Monday, January 20, 2025
By NEIL HARTNELL
Tribune Business Editor
nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
The Bahamas faces a “high risk of sovereign [debt] stress” as it continues to reject proposed International Monetary Fund (IMF) reforms such as imposing a personal income tax on the top 10 percent of earners.
The Washington D. C-based Fund, unveiling its full 2024 Article IV report on the Bahamian economy, estimated its suggested package of taxation and spending adjustments could generate a net revenue increase for the Public Treasury of close to 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) - around $300m per year - if fully enacted.
For while again hailing The Bahamas’ “remarkable” economic and tourism rebound from the devastation inflicted by Hurricane Dorian and COVID-19, the Fund pointed out that growth is “expected to slow” to this nation’s historical average of around 1.5 percent “as capacity constraints in the tourism sector become binding”. That refers to the lack of new hotel rooms under construction, with supply unable to meet demand.
And, while describing The Bahamas’ ambitions to achieve a 50 percent debt-to-GDP ratio by 2030-2031 as a useful “anchor” or target for fiscal policy, the IMF report again voiced scepticism that this will be achieved purely by tax enforcement/compliance alone and in the absence of further measures that would include new and/or increased taxes.
The Fund warned especially that “public debt and gross financing needs” of the Government remain high, and it is still exposed to so-called ‘rollover risk’, meaning the possibility that a major institutional investor may elect not to accept refinancing of its existing debt and demand that it be paid out all the principal owed.
The Article IV report noted that 40 percent of the Government’s Bahamian dollar is due to be refinanced this year, and added that this nation remains highly exposed to Dorian-type hurricanes that have the ability to blow a hole in any fiscal year Budget.
However, the IMF also forecast that “spreads” on The Bahamas’ external foreign currency bond debt, meaning the difference between the interest rates this nation has to pay overseas investors holding those notes and what the US Treasury pays on its bonds, could narrow by up to 2.4 percentage points come 2029 if this nation can improve its credit rating via “sustained and credible” fiscal consolidation efforts.
The Government, though, is under no obligation or pressure to accept or adopt the IMF’s recommendations. A number are likely to prove unpalatable, especially any increase in the VAT rate or other new and/or increased taxes, given the Prime Minister’s focus on reducing the cost of living and how his administration touted its reduction immediately after they took office.
And many observers would argue that implementing any IMF reform package in full comes at great cost to the living standards and livelihoods enjoyed by a country’s people given that they invariably involve some form of austerity measures based on theory rather than the practical impact of their implementation.
And the Davis administration, in response to the IMF’s Article IV assessment, again reiterated its long-standing position against any new and/or increased taxes by holding to the faith that improved tax administration, enforcement and compliance methods will enable it to hit the 25 percent revenue-to-GDP target set for 2025-2026 along with other deficit and related fiscal goals.
“The authorities expect that the implementation of these measures will result in an improvement in the Budgetary balance to a surplus of 2.8 percent of GDP in fiscal year 2025-26 and a further reduction in the debt-to-GDP ratio below 65 percent of GDP by fiscal year 2026-2027,” said a report to the IMF’s executive Board meeting on January 13, 2025.
“The authorities [The Bahamas] remain firmly committed to achieving their fiscal and debt targets. Encouraged by the revenue generated from recent administrative and compliance efforts, they are optimistic about reaching their medium-term revenue targets without additional policy measures.
“On expenditure, the authorities agree with the need for additional spending in priority areas, including to support climate adaptation efforts. They are confident that planned reforms - including to the civil service pension system - will help to achieve expenditure targets.”
However, the IMF itself is less optimistic than the Government, although the latter has proven it wrong before including on the 2023-2024 deficit outcome. Referring to its proposals, the Fund said: “Under current policies, the risk of sovereign stress remains high with both public debt and gross financing needs high and vulnerable to adverse shocks.
“The recommended fiscal adjustment is, though, feasible and would put debt and gross financing needs on firm downward trajectories.” The IMF forecast that The Bahamas could generate extra revenues, equivalent to 1.5 percent of GDP in 2025-2026 and rising to 3.6 percent in 2028-2029, through a combination of corporate and personal income tax, reducing real property tax breaks and cutting other tax exemptions.
Besides yielding revenues estimated as equivalent to 0.1 percent of GDP by eliminating the $60,000 real property ‘cap’ on high-end homes, the Fund also suggested it could gain double this sum or 0.2 percent of economic output by ending the VAT exemption for web shops.
And it recommended “replacing the Business Licence fee with a 15 percent profits tax on large domestic firms, while allowing for the full expensing of investment and an unlimited carry over of losses”, as this “could raise revenues without disincentivising new investments. It could be expected to yield an additional 1.25 percent of GDP in revenue by fiscal year 2019.
“A new personal income tax with a top marginal rate similar to that of the corporate income tax could be applied on the top 10 percent of the income distribution which would help reduce incentives to reclassify profits as labour income. Such a tax would yield 2 percent of GDP in revenues over the medium-term,” the IMF added.
Acknowledging that such proposals could be politically difficult to implement with a general election near, as an alternative the Fund recommended raising the VAT rate in line with the Caribbean regional average of 15 percent. While that is estimated to generate a revenue rise equal to 2 percent of GDP, it would probably prove just as unpopular.
“The introduction of corporate and personal income tax regimes would require broad public support and should be complemented with enhancements to administrative and institutional capacity, including training of public sector officials and supporting domestic firms on the transition to profit-based taxation, the IMF added.
“Should these reforms prove difficult to implement, the Government could (as a substitute) raise the VAT rate to 15 percent along with targeted social transfers to compensate the poor.” All these measures have been soundly rejected by the Davis administration already.
However, the Fund said some of these revenue gains also permit public spending increases in “key areas”. For example, expenditure on primary and secondary education could be increased by a sum equal to 0.3 percent of GDP “to train and hire additional teachers including to expand technical and vocational offers, improve student retention rates, and conduct a national learning assessment”.
Other areas that the IMF recommended for spending increases was a 0.3 percent of GDP rise in resources allocated to social services to help “the most vulnerable, including for training and internships of at-risk youth.
And it called for an outlay equal to 1.5 percent of GDP on climate resilient infrastructure “to build more resilient roads, bridges, public buildings and public housing to address rising demand for housing in New Providence and housing shortages in Grand Bahama and the Family Islands that were exacerbated by Hurricane Dorian”.
“[The] proposed fiscal adjustment and implementation of various supply side reforms would reduce debt to 50 percent of GDP by fiscal year 2030-2031 This would reduce sovereign spreads, ease financing conditions and increase the likelihood of a rating upgrade,” the IMF said.
“While real GDP growth would initially slow due to the near-term fiscal consolidation, per capita incomes would be around 1 percent higher than under staff’s baseline by fiscal year 2030-2031. Extending consolidation efforts beyond fiscal year 2030-2031 could unlock additional resources for climate adaptation while keeping central government debt below 50 percent of GDP. “
Comments
bahamianson says...
Well we certainly are spending what we do not have because every year some organization tells us to either increase a tax or create a new one. What the hell is this? Are we all about taxes? Why are we incurring all these taxes and potential increases. Damn , where is that tree , again? This is ridiculous!!!!!
Posted 20 January 2025, 11:45 a.m. Suggest removal
Sickened says...
The IMF trying to kill us with taxes. It's a disgusting playbook.
Why not tell our government to stop spending so much friggin money in padded contracts. We could save hundred's of million each year.
Posted 20 January 2025, 12:02 p.m. Suggest removal
SP says...
Africa, Latin America and many other countries found out the hard way that the IMF and World Bank imposed austerity measures are the biggest debt traps and fastest way to destroy your country in the world!
The Bahamas needs to refinance it's debt with BRICKS New Development Bank and get rid of the IMF and World Bank ASAP.
Posted 20 January 2025, 2:01 p.m. Suggest removal
Porcupine says...
You are absolutely right.
Posted 20 January 2025, 6:47 p.m. Suggest removal
DonAnthony says...
We need more innovative thinking outside the box on taxes, particularly on generating new revenue from non Bahamian sources. For example the previous FNM administration generated $35 million a year from new overflight fees. This fiscal year the current administration will generate an extra $35 million from increased departure tax on cruise visitors, many millions in taxing private cruise island sales and services (vat) for the first time, $150mill plus from new 15% minimum tax on large corporations in the Bahamas. Don’t just take the lazy way out and increase vat on Bahamians, we need more new foreign revenue streams so vat can be lowered! If the govt can find just an additional $30mill this way, vat on all food can be lowered to ZERO, with no negative impact on the budget.
Posted 20 January 2025, 2:20 p.m. Suggest removal
Porcupine says...
Educated Christians understand that a progressive taxation system, such as income tax on the top 10% of earners is what is just and fair. or, a corporate tax.
However, those at the top of the income pyramid are the very ones that own this government, which includes the politicians who write the laws.
It is wishful thinking that a rich criminal lawyer turned politician has the People in mind when talking about taxes.
Those at the top are the very ones who still believe in trickle-down economics, whereby the richest shouldn't pay taxes at all because they are the job creators and the innovators.
That strategy worked out well for the Western world these last 40 years, hey?
And, what happened to the 500 million of uncollected property taxes owed the Bahamian government? We don't hear too much about that anymore, do we?
Why wasn't there the will in this, or any other administration to collect this property tax money? Enforcement is easy. Pay your taxes or lose your property. Oh, because these are the top donors to the PLP and FNM, and the politicians.
Just like the BOB loans that couldn't be collected from the politicians and big borrowers.
Politics has killed this small country.
It almost seems as if there is nobody in the Bahamian government who can do math.
Imagine running a household like we run this country.
Borrow, borrow, borrow.
Posted 20 January 2025, 7:01 p.m. Suggest removal
Porcupine says...
I just paid my Starlink bill. I noticed that it went to Dublin Ireland. I wonder why? The rich no longer pay taxes. Their investments in buying governments have paid off, hey?
Posted 20 January 2025, 7:09 p.m. Suggest removal
ThisIsOurs says...
The thing that all these plans about increased revenue seem to forget is said *high ranking politician* likely has a cohort of *high ranking* colleagues who have a stranglehold on the economy and exact a personal tax through corrupt practices. If they are baseless and soulless enough to deal cocaine, they are also likely exacting taxes from human smuggling, sex trafficking and forged document dealing to illegal migrants that's why the problem cant get fix. Not to mention million dollar kickbacks for awarding contracts to the right persons. By the time the amount sucked out of the economy by this treasonous cabal of vampires is added up, it will double any gains in taxes taken in, leaving the public at large stratching their heads wondering *where the VAT money gone?*
Posted 20 January 2025, 9:22 p.m. Suggest removal
Bonefishpete says...
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday temporarily suspending all U.S. foreign assistance programs for 90 days pending reviews to determine whether they are aligned with his policy goals.
Stop worrying about the IMF and get the country in fiscal balance. A new day is coming some 50 miles from your shores.
Posted 20 January 2025, 10:26 p.m. Suggest removal
rosiepi says...
Davis&Co have raised fees/taxes on absolutely everything, air passengers pay more in taxes now than for their actual airfare.
The new fee per cruiser of $5 on 5.6M passengers for 2024 (up from 4.6M in 2023),
accounted for $28M in new revenue. This is just one fee of increases on hundreds!
So where is all this new revenue going?
Every year since the PLP won in 2021 revenue hasn’t matched the hype of increased visitor numbers and/or streams of new monies generated, new programs, improved ‘Acts’ remain unfunded, supposedly in committee, ’in discussion’ etc.
The deficit increases the borrowing increases yet we have no pandemic, no Dorian.
So where’s all this money collected going?
It’s not going into new hyped programs to improve our quality of life because most remain unfunded and/or non existent.
And why are folks disgruntled with the IMF instead of taking their ire out on these corrupt politicians they insist on re-electing but refuse to hold accountable for bleeding this country dry?
It seems now so much money is being funneled away from where it was intended that the IMF is advising the Bahamas to enact at least a 10% tax just to make up the difference!
You can’t make this stuff up, but apparently you can get away with it.
Posted 20 January 2025, 11:42 p.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment