Thursday, February 13, 2025
By EARYEL BOWLEG
Tribune Staff Reporter
ebowleg@tribunemedia.net
GOVERNMENT officials sought to allay environmental concerns yesterday as The Bahamas prepares to host its first of 20 SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket booster landings this year, insisting that safeguards are in place to protect marine ecosystems and that the partnership does not conflict with the country’s climate change advocacy.
Deputy Prime Minister Chester Cooper said environmental protection remains a top priority and that foreign investors must meet strict environmental standards before conducting operations in The Bahamas.
His comments came in response to concerns that repeated rocket landings could harm marine life and that partnering with SpaceX contradicts the government’s push for international climate change funding.
He maintained that The Bahamas is taking “measurable precautions” to safeguard its waters and marine ecosystems by working with environmental experts to monitor potential impacts. He also touted The Bahamas’ proximity to Florida, stable weather, and open waters as ideal conditions for SpaceX operations.
The government has approved up to 20 landings this year, though each one is subject to regulatory approvals. Mr Cooper said every launch requires a licence from the Civil Aviation Authority of The Bahamas (CAAB), and officials will be notified before each landing.
He also noted that Bahamian regulations allow for charges of up to $100,000 per landing, though he did not confirm whether SpaceX is paying this amount.
Dr Rhianna Neely-Murphy, director of the Department of Environmental Planning and Protection, revealed that her department was officially notified of the proposed re-entry last year and has been engaged in six to eight months of environmental assessments to mitigate potential harm.
SpaceX was required to hire a Bahamian environmental consultant to conduct impact studies. The consulting team, alongside government officials, has been monitoring marine, terrestrial, and avian ecosystems in the area, with findings being continuously updated.
She confirmed that officials have received several environmental reports detailing timelines, methodologies, and assessments, which are continuously updated as circumstances change.
Starting this week, teams will deploy to Cat Island, Exuma, and Eleuthera to install monitoring equipment ahead of the February 18 landing.
Environmental monitoring will continue both during and after the event, with samples collected to assess any potential impact.
The Falcon 9 booster is expected to return to Bahamian waters carrying between 250 and 350 gallons of jet fuel, along with nitrogen and oxygen.
Officials say contingency plans are in place in case of a mishap.
“If there is a mishap — God forbid something happens — we will be working with 250 to 350 gallons of fuel, depending on the weather conditions that day,” Dr Neely-Murphy said. “We will have appropriate vessels in the area, ready to respond.”
She added that the drone ship will land on a tugboat in waters more than 3,000 feet deep and will be guided by GPS. She emphasised that the process is fully automated, meaning no crew members will be on board to manually direct the landing.
Kiko Dontchev, SpaceX’s vice president of launch, assured that safety and reliability remain the company’s top priorities.
“While we’re excited to execute this mission, we won’t fly until we’re ready,” he said. “I’m hopeful that it’s on the 18th, but if we have any concerns about a successful landing, we will stand down and reset for the next available opportunity.”
SpaceX has successfully completed nearly 408 booster landings, alternating between land and drone ships at sea. The company now launches rockets approximately every two days.
The rocket’s fairings, which protect the payload during launch, will descend into the ocean under parachutes and be recovered by a support vessel.
Dr Neely-Murphy explained that within a ten-nautical-mile radius of the landing site, the impact will produce a noise similar to two gunshots.
Ships stationed 17 nautical miles away will hear what she described as “two claps of thunder”, with the sound diminishing further over distance.
Royal Bahamas Defence Force Commodore Raymond King confirmed that a five to 10-nautical-mile safety perimeter will be enforced around the landing site, with the RBDF managing traffic and security control.
Meanwhile, Mr Cooper announced that SpaceX has committed to a long-term partnership with The Bahamas, which includes establishing a space-themed exhibit in the country and donating $1m to the University of The Bahamas.
Comments
DreamerX says...
What contingency plan exists that any sensible citizen would believe that our country is capable of testing chemical leeching for unrecovered parts, handling a fire or cleaning up a residual oil/chemical spill in the ocean? What vessels do we have or can hire to handle this contingency? Is Spacex paying? Is the government making the liability payable out of the supposed maximum 100k per landing costs? Why exactly does Florida not want all this income from SpaceX's welfare checks from NASA?
Posted 13 February 2025, 12:15 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
"*Why exactly does Florida not want all this income from SpaceX's welfare checks from NASA?*"
That is the question. For a billion dollar research operation, cost of transport to from California is not a reason to move to Exuma.
Posted 13 February 2025, 12:49 p.m. Suggest removal
Porcupine says...
Will those who sign off on this get to pocket the payoff all at once, or get a handout per landing?
Posted 13 February 2025, 1:53 p.m. Suggest removal
lobsta says...
It's per landing, because while the risks are really small, they are there. Musk & the government know that, but it is a risk they are willing Bahamians to take. It would be stupid to pay the officials all at once.
Posted 13 February 2025, 2:31 p.m. Suggest removal
ExposedU2C says...
Serious questions all Bahamians need to ask include:
- Why is the U.S. government not permitting these rocket landings on U.S. soil or in U.S. territorial waters? Same question goes for the Turks & Caicos Islands which were recently showered with toxic rocket debris and by miracle suffered no human fatalities.
- Why didn't the very corrupt Chester the Jester specify exactly which Bahamian regulations allow for charges of up to a maximum of $100,000 per rocket landing?
- Why didn't the very corrupt Chester the Jester disclose any other details about the contractual arrangement between the Bahamian government, SpaceX and the U.S. government, including the exact amount the Bahamian government will receive for each rocket landing?
- Who will be pocketing the difference between the maximum of $100,000 per rocket landing the Bahamas can charge under its regulations and the actual (much higher) amount SpaceX and/or the U.S. government will be paying for each rocket landing?
- Who will be liable for the injuries or damages caused by one of these fire crackers going astray and exploding into a shower of thousands of deadly and/or toxic fragments?
We have had the cruise line industry discharging toxic material into our air and seas for many decades and now we have the space industry doing likewise. Yet our corrupt PM has time and time again expressed to Bahamians and international organizations that his PLP government supports all climate change initiatives under the 'Green New Deal' including the capture of carbon credits, etc., etc. Is coward Davis now hiding behind his DPM because he knows just how much of a fool he continues to make of himself?
Posted 13 February 2025, 3:03 p.m. Suggest removal
TalRussell says...
**Me tellin' you somethin'.** --- If all systems go as planned --- Millions across the world will gather in front of televisions to watch ZNS live coverage of SpaceX making its **first** international **attempt** at **successfully** landing a rocket on one of the Bahamas's 1200 Out Islands Cays. Towns and Settlements. -- Which one, all depends upon the accuracy of its protectionary. -- Yes?
Posted 13 February 2025, 4:40 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment