Bell admits foreign buyers are driving property values higher

By KEILE CAMPBELL

Tribune Staff Reporter

kcampbell@tribunemedia.net

HOUSING Minister Keith Bell admitted yesterday that foreign buyers are driving up property values, making it harder for Bahamians to afford homes.

However, he stopped short of saying whether the government would take action, noting that the country must seriously consider the impact of the Immovable Property Act’s repeal in the 1990s, which made it easier for foreigners to buy land.

Mr Bell said in affluent areas, a property valued at $100,000 might attract interest from foreign corporations looking to assemble a larger parcel of land. To secure the necessary individual properties, these buyers may be willing to pay significantly more — potentially doubling the price to $200,000.

He said once such transactions occur, property valuations in the surrounding area automatically increase, making it more difficult for the average Bahamian to afford homes. He said this trend has been particularly evident in eastern and western New Providence, as well as throughout the Family Islands. He referenced Harbour Island as an example, where home prices have surged into the millions, a phenomenon frequently showcased on real estate television programmes.

“We once had what is called the Immovable Properties Act and there are a number of persons and different schools of thought as to whether we ought to bring it back and the implications of having repealed that piece of legislation,” he said.

While Mr Bell did not announce changes or whether the Davis administration would review the matter, he said Crown Land would remain strictly reserved for Bahamians.

The first Ingraham administration repealed the Immovable Property Act and replaced it with the International Persons Landholding Act, a move credited with revitalising the real estate sector and increasing foreign investment. However, critics argue that it fueled rising property prices, speculative landholding, and shifting development priorities, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger Bahamians.

Mr Bell reiterated that more than 12000 homes are needed to meet housing demand in New Providence.

He highlighted a new 160-home subdivision, Adastra 2, planned near Perpal Tract in the Chippingham area, adding to government-led developments such as Renaissance at Carmichael and Pinecrest.

He said the government is trying to ease the financial burden of homeownership through concessions, particularly on building materials and tax exemptions for first-time homeowners.

He said a Rent-to-Own programme, first launched in Abaco, will now expand to New Providence. The initiative allows Bahamians who do not immediately qualify for a mortgage to pay toward homeownership over a two-year period, using rental payments as a down payment.

He expanded on the government’s review of the Rent Control Act, citing concerns over unfair rental practices.

“You know, we have Bahamians who are renting homes and there’s no bathroom facilities, there are no kitchen facilities, but yet, rent is being collected for these facilities,” he said.

Mr Bell highlighted the challenges landlords face when trying to evict non-paying tenants while still being responsible for their mortgage payments. He noted that banks are unsympathetic to landlords in these situations, and even after issuing a notice for a tenant to vacate, the eviction process can be lengthy. Landlords must go through the courts, where tenants are often granted extended periods before being required to leave the property.

He emphasised the need for a balanced approach to rental laws, acknowledging the concerns of both landlords and tenants. He suggested that policymakers examine best practices from other jurisdictions, develop appropriate legislation, and hold consultations to address these challenges. The goal, he explained, is to create a legal framework that fairly protects landlords’ rights while ensuring that vulnerable tenants are not exploited.

Comments

ExposedU2C says...

When you hear a corrupt government talking about new legislation involving your private real property, you should get a prickly feeling on the back of your neck as the hairs stand up straight. Especially so, if this corrupt imbecile Bell is in any way involved in decisions about your real property rights as a Bahamian.

As we all know with this corrupt Davis led PLP government, they are most prone to using legislation to take something from the people under the devious guise of blaming foreigner homeowners and pretending to help the Bahamian people.

Keep in mind that this corrupt Davis led PLP government continues to approve one large real estate development project after another for their favoured cronies, both local and foreign. And their favoured cronies and financial backers usually get generous concessions of one kind or another at great cost to the availability of land for existing and future Bahamian homeowners.

Posted 13 February 2025, 10:41 a.m. Suggest removal

bahamianson says...

This is the stupidest est est est I have ever heard . Wait, why is Bell suddenly talking? Does the ppl think we have forgotten Bell’s last episode with the work permits and Mrs. Ferguson from immigration? Politics, tell the politician to lay low for a while and he/she will be rewarded in due time. Is Bell now doing something to keep his name current for the next election?

Posted 13 February 2025, 11:31 a.m. Suggest removal

birdiestrachan says...

What about the eleven families who own most of the shipping port and can increase their income. If their profits go below 10 perecent. Any corruption there. What about the cruise port what is their involvement.. or does corruption go by hues

Posted 13 February 2025, 1:04 p.m. Suggest removal

Sickened says...

Stick to the topic please. You did so well for a while there.

Posted 13 February 2025, 3:23 p.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

Next week in the Tribune, some other Government member with a shovel for the groundbreaking of a new development priced for Foreigners.

Posted 13 February 2025, 1:19 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment