DPP: Trust us on plea deals

By LEANDRA ROLLE

Tribune Chief Reporter

lrolle@tribunemedia.net 

ACTING Director of Public Prosecutions Cordell Frazier urged the public to trust her office as it facilitates plea deals that ease the burden on the judicial system and victims.

Her comments explaining what her office considers when making deals came after some reacted with outrage because a man convicted of raping an elderly woman received a nine-year sentence as part of a plea deal last week.

A total of 25 plea agreements have been recorded for the year to date, according to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions' report covering the period from January to September 2024. 

The breakdown of offenses includes 16 pleas for armed robbery, the highest among the categories, followed by two pleas each for murder and unlawful sexual intercourse. Other offenses with recorded pleas include one each for attempted murder, rape, possession of a firearm, and "other offences".

She said: “First, we have to look at the nature of the offence and conduct an assessment of the sentence guidelines within our jurisdiction for that offence,” she said. “We then have to consider whether the defendant has any antecedents (actual convictions) of a similar or the same offence. However, charges are not convictions –– the presumption of innocence applies to that.”

“Then, consideration must be given to the early plea, which entitles the defendant’s sentence by law to be reduced by one-third. The complainant, or in the case of a murder, the next of kin is contacted by the attorney with carriage of the matter, and they are advised of the proposed agreement, and their views are obtained. In some instances, they request an impact statement or to be present on the hearing date.”

Some called for stiffer penalties for crimes against the elderly after last week’s plea deal. Ms Fraizer said that, generally, the law already provides for strict penalties, so amendments are not necessary. She also noted courts have the authority to determine if a plea agreement is viable before affirming the deal.

“What has to be considered is both the mitigating and aggravating factors coupled with what sentences have been passed by our courts for similar offences,” she said.

She said plea agreements are a powerful tool that not only help reduce case backlogs but also spare victims from reliving traumatic experiences while giving repentant defendants the chance to take full responsibility for their actions.

“It’s a balancing act,” she said. “We merely ask the public to trust the process and know that the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution is well equipped to carry out its mandate and to uphold the rule of law.”

In the last decade, the office has placed greater focus on plea deals, which are agreements between a prosecutor and a defendant where the accused agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in return for a concession.

There were 41 plea deals in 2016; 96 in 2017; 72 in 2018; 62 in 2019 and 13 in 2020. In 2023, there were 44 plea agreements: 24 for armed robbery, three for murder, two for attempted murder, three for unlawful sexual intercourse, one for manslaughter, one for rape, and ten for "other offences".

Comments

Sickened says...

Bunch of crap. Just today a man got a plea deal of 15 years for incest with his own daughter. This daughter gonna be reliving this for the rest of her life. Surely the father should have to stay in jail for the rest of his life as well, no??
How can you do something like this and then walk free in 15 years while your child is still suffering? How can a lawyer or judge or a normal human being think that 15 years is enough punishment? This man can get out, make more children and do the same thing again.

HANG THE BASTARD!!!!

Posted 2 October 2024, 11:50 a.m. Suggest removal

empathy says...

Ms. Frazier,

You have the support of many of your fellow citizens. All we ask are that you and your colleagues decisions, as well as the presiding justices be fair to both the victims (their families) and the accused. Especially ensuring that those accused don’t become victims themselves of corrupt practices of our law enforcement officers as happens in many countries, especially to our neighbors to the north as eloquently described in last month’s NYT.

Many of us think that punishment and retribution through our courts and prisons is the best way to deal with crime. However we know and EVIDENCE supports that the best way is to support incentives in our society to prevent them. This begins with strong educational and parental support as well as economic opportunities through employment and entrepreneurship. That’s were our limited monies should be directed.

Posted 2 October 2024, 12:52 p.m. Suggest removal

TalRussell says...

Sure, **let's more overcrowd** an already disgusting and overcrowded Fox Hill Prison by housing longer jail terms. -- Were maximum security cells -- Measuring **4 by 3 feet** -- Holds **(4)** humans. -- Sharing but a single **Shit and Piss Pail.** -- Hello!

Posted 2 October 2024, 2:54 p.m. Suggest removal

Sickened says...

Wait a second now. Some of you want less jail time for violent criminals just because our jail is full of criminals or because we need to show empathy? WHAT!!!! How can you justify letting nasty, abusive, murdering rapists go free and roam around our streets for those reasons?? Just how??

Christianity and an overall lack of grey matter is truly the downfall of our once great nation. So many of you must have family members who are criminals and you can't see empathize with what a truly innocent person/family feels. Shocking!!!

Posted 2 October 2024, 3:22 p.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

The punishment is the removal of freedom of movement that's it. Have someone lock you down at work for 24hours telling you what to do when to eat and when to sleep and you'll realize that it is actually punishment. To be under it for months and years is almost torture. But it's what people are burdened with for crimes and heinous crimes, no freedom of movement.

The inhumane stuff, the slop buckets, overcrowding, lice, rats, insects, rapes... it's simply not acceptable.it has nothing to do with punishment for a crime, it's simply inhumane.

All of that is separate and apart from the seeming injustice of a man who raped an 83 year old women receiving 9years in prison. Three separate issues

Posted 3 October 2024, 6:32 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment