Wednesday, March 10, 2021
By RASHAD ROLLE
Tribune Senior Reporter
rrolle@tribunemedia.net
PROGRESSIVE Liberal Party Leader Philip “Brave” Davis said yesterday State Minister for Finance Kwasi Thompson “does not appear to understand the economics” surrounding consumption taxes as he defended the PLP’s plan to reduce value added tax to ten percent for one year if the party wins the next general election.
Mr Thompson accused the PLP of being irresponsible with its promise, saying the move would cost the government more than $100m at a time when the company’s fiscal state is already precarious.
Mr Davis, in response, said yesterday: “It is extraordinary that the government does not recognise the urgency of providing immediate relief to Bahamians. People are hurting. Our middle class is disappearing. That the FNM defends the status quo is evidence of how disconnected they are from the realities on the ground.
“The public finances are in a dire state. In order to offer immediate relief to hurting families and struggling businesses, but at the same time restore fiscal sanity, we also need to increase revenues to the public treasury and adopt new strategies to kick-start the economy.”
Mr Davis said it is revealing that Mr Thompson has focused on VAT but ignored the other proposals in the party’s economic plan, which were unveiled on Sunday.
He said: “Consumption taxes rely on consumer spending in order to generate tax revenue. When the government imposed the shock increase in VAT by 60 percent in 2018, consumers cut back on their spending. Since then, the government has failed to meet a single one of its revenue projections. This is what happens when you don’t understand basic economics. If you set consumption taxes too high, the economy slows down. These are the facts. This is the economic reality.
“Our proposal to cut VAT to ten percent represents a modest decrease which will bring some relief to thousands of Bahamian families and help inject cash into an economy that desperately needs it.
“Once again, this reduction in VAT was not offered as a stand-alone proposal. Bahamians will see that we also propose a significant number of revenue-enhancing measures. VAT is not the only tax-raising mechanism available to the government – but it is one that disproportionately affects ordinary Bahamians.
“The junior minister argues that this modest decrease in VAT will lead to a reduction in revenue for the government. He is wrong. In fact, there will be an overall increase in revenue. Again, back to basic economic principles: the lower the price, the higher the demand. Lowering prices drive an increase in economic activity. Further, against the advice of the IMF as well as government consultants, they have bastardised the VAT model left in place by the former administration.”
Noting that the stated $100m reduction amounts to a loss of $8m per month, Mr Davis questioned whether the Minnis administration “really (lacks) the ability to find an additional $8 million per month to alleviate the tax burden on ordinary Bahamians, at a time when so many are out of work through no fault of their own?”
“Bear in mind,” he said, “that this is a government that chose to spend almost $200 million on a run-down hotel in Grand Bahama.
“This is also the same government that at the height of the pandemic chose to spend $20 million on sidewalks.
“And the same government that refuses to report, as required by law, how they have spent hundreds of millions under the Emergency Orders.
“We have some sympathy with the minister for his failure to be able to recognise a good plan.
“This government specialises in political attacks, not credible plans. They move from crisis to crisis, with no vision and no confidence in the Bahamian people. Their inability to plan deliberately has increased the damage caused by Hurricane Dorian and the pandemic.
“We believe continuing on the present path would be catastrophic.”
Comments
moncurcool says...
Where was Davis' voice when the PLP introduced a 100% shock increase to the Bahamas when it introduced VAT? I didn't hear him out there fighting for relief for Bahamians. And now he wants to act so concerned? Please, stop with the deception.
Posted 10 March 2021, 3:21 p.m. Suggest removal
tribanon says...
You're obviously not aware that 100% of a zero VAT rate equals zero. LOL
Posted 10 March 2021, 4:17 p.m. Suggest removal
moncurcool says...
Evidently you went to the university of wulff road and learned vodoo mathematics.
Posted 10 March 2021, 6:40 p.m. Suggest removal
tribanon says...
Obviously you must have gotten a D - education in our dysfunctional public education system. Plug 100% of zero into any calculator and see what you get. 100% of nothing will always amount to nothing. Any multiple of zero will always equal zero in the real world of maths. LMAO
Posted 11 March 2021, 10:21 a.m. Suggest removal
hrysippus says...
Why not decrease vat by 8% instead of by 2%? My economic model shows that will increase gubmint revenues by 1.2 billion dollars. LOL.
Posted 10 March 2021, 4:27 p.m. Suggest removal
moncurcool says...
Better yet, decrease it by 100%. That way people would have way more money in their pocket.
Posted 10 March 2021, 6:41 p.m. Suggest removal
KapunkleUp says...
He really reminds me of a fat, ugly chicken head.
Posted 10 March 2021, 9:31 p.m. Suggest removal
bogart says...
Way past time for the Govt to go after the some 29% in Bahamas trade in fraudulent invoices and fraud of that sort that Financial Secretary Marlon Johnson had raised abbout a year ago and he somehow became silent on that.
Everyone have known for years and years of persons ducking or commiting fraud to avoid paying Customs duties or rightful taxes from persons with invoices at airport to trailers.
Then after holes in this evolved, is the Vat to augment revenue, then the next Vat to augment the previous Vat which was to augment collevtion of porous Customs duties holes.
SIMPLE SOLUTION instead of pussyfooting, beating around the bushes, is for a govt, is to start jailing those caught at the beginning at the porus tax collection and those merchants ridiculously inflated gouging priced items.
While the Davis ppermutations and combinations of any savings proposes likely to be spent wasted acquiring other part of hill if not already in Palmetto for Hospital and knocking down the hill just to leave a hole.
Posted 10 March 2021, 9:51 p.m. Suggest removal
Dawes says...
Because our Government doesn't think smart. They will look at a tax and say only 90% are complaint, and then instead of going after the 10% who aren't they will increase the rates and make doing business harder. After the new changes only 87% are compliant, but Government saw an increase in revenue so they are happy. This will keep happening until the revenue decrease and Government has no choice but to go after those non-compliant, but by then it will probably be too late.
Posted 11 March 2021, 9:06 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
I think it fair to assume that roughly 50% aren't compliant. How did I come up with 50%? Approximately 50% of the population are PLP and we know they never pay their fair share.
Posted 11 March 2021, 9:41 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment