LAW DOES NOT HAVE EMOTIONS!! And Wayne Munroe and his deputy prosecutor is getting beaten up on.

Munroe's reasoning makes no sense, despite his wordsmiting and sophistry. What is the purpose of the age of consent otherwise?

More than just one purpose and among them s to not have babies having babies. To ensure that those who engage in sex are prepared mentally and financially for parenthood. Also to avoid grown men or (women) from invading the homes of minors and creating havoc on n a family. Once a person reaches the age of consent and chooses to have sec, then they are fully responsible for all their actions and any consequences from it.

Repost:
One thing Wayne Munroe did, is expose how many **pedophiles** we have living in this little Bahamas (some possibly commenting online).
The persons who getting upset about raising the age, probably out there molesting someone's child as we speak. SMH. This country is truly sickening and sad indeed!

What a jackass, the sentence was not too harsh it was far too lenient, should have been 10 years. Clearly Munroe is unfit for office and should resign.

Is this truly one of our nation's leaders saying this? Since when is it acceptable to defend -- especially publicly -- sex between and adult and a minor?

According to Section 11 under the heading "Indictable Sexual Offences" of The Bahamas's Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence Act, 1991:

11. (1) Any person who — (a) has unlawful sexual intercourse with any person being of or above fourteen years of age and under sixteen years of age, whether with or without the consent of the person with whom he had unlawful sexual intercourse; or (b) attempts to have unlawful sexual intercourse with any person being of or above fourteen years of age and under sixteen years of age, whether with or without the consent of the person with whom he attempted to have unlawful sexual intercourse, is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for life.

My understanding of this: In The Bahamas statutory rape law is broken when an adult (18+ years of age) has sexual intercourse with any person older than 14 and younger than 16 with or without consent.

I'd be remiss if I didn't include this from the above Act:

10. (1) Any person who — (a) has unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under fourteen years of age, whether with or without the consent of the person with whom he had unlawful sexual intercourse; or (b) attempts to have unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under fourteen years of age, whether with or without the consent of the person with whom he had unlawful sexual intercourse, is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for life.

Section 10, not 1.

Because they are attempting to explain the naked and undressed facts of the law to people who are full of emotions and have caught feelings on the matter. Yes, it is grossly disgusting to think of a 40 year old man having sex and establishing a sexual relationship with a 14 year old girl but only the laws on the books can apply. Does it mean now that the laws have to be changed or upgraded? And any parent ( fathers at least) finding that a ‘big rusty man’ was sexually involved with his 14 year old daughter, would become blood thirsty. Wayne Munroe was try to explain the difference between forced rape and consensual rape and also the diff between an underage person who was already sexually active and one who was a virgin being the victim. These all have bearing on the penalty given for rape. And if the sentence for forced rape is seven years and the convict in this instance was given four years prison time, plus two years probation then that is within the sentenc norms. What the public is probably crying out for is the overall increase in the penalties for rape. And this must be measured under two parameters as opposed to modern day Bahamas, where the act now seems so perverted and has enraged many. Firstly under slavery, it was a common practice for slave owners or members to f his family to deflower young, virgin slaves, and many below the age of consent. Back then, this behavior was justified on several fronts: Firstly that the slave master owned the slave girl and had all rights and full access to her. Secondly it was considered an economic activity. The quicker a slave can become active and start to breed, the greater the financial gain for the owner. After all he had to feed and clothe her.

WTH?!? LOL!!

@john, man you really need to get over your slave and all women must submit mentality, your use of that strange term "consensual rape", whatever the hell that is, pretty much sums up your submit, man is the master mentality!
And, by the way, although slavery was abolished 189 years ago the practice of mature Bahamian males deflowering young and underaged virgins continues unabated as evidenced from the case above.

The post is in three parts because the Tribune has word limits. Maybe you need to read the entire text so as not to take it out of context. And y’all always saying Blacks need to get over slavery but have Jews gotten over the Holocaust? And what about the Indians? Orr!. And yes, there is a problem with older men preying on young girls in n this country. No doubt and if you read the last part of the post bid does reference it. In some parts of the country there was also a big problem with incest. Brother and sister and first cousins and fathers and daughters. Some even wanting to marry. And it was overlooked for decades because it was claimed that the pool from which they choose a lifelong partner was so limited. So they kept it all in the family.

Agreed, the slave card and race card are always pulled up.

Regarding " Does it mean now that the laws have to be changed or upgraded?" Did you read what the existing law says?

According to Wayne Munroe the going penalty for rape is 7 years and the maximum is ten. Unlawful sexual intercourse is distinguished from rape and is considered a lesser crime. People are still confusing it with statutory rape, which, apparently has been removed from the books. So Wayne Munroe’s contention is four years prison plus two years probation is rather harsh penalty for statutory rape after the accused has entered a plea agreement and in light that a person is getting seven years for rape even after having a full trial.

Then after the slave trade there was barely little for a person to do after reaching child bearing age except get married and start a family. Most family islands did not have high schools and even for economic reasons, parents would give consent for their daughters to get married at The age of 14-15-16 years old. And it was acceptable and considered ‘normal’. BUT TODAY! A fourteen year old is still considered a child by any stretch of the imagination. She is not considered physically or mentally mature enough to be engaging in sex and it is flesh crawling disgusting to be having sex with someone THREE TIMES her age. There is college and university and careers and career building and requirements for flexibility and mobility that will be severely hampered by an absent father child clinging to her skirt. Her whole life is ahead of her and she destroyed it not just by having sex but by becoming impregnated by an older dude. So it’s time to fix the law. Society frowns on this type of sexual activity and these types of relationships. Lock up the perpetrators and throw away the keys even. Will that be a deterrent or will there be more single parents with fathers behind bars

Listen folks need to take emotions out of it, everyone making noise but the parent, take this note, the child was not rapped but simply having sex under the legal age, in the case its obvious that she did not say she was raped not were any charges brought forth on rape.

Unless we impose the strictness of the law concerning such cases we will perpetuate the destruction of our young women’s futures. By such an example any adult male should be made aware that it will be his life and liberty which he risks, and risks completely. And unless we take measures to adequately educate our people of the consequences of sexually driven behaviors which impact the lives of others we shall overburden our already overburdened society with deeper social issues. The child concerned in this case was far too immature to fully comprehend the ramifications of her choices, therefore, due to her ignorance and immaturity, she WAS RAPED by an adult. An example should be made of the 40 yr old! Not excuses. By his comments Wayne Monroe has clearly shown he has no interest in protecting the young and vulnerable in our society from predatory adults and that he himself is too immature or ignorant to fully comprehend the deeper issue for the betterment of our society.

Ok, hold on for a sec, what if the 14 year old manipulated the 40 year old , despite the age difference. Wr are assuming the 14 yr old is ignorant. Now, don't get me wrong, It is wrong what happened, but , what if the 14 yr old went out seeking a sugar daddy intentionally ?

“Yes she can give consent. You can consent from seven years old"

What the hell. This from a government minister? Where is the PM ?.Why is this man still representing the Government ?

Obviously the minister was referring to the age of accountability. When a child comes to know right from wrong. But obviously laws ar needed to protect children and the vulnerable. Some who cannot comprehend the full consequences of their actions.

there are 2 to blame, the young lady did not give it away once, it was multiple times and went to the gentleman's house without being forced. Yes he is older and should have control and not partake but she is just as wrong as he is.

You certainly have no understanding of why we, in common with most civilized societies around the world, have enacted laws to protect vulnerable minors.

Mojo and John are both idiots

**EVERY CABINET MEMBER WHO DOES NOT PUBLICLY CRY OUT FOR MUNROE TO BE IMMEDIATELY DISMISSED BY DAVIS FROM CABINET MUST BE DEEMED TO SHARE MUNROE'S ABHORRENT BELIEF THAT A SEVEN YEAR OLD GIRL HAS THE MENTAL CAPACITY AND MATURITY TO CONSENT TO BEING SEXUALLY ASSAULTED/RAPED.**

**MUNROE HAS CONFESSED TO THE ENTIRE WORLD THAT HE IS INDEED A PROFOUNDLY DISGUSTING, LOATHESOME, AND REPUGNANT CHOWDERHEAD WHO IS COMPLETELY UNWORTHY OF SERVING THE BAHAMIAN PEOPLE IN ANY CAPACITY WHATSOEVER.**

**DAVIS, COOPER, WILCHCOMBE, MITCHELL, PINDER AND EACH OF THE OTHER CABINET MEMBERS CANNOT POSSIBLY JUSTIFY IN ANY WAY MUNROE CONTINUING TO REMAIN AMONG THEM WITHOUT BEING DEEMED TO BE SUPPORTIVE OF HIS MOST DISGRACEFUL AND ABHORRENT VIEWS.**

**WE, THE BAHAMIAN PEOPLE, ANXIOUSLY AWAIT THE PUBLIC OUTCRY WARRANTED FROM EACH AND EVERY CABINET MEMBER AND FOR MUNROE'S IMMEDIATE REMOVAL BY DAVIS FROM HIS CABINET POST. NOTHING LESS WOULD BE APPROPRIATE OR JUSTIFIABLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.**

Davis will rue the day he put Munroe in his cabinet. He still have a chance to do a course correction. Like you said if the other cabinet members does not speak out, I will consider them in agreement. Why hasn't the PM spoken up yet?

Hey idiot : Munroe was not the judge in the matter nor the prosecutor. He, with his knowledge of the law, was only explaining why the sentencing was what it was and also indicated what it could have been if the defense attorney had been more diligent. If the penalties need to be increased then so be it. There is a difference between unlawful sexual inter course and rape. Rape is considered a crime of violence.. That is why the laws were re-written to clearly reclassify statuary rape as unlawful sexual intercourse. So technically if a person rapes an underage girl, technically he can be charged with rape and unlawful sexual intercourse.

ZZZZZZzzzzzz......

This guy is a serious piece of work.

A 14 year old should be too busy with their education to be in a sexual relationship. Who is to decide if she was coerced, induced or intimidated into "consenting"?

REALLY!!!!!

Rape is wrong, but whom is to decide if she wasnt taking advantage of the 40 year old? She had sex several times, she went to his house passing several adults along the way. She may have been manipulating him for every dollar he had in the world..

Munroe still thinks he is a defense attorney...

**WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH DAVIS? CAT GOT HIS TONGUE? BY NOW HE SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE SOB MUNROE TO IMMEDIATELY SUBMIT HIS RESIGNATION FROM CABINET OR ELSE.**

**AND NOTE THAT WE STILL HAVE NO PUBLIC OUTCRY FROM ANY CABINET MEMBER. ARE THEY ALL SUPPORTIVE OF THE VIEWS AND BELIEFS OF THE MOST DISGUSTING, LOATHESOME AND REPUGNANT MUNROE? THERE ARE SOMETHINGS THE "COLLECTIVE DOCTRINE" WAS NEVER INTENDED TO APPLY TO AND THIS IS CERTAINLY ONE OF THEM.**

I am so disgusted by Davis and crew. Munroe has put his foot in his throat more than enough time to have been fired by now

It seems some do not understand. It does not matter if the girl paid the guy for sex, she is underage and therefore it is statutory rape. There is no part of the law that says "this does not apply if the girl consents". In fact it explicitly says consent or not, so that doesn't matter. There is no excuse for a 40 year old to be sleeping with a 14 year old. The book should be thrown at him.

And as a side note and still somewhat related to this matter but never to justify the actions of the 40 year old man. But do you know what one of the biggest problems young men face who are into the club scene? Talking about teenagers and guys in their early 20’s. They go in a club and meet a young female. They hit it off talking and dancing. She’s consuming alcohol and because she is in the club and consuming alcohol, the young man assumes she’s at least eighteen. And as the night progresses they leave the club and engages in sex. Then it is not until days or weeks or even months later the guy finds out the girl is not 18 but a 14 or 16 or even 16 year old. And sometimes when they try to break off the relationship, the girl can become very aggressive and threatening. The most common threat is ‘I ger tell them you raped me.’ And this can also be very devastating for the young man who may be away in college or on a successful career path. In Florida, authorities tried to make the club owners responsible and liable if they allowed underage patrons in a club without proper id or with fake id. So as Wayne Munroe and The DDP was trying to explain, the circumstances of the case determine what the panalties are after conviction.

You are damaged goods.

Think freely dude!

John, this is reasonable. They are so many facts that lead to a persons actions , and all have to be considered with emotions out.

Possibly too much of the wrong kind of cannabis.

This what happens when a Defense/ Criminal Lawyer becomes Minister of National Security.
His outlook will always be from a criminal defense point of view.

‘ Police found the girl at the man’s home after an anonymous tip in early 2020 and met her putting on her school uniform. The child was examined at the hospital and where it was discovered she was pregnant.’ The matter happened two years ago and the victim is now 16 and apparently the mother of a child that is at least one year old. So what is the relationship between the victim and the convict and the child and the convict? Has the convict been forbidden to have any contact with the victim and will he (the convict) be denied parental rights upon his release from prison? Has a paternity test been done to determine the true father of the child, based on inferred statements made about the victim and generalized statements about the sexual activity of young people?

Wayne Munroe short coming is the fact that he is not a politician. He bleeds the law. He is not going to tell you what you want to hear. He gonna tell you what the law says and what he believes. Our preference is someone who speaks with flowery words, innuendos and false truths.

I gave several interviews and I hope that pulling the salient points together in one place can be helpful to understanding my position:

#1 Anyone who has sexual intercourse with a child under 16 is disordered.

Excuse me sir, is your definition of "disordered" ILLEGAL? That's what the primary issue is here. Immoral, yes. Abusive, yes. But, for this discussion, the word is illegal.

And, yes, Mr. DPM, the age of consent must be raised to an unqualified, unambiguous 18 years old. No loopholes.

When Munroe spoke his most disgusting, loathsome, and repugnant words, not only did he not misspeak, but he was speaking in an official capacity as a member of cabinet with ministerial responsibility for national security.

How many times have we been reminded that under our parliamentary system of government, cabinet speaks and acts under the 'collective doctrine' with one voice as the policy making and legislative arm of our government?

If Munroe is allowed to remain in cabinet, then it can only mean that each and every cabinet minister from Davis right on down the ladder is supportive of the outrageous and unacceptable views he expressed in public as a cabinet minister. They will be deemed to be supportive of Munroe under their very own collective doctrine whereby they speak with one voice for government on all policy related matters.

Already the public has a number of grave concerns about the collective views and beliefs of cabinet, with Davis's recent appointment of the loathsome gambling thug Sebas Bastian to a 'diplomatic' post accompanied by a public reference to him as "His Excellency" being the latest case in point.

And Davis's wife speaking out against Munroe's disgracefully abhorrent opinion as a cabinet minister is not a legitimate substitute for each and every cabinet member doing the only right and proper thing in the circumstances, i.e., unanimously cry out for Munroe to immediately submit his letter of resignation. And if he fails to do so, then Davis should not be seen to be hiding under his wife's skirt as a means of dodging doing the only right thing...firing Munroe from his cabinet post.

Now more than ever, Davis needs to send a very clear and unequivocal message that no one in his cabinet may support in any way the sexually assault or abuse of minors in our country, especially young girls. Davis and the other cabinet ministers must not allow Munroe to keep his cabinet post and sit among them.

No leader of a parliamentary democracy in the free world today worth his salt would accept a cabinet minister uttering such abhorrent views and beliefs in private, let alone in public. Swift action must be taken because the people will not accept nor forget this one...ever!

You know, over the years you always heard about humans evolving fry m apes. And some went as far as to say black people were monkeys. Porch monkeys to be exact. Now new information is coming out that there was actual inbreeding with humans and apes that occurred over the centuries. It happened in the Caucus Mountains which was a mountain ridge behind Georgia in Russia. The end result of this inbreeding was the Caucasian who got their name fry m living in caves up in the Caucus Mountains. The inbreed species eventually came down and populated Asia and Europe and eventually made it to the United States. The point people always have ulterior motives, especially for not telling the truth. Google Yakub

You're a shining example of the harm habitual smoking of potent cannabis does to the human brain.