Records could be expunged for emergency order breaches

By LEANDRA ROLLE

Tribune Staff Reporter

lrolle@tribunemedia.net

AN amendment to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act will allow for people convicted of certain criminal offences - including Emergency Order violations - to make “immediate application” to have their records expunged.

National Security Minister Wayne Munroe, who led debate on the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Amendment) Bill 2022 yesterday, said the legislation is demonstration of the Davis administration’s commitment to fulfilling its promises to the Bahamian people.

“This particular bill fulfils a commitment made to the Bahamian people in the blueprint for change,” Mr Munroe said during his contribution in the House of Assembly. “In page 14... we committed to expunge records of minor offences in violation of emergency orders.”

“In my view, these sections would do well to be considered because we say, and I quote ‘we will rescue the most vulnerable and discouraged in our society’.

“I refer to that because the sad history of the emergency orders saw the brutalisation of some of the most vulnerable in our society as was chronicled in page after page in the national press reporting of convictions of persons for breaches of the orders made under the emergency powers regime.”

Continuing his criticism of the Emergency Powers Orders, Mr Munroe lamented that some people have lost opportunities and suffered traumatic experiences because of the COVID related convictions.

However, with the new bill, the Freetown MP said the government will be able to “right the wrongs” of the past.

“It cannot be right that one could accept as an explanation from the then health minister that a plane is permitted to land because it has vital medical supplies and nothing adverse (happens). We do not see the matter before the court. We do not hear a conviction, but the young men who have a need to go to the water park for water don’t have the benefit of that as an explanation good enough to explain why they can come out of their yards,” he said.

“It is just amazing that the impact of these laws seems to impact disproportionately on the poor, on the homeless, on the disadvantaged and seem to skip right over the rich, the privileged and in one instance, a sitting Cabinet minister happened to admit breach of the law, I didn’t notice him being put before the court and being made subject to a conviction.

“We have the phenomenon, which is a national disgrace of Charles Johnson, a man in his 60s who was confined to his house without electricity and without running water who, after weeks, decided he needed some fresh air, stepped outside of his house and was hauled before the courts and has a conviction at 60 for a criminal offence.”

After the emergency orders were put in place, scores of people were prosecuted for various offences, including violating curfew.

The situation forced many to apply to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Committee to have their records expunged.

However, the process was not automatic and often took some time.

Yesterday, Mr Munroe said the amendment will allow for people convicted of certain offences, including COVID-19 violations, to make “immediate application” to his ministry for expungement.

“What we, therefore, have is the ability for any person to apply to the minister now, the other regime permitted for application to the rehabilitation of offender’s committee whose decision was then ratified or otherwise by the minister,” the Freetown MP continued. “This is a shorter process with immediate application to the minister for expungement of certain offences. The time period is shortened from two years under the advocate of the rehabilitation of offenders committee to six months.”

“And so just as the amendment to the Evidence Act provides, this amendment will almost automatically permit people who have been pestering the Ministry of National Security as to when we will address these offences to make immediate application for expungement.”

The Rehabilitation of Offenders (Amendment) Bill, 2022 includes a new section 15, which notes the minister’s discretion to declare certain people rehabilitated.

The bill says the “minister may by order, subject to affirmative resolution of both Houses of Parliament, declare any or all persons convicted of any class of criminal offence specified in the order to be treated as a rehabilitated person in respect of that offence; have his conviction in respect of that offence treated as spent, and have his record for the conviction of the offence expunged, whether or not the rehabilitation period specified for that offence under Section 4(2) has been met.”

However, the amendment does not apply to people who have committed murder, manslaughter, treason, armed robbery, rape or possessed dangerous drugs with the intent to supply.

Central Grand Bahama MP Iram Lewis said while he supports expunging records for people convicted of minor offences, the bill needs to provide more clarity regarding which offences can be expunged by the minister among other things.

He was also of the view that the Bill left too much to the discretion of the minister.

“The Bill does not speak to the type of offences that the minister has discretion to expunge. There should be a specific schedule and there is already one included in the act,” he told parliamentarians.

“Why is it that this government wants to move away from what we already have that works. In principle I am for expunging the minor offences, but this bill must be more specific in terms of what offence the minister has purview over.

“Further, I believe the power should stay with the committee and not the minister and parliament. That’s my view.”

Comments

tribanon says...

> The Rehabilitation of Offenders (Amendment) Bill, 2022 includes a new section 15, which notes the minister’s discretion to declare certain people rehabilitated.

>The bill says the “minister may by order, subject to affirmative resolution of both Houses of Parliament, declare any or all persons convicted of any class of criminal offence specified in the order to be treated as a rehabilitated person in respect of that offence; have his conviction in respect of that offence treated as spent, and have his record for the conviction of the offence expunged, whether or not the rehabilitation period specified for that offence under Section 4(2) has been met.”

TOTAL UNCONSTITUTIONAL, PERIOD. Clearly brain-dead Munroe, a lawyer no less, is ignorant of both our nation's Constitution and Westminster parliamentary system of government.

Under the doctrine of separation of powers, the governance of a state is traditionally divided into three branches each with separate and independent powers and responsibilities: an executive, a legislature and a judiciary. The distribution of power in this way is intended to prevent any one branch or person from being supreme and to introduce ‘checks and balances’ through which one branch may limit another. According to a strict interpretation of the separation of powers, none of the three branches may exercise the power of the other, nor should any person be a member of more than one of the branches.

The judiciary exercises scrutiny over the executive by ensuring that the executive acts within its powers. This involves ensuring that the executive only acts where it has the power to do so, and that it exercises its powers in accordance with the law. This judicial scrutiny extends to checking that any legislative acts carried out by the executive (that is, the making of subordinate legislation) are within the scope of the powers delegated by parliament. The courts can therefore question the lawfulness of actions by public bodies, including government ministers, and this is done through a procedure known as judicial review. This role of the judiciary highlights why it is so important for judges to be independent of the influence of the executive.

Brain-dead Munroe and the other idiots pushing this bill as currently worded are putting on full display their D - education.

Posted 14 July 2022, 3:50 p.m. Suggest removal

LastManStanding says...

The real question here is why would anyone of sound mind deny a person a job because of a charge relating to the unconstitutional emergency orders? Definitely should not be a deal breaker considering the insanity of the Minnis administration at that time.

Posted 14 July 2022, 4:17 p.m. Suggest removal

tribanon says...

Unfortunately the bill was not drafted to simply right the wrong committed against those who were literally persecuted by the unconstitutional orders and protocols. The scope of bill is very deliberatedly and deviously designed to be applied by the cabinet minister (at the behest of the PM) to anyone he (or she) alone would see fit to apply it to with the controlling political party in the HOA acting as a rubber stamp.

Posted 14 July 2022, 5:18 p.m. Suggest removal

tribanon says...

In other words, so much for everyone being treated equally under the 'blind eyes of the law'.

It seems Cruel Davis now wants to be an even more evil authoritarian tyrant than Minnis was. Truly frightful to say the least.

Posted 15 July 2022, 11:42 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment