Monday, September 23, 2024
By LEANDRA ROLLE
Tribune Staff Reporter
lrolle@tribunemedia.net
FREE National Movement (FNM) chairman Dr Duane Sands has warned the Davis administration against making a “historic blunder” by building a new hospital on an “environmentally sensitive site”, saying the decision will have serious long-term environmental consequences.
In a statement yesterday, Dr Sands again urged the government to reconsider the plan and instead prioritise rebuilding and improving the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH).
“The new health care facility proposed by the government on New Providence fails two tests: one related to health care and the other related to environmental protection,” Dr Sands said.
“Because we have limited green space in New Providence, we should protect such spaces. The government is foolishly intent on building a large facility on an environmentally sensitive site that also has various levels of contamination.”
“We can protect this green space and improve health care. We do not need to make a false choice. Both can be done. Indeed, preserving the green space would be good for public health.”
Dr Sands also noted the prime minister’s frequent international trips, where he often advocates for climate action.
He accused him of hypocrisy, saying the government’s healthcare plans directly contradict his stance on environmental protection.
“Once again, his words do match his big talk and rhetoric. His hypocrisy is stunning and disturbing,” the FNM chairman added.
He called on the prime minister to uphold his moral responsibility to future generations.
“If he proceeds with this environmentally disastrous policy, he will have shown that his previous statements on the environment and sustainability were mostly public relations, empty promises and rhetoric, and profiling on the world stage,” he said.
“It is not too late to rethink this policy, which is bad in terms of health care and the environment. The government should apply financial resources to rebuilding PMH instead of making what will undoubtedly be one the prime minister’s biggest blunders in office.”
The Davis administration has championed the new hospital as a critical infrastructure project aimed at enhancing healthcare services in the country.
Set to be constructed on a 51-acre site at the Perpall Tract Wellfield, the hospital will feature a 200-bed facility offering specialised services such as a neonatal unit, imaging, pathology, and telemedicine.
Health and Wellness Minister Dr Michael Darville has repeatedly defended the project, insisting the hospital site is suitable and will serve the Bahamian people well.
“I assure the Bahamian people that the site that we have chosen is an excellent site for this facility. It’s on high ground and to make it even more important, swamp and flooding mitigation will be a part of this entire development,” Dr Darville said on Friday.
Comments
birdiestrachan says...
doc Sands does not want a new hospital, I will trust Dr Darville over him all the time Doctor Darville has the heart of a God fearing physician he displayed it in his practices as a Doctor , and Doctor Darville cares about the Bahamian people he would do nothing to hurt the Bahamas or the people of the Bahamas , doc Sands have you called Ms Charles of the Miami Herald lately,?.
Posted 23 September 2024, 1:38 p.m. Suggest removal
realitycheck242 says...
Doc sands is right ......just read Mr: Miller Terry letter in the letters section......i urge Mr: Miller, take to the airwaves, get the environmental people involved. Go online with a petition against the destruction of this vital ecosystem. Your vision of Earth village must not die. The Perpall track area could be for the Nassau what many areas of Jamaica has become. An ecological green peace full area for the many thousands of tourists who looking for new experiences in Nassau, with nature trails for bird watching and a mini zoo featuring many Bahamian native wildlife including snakes and flamingoes. Continue your fight to save this area. Lets hope the PLP destruction plans do not take place in the next two years, for this is one reason they should be kicked out.
Posted 24 September 2024, 8:20 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment