Thursday, June 30, 2022
By LEANDRA ROLLE
Tribune Staff Reporter
lrolle@tribunemedia.net
FREE National Movement chairman Dr Duane Sands yesterday staunchly defended his role in the party’s leadership, calling accusations that he interfered in the internal affairs of former Prime Minister Dr Hubert Minnis’ constituency as nothing but an “unnecessary distraction.”
Dr Sands was contacted after he was accused by Dr Minnis of acting “unconstitutionally” over exercising his power as the party’s chairman.
Dr Minnis raised concerns about the issue in a letter dated June 27, 2022, which was leaked to the media.
In the letter, the Killarney MP said Dr Sands had interfered twice to cause delays to two scheduled association elections in his constituency “without just cause or even any reasonable explanation”.
Dr Minnis also alleged that “it is unheard of for the party, through the chairman, to directly interfere in the internal administration of a constituency association” since he, the elected MP, is in good standing with the party.
“I, as the MP for Killarney and the first named Member of Killarney Constituency association pursuant to Article 17 of the Constitution, regard this series of arbitrary acts of interference, and the proposed incursion into the constituency that I represent in Parliament, as hostile and needlessly divisive acts, which also happen to be unconstitutional,” according to the letter.
“I suggest that you kindly govern yourself accordingly, and permit the responsible deputy chairman and secretary general to perform their constitutional duties, without further unwarranted and unconstitutional interference by you.”
When contacted by The Tribune Dr Sands said it was his first time reading the letter, which he called unfortunate and an unnecessary distraction.
“The first time I saw the letter or any of its contents was on the post to Eyewitness News so I think we can assume that it was leaked by the person who penned the letter,” he said.
He also dismissed the claims that his actions were untoward, insisting he was only doing his job as outlined in the amended FNM constitution.
“It’s important for us to understand the roles of persons in any organisation,” Dr Sands said. “The role of the chairman of the Free National Movement is very clearly articulated in the recently revised constitution and I can assure you that I function with that as my guide.
“And that means as chairman, I am ultimately responsible for every election in the Free National Movement and it’s something that I take very seriously. Anyone who either seeks to represent the FNM or represents the FNM is a franchisee, okay.
“They are the standard bearers that have been ratified to be the standard bearer for the Free National Movement and as such, the party plays a pivotal role in every single association and organisation throughout the country.”
“That’s how it should have always been.”
Asked to respond to concerns that Dr Minnis’ letter showed there was disunity in the party, Dr Sands replied: “This is a very unfortunate distraction from the things that Bahamians find important and that FNM’s find important. The leadership of the Free National Movement is on a process of rebuilding the organisation and restoring public confidence and trust and the concept of a team is one that we take very very seriously, and I’ll just leave it at that.”
He added: “The country is currently challenged with ineffective and somewhat rudderless leadership right now and I think Bahamians already have a level of bias remorse so this distraction is both untimely and unfortunate and I can assure those persons who expect much from the FNM that we acknowledge this a little more than an unnecessary distraction.”
Dr Minnis yesterday denied that he leaked the letter to the media.
In last September’s election, the FNM suffered a crushing defeat, winning only seven seats, its worst performance since 1977 when it won only two seats.
Since the election, the party – under the leadership of Marco City MP Michael Pintard - has sought to become more unified and reconnect with their base who they believe felt abandoned by the previous Minnis administration.
Comments
sheeprunner12 says...
Duane Sands may not be the best person (at this time) to sit in the Chair.
Minnis & Pintard are not on the same page & it is doubtful that Sands can pull the factions together.
And Sands was very quiet about the Gibson affair.
So, there are a lot of issues to iron out at Council tonight.
Posted 30 June 2022, 10:26 a.m. Suggest removal
birdiestrachan says...
It is good as far as I am concerned that they are fighting e
Each
other they will destroy themselves all snakes in human form
Posted 30 June 2022, 12:05 p.m. Suggest removal
TalRussell says...
Comrade SheepRunner12, you thinks tone set tonight's UBP Council must have Sir Stafford and "Pop" Symonette a tossin' and a turnin' in they's graves. 'Tis little wonder why The UBP Council, seems to never get around to expelling your Comrade MP. ― Yes?
Posted 30 June 2022, 12:08 p.m. Suggest removal
JokeyJack says...
A recently amended Party constitution? LOL. Where online can this fine document be found?
My bet is on nowhere.
Posted 30 June 2022, 12:42 p.m. Suggest removal
JokeyJack says...
Still waiting on election results to be released by polling division. Wonder why those numbers are still a secret?
Posted 30 June 2022, 12:44 p.m. Suggest removal
sheeprunner12 says...
Who is responsible for that? FNM or PLP?
Posted 30 June 2022, 1:53 p.m. Suggest removal
LastManStanding says...
To be honest, having a permanent voter register is very concerning for me. I have a sad feeling that the graveyard constituency is going to become influential in upcoming elections.
Posted 30 June 2022, 5:55 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
Moneygrabbers birds of a feather.
Posted 30 June 2022, 2:43 p.m. Suggest removal
LastManStanding says...
I honestly thought that Sands would have been an excellent Prime Minister until I saw his stance on lockdowns.
Unfortunately the FNM doesn't want to face the hard fact that it was their COVID response that ended up costing them several marginal seats. Not enough to let them win, but enough to stop it from being so embarrassing. Choosing between the corruption of the PLP and the economic destruction of the FNM, it really was clear which one was the lesser evil.
Posted 30 June 2022, 5:42 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment