Still no answer over who filed disclosures

By EARYEL BOWLEG

Tribune Staff Reporter

ebowleg@tribunemedia.net

NEARLY a month after the March 1 deadline passed, there is still no new timeline for public officials to file their mandatory financial disclosures — and the Public Disclosures Commission has yet to say how many officials have complied.

Bishop Victor Cooper, chairman of the commission, told The Tribune yesterday that while officials have continued submitting disclosures, he could not provide an exact number. He noted that some public officers have requested extensions.

Last month, he blamed delays on inaccessibility of the commission’s office and facility issues, including mould, which he said had affected processing. He confirmed yesterday that the commission is now temporarily operating from the Cabinet Office.

Under the law, senators, members of parliament, and senior public officials are required to declare their assets, income, and liabilities each year. Non-compliance can carry penalties of up to $10,000 or a two-year prison sentence. Despite this, officials have not publicly named those who missed this year’s deadline.

Opposition Leader Michael Pintard criticised the commission’s handling of the disclosures yesterday, saying the chairman is duty-bound to explain the basis for what he called “ongoing non-compliance”.

He questioned why such lengthy extensions are being granted and whether they are being given to the same individuals repeatedly. Mr Pintard also suggested the government may have philosophical objections to the law itself, citing informal reports to that effect.

Last year, Bishop Cooper revealed that 90 percent of parliamentarians met the March 1 disclosure deadline, though several senators and senior public officials had not. Officials have never disclosed who failed to comply.

Comments

Sickened says...

Of course there is no information. Criminals don't share that sort of information.
The law should be written whereby the officers of the PDC are automatically fined for not sharing the information that they receive by a certain date.
Morally corrupt people protecting morally corrupt people.

Posted 8 April 2025, 10:38 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

They have no intention of enforcing this. There is no more pretense that there is no corruption. they no longer care. And in the hope we may get a cut enough of us don't care either.

Posted 8 April 2025, 11:15 a.m. Suggest removal

JokeyJack says...

If i rob a bank and return 90% of the money will that be OK??? Of course not. The issue here is that peasants are not entitled to this information and every 5 years Bahamians vote to have their peasant status extended (like a water plant agreement) for another 5 years.

Posted 8 April 2025, 12:23 p.m. Suggest removal

bogart says...

Voters need to know ----- which of the elected voting citizens elected their MP's who followed the law with its clear deadline ----- and which of the elected MP's did not disclose by the deadline.

Totally unfair to deny the voting citizens and citizens in a sovereign nation touted as democracy to have one peson withheld this vital information from the citizens.

This allowed hindrance obviously is a disaster to democracy and those MP's who broke the law should not be vested by onto the citizens to continue to be representing the constituency.

Posted 8 April 2025, 8:24 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment