S Reach out to Mr. BNT himself to do your work. He sure seems to be willing and ready to get his hands dirty.

Posted 24 December 2020, 9:15 a.m. Suggest removal

ColumbusPillow says...

Thank God for a government that has integrity!

Posted 24 December 2020, 11:45 a.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

ROTFL.. integrity we don't know what dat is

Posted 24 December 2020, 12:10 p.m. Suggest removal

Bahama7 says...

I’ve heard Fred Smith has launched a last ditch campaign to stop Santa delivering presents to the kids. It’s doomed to fail but he gets publicity and a big fee.

Seriously, let’s stop this nonsense and kick start our economy. The drill is our economic vaccine.. we need a shot in the arm.

Merry Christmas.

Posted 24 December 2020, 12:51 p.m. Suggest removal

DDK says...

BUNCH OF SICKOS!

Posted 24 December 2020, 1:02 p.m. Suggest removal

stislez says...

But doesn't drilling for oil and burning of fossil fuels are some of the major causes of global warming? Or we een tinkin bout dat we just tryna get dis corn? Just askin ya c

Posted 24 December 2020, 1:13 p.m. Suggest removal

ColumbusPillow says...

Global warming is a con.That the UN allowed a teenager with significant mental problems to address the UN about the future global warming catastrophe is outrageous
I have been here 35 years and have not noticed any "warming" or any noticeable sea level rise (look at in tidal gauges).

Posted 24 December 2020, 3:53 p.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

You mean Trump?

Posted 24 December 2020, 5:03 p.m. Suggest removal

stislez says...

Dey say the definition of insane is doing the same ting but expecting different results. What make yall tink even if they find oil that somehow that gone trickle down to your pockets. Lmfao

Posted 24 December 2020, 1:20 p.m. Suggest removal

Bahama7 says...

Ask the guys in Abu Dhabi... the money trickled down to their pockets BIG TIME.

Posted 24 December 2020, 2:22 p.m. Suggest removal

TimesUp says...

I've never seen more new profiles lol!

This whole fiasco is embarrassing, BPC is obviously a shockingly terrible company. They are so obvious and brazen in their use of false profiles to support their agenda and wildly exaggerated claims.

Personally I would be for drilling if one of the big companies came here with all their money, skill and knowledge to back them.

However this is a disaster, a sham and an embarrassment. Allowing a penny stock Ponzi scheme to blatantly hoodwink us...... look up the ship they use, look at the stock market history, look at those involved!

Absolutely shameful.

Posted 24 December 2020, 3:50 p.m. Suggest removal

ColumbusPillow says...

A lot of big oil production companies will rush in if BPC (an exploration company) is successful.

Posted 24 December 2020, 3:57 p.m. Suggest removal

Bahama7 says...

Yes, that’s the hope.

Posted 24 December 2020, 4:15 p.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

You two are hilarious. It's like Potter and his deputy signed up to comment on the Tribune site

Posted 24 December 2020, 5:04 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment