Wednesday, October 26, 2022
OLDER Bahamian men are less inclined than younger people to believe in the existence of marital rape - and also less likely to believe that it should be outlawed.
Despite this, according to a study in the International Journal of Bahamian Studies which saw 2,845 people interviewed in the Spring of this year, overall there was support — over 50 percent — for outlawing spousal rape.
Other findings from the study show that 15 percent of ever married women were raped; 14 percent had consented to unwanted sexual intercourse with their partners, and those who consented to unwanted intercourse were 11.1 percent more likely to have also been raped when compared to those who had not consented to unwanted sex.
“A Preliminary Study on Unwanted Sexual Intercourse within Long-term Relationships in The Bahamas” was presented at the University of The Bahamas yesterday and gave further insight into how spousal sexual abuse is perceived among certain demographics.
The Tribune had previously reported early findings from this report which found that one in 12, or an estimated 4,000 married women, have been raped by their husbands.
The study suggested that around 6,000 wives claimed being victims of sexual abuse. This would be any sexual activity that occurs without consent and refers to a sexual assault or sexual violence, including unwanted sexual touching, forced oral sex, and rape, among other sexual acts.
Yesterday, William Fielding, adjunct faculty member of University of The Bahamas, said the study looked particularly at relationships that lasted for one year or more.
“Relationships aren’t static. You have relationships that look like marriage even though they haven’t actually signed on the dotted line and what we’re trying to do in this piece of research is avoid the casual relationships and any possibility of date rape,” he said.
He also said: “The group of people who are the least likely to agree that marital rape can occur and least likely to feel that marital rape should be outlawed is this male group aged 55 and over and the importance of this group, of course, is its going to encapsulate the group of males, that group who have the power to change the law, I won’t say anything more about that and, of course, when we look outside of the state administration the other people that are vocal on this issue on the religious side they tend to males of the older age group.
“So when we are hearing these voices that are casting doubt upon marital rape in fact these are the voices that are very much typical from what we would find from the data.
“What is interesting is that in the other age groups, male and female, there is far more support for outlawing marital rape. So, overall the data does support that there is a clear support to outlaw marital rape and a clear acknowledgement that rape can occur within marriage however you want to call it, which suggests that even if the law is not changed immediately as those younger people age and they’re replaced by other people who will be wanting to think in a similar way that change is going to occur later rather than sooner.”
Closer analysis of the findings show that 63.5 percent of men in the 18 to 24 age group and 72.1 percent of women agreed that a husband can rape his wife.
However in the 55 and over age group, this fell to 45.1 percent, while 61.2 percent of women in the same age group believe this.
While most females — 69 percent — had not been hit by their long-term partner, were not fearful of their partner and had not had sex with their partner against their will, four percent of females had suffered from all of these concerning issues.
“While these percentages may not seem large, they potentially indicate that based upon the 2010 census, around 7,300 of women may fall into this group. Further, this figure represents a relatively large percentage of those who suffer just one of these issues, except the hit by partner group, and demonstrates the co-occurrence of these matters in the lives of women who have experienced long-term relationships,” the report noted. “We can also note that when women are subject to physical violence, they have almost a 50 percent chance of being subject to other behaviours of concern.”
The report said the results from this study are in broad agreement with the estimates for marital rape reported from the USA.
“We should note that this study gives estimates of the lifetime experience of rape within long-term relationships; it does not attempt to estimate the occurrence of rape of women only within marriage. However, our estimate of between about 15-30 percent of women being victims of rape in their long-term relationships demonstrates that women need protection from harm even within stable relationships.”
Comments
carltonr61 says...
This study seems very lateral as it relies too much on skewed questioning and answers from a too narrow group of frightened women as opposed to longitudinally across a wider spectrum of society. The excuse to discount men in their fifties implies that these wives are afraid of husband rapists but never asks the older wives if they acknowledge that rape is an event in marriage. The question should have been asked whether couples are duty bound to each other's sex as before marriage. Why of the millions of equalling important parts love and compromises and strengths within marriage sex is singled out. Why is there not a recommendation that if wives suddenly deprive their husbands of affection, it be deemed abnormal and toxic to marriage as rape? Cruelty by wives against husbands abandonment indifference is equally an act of mental and emotional violence. Sex is an integral part of Gid's plan to be fruitful and multiply using pleasure for both parties as a reward. If a wife demands their diabetic husband to fulfill her sexual needs help is an option. But to declare straight rape due to stoppage of sex for those males in their thirties begs fir adultery illnesses and broken homes. Do wives have any responsibilities to invite love and in doing so strengthen and secure her home? The dynamics of marriage sex is far more dimensional than than the narrowness implied by motivated individuals leaving wives and those to be of all ages without an opinion.
Posted 26 October 2022, 1:40 p.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
Why do so many people think that if this law is changed then woman will deny their husband sex? Very odd thinking to me.
Is it women acknowledging that in general they don't enjoy sex with their spouse so they will simply deny it?
Is it men thinking/knowing that their wives don't get any enjoyment out of their sex life and they fear the women frequently saying no?
I'm a 50 year old man and want this law changed so that men can't sexually abuse and/or rape their wives.
Posted 26 October 2022, 2:22 p.m. Suggest removal
M0J0 says...
simple do not get married then. Marriage is a partnership, many times I am sure the husband doesn't want to go shopping and hold a purse, but he does rite. Marital rape is one sided and can only be the works of bitter or sissy folks.
Posted 26 October 2022, 3:26 p.m. Suggest removal
carltonr61 says...
I have read the rape laws of individual USA States. Though Federally marital rape is a crime, Police mist often touch cases only when signs of obvious bruises are present, then only a hospital could declare penetration along with seven he say she say how it got there.
Posted 26 October 2022, 3:54 p.m. Suggest removal
carltonr61 says...
Older men, if something miraculously turns from flaccid to rigid, then, no time to ask questions before glory that comes in seconds. In EU the written permission was tested. A consenting yes meant it is ok for both parties. But while at the gate a sudden NO was written during the throughs to glory land with full brakes on but still sliding down the road then crashed and mash up. If I recall that was rape. So government needs to produce a marriage manual for sleeping like Adam and Eve while fearing Fox Hill all penetrating jungle.
Posted 26 October 2022, 4:41 p.m. Suggest removal
Commenting has been disabled for this item.