Davis govt also gave out no-bid contract

By RASHAD ROLLE

Tribune Senior Reporter

rrolle@tribunemedia.net

THE Ministry of Tourism under the Davis administration gave a no-bid contract to Colina Insurance Limited to provide insurance services under the Bahamas Travel Health Visa programme.

That ministry’s decision, which was made last Fall after the Davis administration came into office and flies in the face of its position when the PLP was in opposition came when it criticised the Minnis administration for similarly giving a no-bid contract to Kanoo Pays for payment processing services for the health visa.

Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper confirmed yesterday there was no tendering process for the insurance contract because of time constraints.

He said the previous provider, CG Atlantic, was not forthcoming with details about the performance of the programme and was not willing to extend its services until ministry officials could analyse the scheme.

Just last week, however, Auditor General Terrance Bastian’s report into the visa programme was released and it criticised the lack of competitive bidding associated with the programme since its inception. Mr Bastian’s report covered November 2020 to August 2021, before Colina was given the insurance contract.

 Mr Cooper, the Minister of Tourism, Aviation and Investments, told reporters before a Cabinet meeting yesterday: “The health insurance was granted to CG Atlantic originally. That did not go through a formal tendering process and there is a view that the Ministry of Tourism is a corporate sole and in effect because we negotiate large scale contracts abroad that has to be done swiftly and expeditiously, the Tourism Act, which many persons should familiarise themselves with, authorises the Ministry of Tourism to enter contacts outside of the normal frame of what you would find in the public service. So, let me be clear about that in the first instance.”

 He added: “There were inquiries in relation to the performance of the health insurance with CG Atlantic. The information was not forthcoming. We were approaching a deadline by which we needed to enter a new contract otherwise the contract would have expired with there being no insurance in place. Because we did not receive the information and the claims experienced and the utilisation of the plan in a timely manner, we were unable to determine whether the pricing was appropriate.

 “Subsequent to that we made inquiries of other insurance companies. Colina responded in a timely manner with a rate that was better than what we had with CG Atlantic and with a profit-sharing component. In other words, if the plan makes excessive amounts of money for the insurer, they will pay some back to the government so we thought it was a much better deal than the one we had. CG Atlantic refused to extend the policy to allow us to do the appropriate analysis and we took the decision to move to another carrier.”

 Asked what was different about the no-bid contract to Colina and the no-bid contract to Kanoo, Mr Cooper declined to compare the two.

 “I will speak to the decision making of my administration and me as a minister and defend my stewardship,” he said. “I am not going to get into the politics of Kanoo and the Bahamas Travel Health Visa.”

 In his audit report, Mr Bastian acknowledged the time pressures officials faced in originally executing the visa programme, but said the Ministry of Tourism should still have gone out to tender, particularly for the insurance contract because of the significant costs associated with that service.

 “The Ministry of Tourism failed to comply with the regulatory requirements for the procurement of goods and services,” Mr Bastian wrote. “Seeking competitive bids is a mechanism intended to provide some assurance to the reasonableness of costs of goods and services. Considering the cost of the travel insurance to CG Atlantic of $16,782,895, representing 48.7 percent of total revenue, it would have been prudent to test the marketplace by seeking at least one other quote despite the pressing time limitations.”

Comments

moncurcool says...

> Asked what was different about the
> no-bid contract to Colina and the
> no-bid contract to Kanoo, Mr Cooper
> declined to compare the two.
>
> “I will speak to the decision making of my administration and me as a
> minister and defend my stewardship,”
> he said. “I am not going to get into
> the politics of Kanoo and the Bahamas
> Travel Health Visa.”

Total hypocrisy on the part of Cooper and the PLP. The FNM does it they say something nefarious going on. They do it he tells people the Act allows it. This new day worst than gangsters

Posted 23 February 2022, 9:46 a.m. Suggest removal

tribanon says...

> Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper confirmed yesterday there was no tendering process for the insurance contract because of time constraints.

>He said the previous provider, CG Atlantic, was not forthcoming with details about the performance of the programme and was not willing to extend its services until ministry officials could analyse the scheme.

This pretty much sums up the matter. CG Atlantic obviously refused to engage in any shenighans, and corrupt Cooper, finding CG Atlantic to be too upright and proper in the conduct of their business affairs for his liking, decided to park the government's travel visa insurance business on a no-bid basis with a much less upright and 'much more accommodative' insurer willing to wheel and deal, namely Colina. Birds of a feather do indeed like to flock together. LOL

Posted 23 February 2022, 11:33 a.m. Suggest removal

TalRussell says...

Here we've come, full circle with another **lacking enforcement power** Auditor General's report, highlighting yet another **lame justification** behind the **suddenness** of de granting of a **'No Bid' contract,** only enforces, **why a big chunk eligible First-Time Electors,** decided to stay away from polling stations on 2021 general election day, **disbelieving any promise** that **change meant more** than just addressing a change of de politicians' T-shirts color, ― Yes?

Posted 23 February 2022, 11:52 a.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

The FNM part is above reproach. blameless transparent perfect without fault according to them

The PLP on the other hand has sinned.

Posted 23 February 2022, 1:25 p.m. Suggest removal

moncurcool says...

Grow up birdie. Put your country above blind partisan politics.

The PLP rant and raged about the FNM being wrong doing it and when the shoe came on the other foot, the PLP did the exact same thing. Pure hypocrisy .

But clearly it is done to appease people who cannot think for themselves and just follow blindly.

Posted 23 February 2022, 3:13 p.m. Suggest removal

SP says...

With 50 years of experience to draw from, anyone stupid enough to expect anything different from the PLP and FNM needs to skip having their heads examined and just take a swan dive off the highest point of Paradise Island west bridge!

Posted 23 February 2022, 7:13 p.m. Suggest removal

bahamianson says...

this is just terrible, why vote anymore? what is the point? These guys , meaning all political candidates, enrich themselves , family and lovers. I need a political appointment.

Posted 24 February 2022, 8:22 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment