Friday, June 27, 2025
By FAY SIMMONS
Tribune Business Reporter
jsimmons@tribunemedia.net
Neighbours of a proposed East Bay Street condo hotel and marina project last night voiced concerns over potential noise pollution, invasion of privacy and adequate parking.
Eastern New Providence residents, speaking at a Town Planning Committee hearing the planned Grantanna Holdings Company project, expressed fears that it could result in similar "parking trauma" to that suffered at Goodman's Bay as a result of the GoldWynn development.
Ms McKinney, who described himself as as close neighbour, questioned how many staff will be employed, as well as the maximum number of persons likely to be residing at the property and visiting the restaurant.
The proposed parking garage will offer 54 total spaces over three floors, and cover 29,151 square feet, but she questioned whether eastern New Providence will undergo the same “parking trauma” as that created by the GoldWynn development if the project is approved.
“How many employees? How many people living there? How many guests? And to think people coming to the restaurant. At GoldWynn, for instance, on West Bay Street, there's, there's parking trauma,” said Ms McKinney, arguing that the proposed parking spaces are insufficient to accommodate guests, staff and patrons at full capacity.
“You said that you got 35 staff. You're going to have a marina with 42 boats. You're going to have 12 people in the hotel and you're going to have 100 seats in the restaurant. I seriously doubt that that's enough parking for all of those people if you're working at full capacity, and if you have events there. The math ain't mathing,” said Ms McKinney.
Charlotte Albury, commodore of the Nassau Yacht Club, said she “cant imagine” the amount of maritime traffic that would be created from adding another 44-slip marina to the area. She added that, at her neighbouring marina, parking can be difficult and the developers should consider additional parking for mariners and their guests.
“If you have 44 people that are coming on there, you're going to need parking for 44 people plus their friends who are coming on the boat. We have that problem. So I'm only talking to the problem I know I run into that can be an issue,” said Ms Albury.
“With us, you have to be a member in order to be able to dock at our marina….I'm just saying give consideration that more people will need to have access to your property if that's the way you're going to go with the marina.”
Grantanna Holdings Company proposes to develop a 12-unit condo hotel plus 42-slip marina, along with a clubhouse, parking garage and other amenities, at a site two properties west of the Nassau Yacht Club on East Bay Street. Its president is Lorne Basden, president and director of Basden Elevator Services, and chairman of the Government's Small Business Development Centre (SDBC).
Carlos Hepburn, managing partner at TDG Architects, the project's planner, replied that the parking garage will be used to manage activity on the property and there are only ten condo units which were assigned 1.5 parking sports per unit. He added that the clubhouse will be mainly for the use of guests, but conceded that additional parking may be needed for patrons at the restaurant.
Mr Hepburn said the clubhouse is primarily to serve as an amenity to the condo hotel residences, but it was envisioned that at some point the property may, because of the dining, be open to the general public resulting in an increase in traffic.
Residents also voiced concerns about possible noise pollution, with Mr McKinney noting that a nearby restaurant plays “disruptive” outdoor music on weekends. He said additional noise from the restaurant would impact neighbouring properties.
“One of my big concerns is the amount of noise that will come through to those of us who live in the vicinity. It's already bad enough,” said Mr McKinney. “I would ask Town Planning to severely restrict any outside noise. If you want to have a band or music inside, I'm fine with that, but I don't see that it should be allowed to impact on the residents who are so close by”
He also raised concerns about the lack of privacy nearby residents will have after a six-storey condo hotel is placed overlooking their backyards. “The point is that the neighbours who are immediately to your west, they're going to lose all their privacy. If somebody wants to set up by their swimming pool or something, they're going to have people up there staring out at them,” said Mr McKinney
“They're going to lose their privacy, which may not be your concern, but for people who have homes and want to enjoy their swimming pools or enjoy their yards, you're going to be taking away from them.”
Ms Knowles, another nearby resident, voiced the same concerns, noting that with the amenity buildings and restaurant overlooking her brother’s property it would be a “total invasion of privacy”.
“My family property is here where that line is. It's far too close as a house to have ever been allowed to be there, but now to be a clubhouse, a restaurant overlooking the patio area, the pool deck. It's a total invasion of privacy,” she said.
Mr Rolle, a neighbouring resident that purchased his property more than 35 years ago, said that in addition to losing privacy due to the proposed development, the “massive” resort does not fit into the character of the neighbourhood.
He strongly objected to the scope of the proposed development and highlighted that, although the area may be commercial, other businesses have maintained the character of the neighbourhood.
“The proposed project would change the whole character of the neighbourhood. The southern side, it has been commercialised, that might be so, but the character of the housing on the southern side has not changed,” said Mr Rolle.
“The structure or the plan as presently exists would change the whole scope of, and character, of the neighbourhood. And I strongly object to what is being proposed.”
Comments
Dawes says...
If there is a chance that there wont be enough parking I am sure Town planning will approve. They seem to think that the roads are for parking on.
Posted 27 June 2025, 3:02 p.m. Suggest removal
ohdrap4 says...
The parking mess continues at Goldwyn.
Several cars park on the grass by the bus stop next to the prime minister's office.
This 1.5 parking spaces rule is ridiculous.
If one buys a luxury condo, he needs more parking space.
The traffic at Montagu is horrendous at rush hour anyway, this will make it worse.
I pity the homeowners neighbours. They will be tossing things into their yard.
Posted 27 June 2025, 4:34 p.m. Suggest removal
truetruebahamian says...
This should never be considered in a residential neighbouhood. The plan is out of scope, a high rise that looks over and into private homes patios and windows, parking that will be pretty much non existent and like out west, crowding of nearby properties. Workers parking in Montagu where so many others are currently abusing the parking at the east end of the park as well as abusing the dock being used for a select few politically connected commercial ventures rather than paying for the use of a commercial docking area and drop off/ pick up of tourist passengers and the crowding of taxis and tour cars. Non compliant snack stand has dropped in. All this aside from the problems associated with the main subject, being that of the bad Basden idea of this nearby proposed development which will destroy the integrity of the area. Vote NO to its construction development and existence.
Posted 28 June 2025, 8:23 a.m. Suggest removal
bogart says...
"He (architect) added that the clubhouse will be mainly for the use of guests, but conceded that additional parking may be needed for patrons at the restaurant."
Not only is the parking be required for the restaurant ------- BUT every person in the entire complex would have a birthday, holiday celebrations, anniversary celebtrations, etcetcetcetc and on occasions want to have a gathering of family and friends and will likely require additional parking for their guests. AT times many complex residents may choose to in multiple common celebration of common holidays, celebrations require extra parking activity. Celebrations of common Bahamian culture events is standard and should be known to all and having of guests to come in vehicles requiring parking to attend the event.
Seems quite likely the Bahamian public, students examining Fort Montagu, Fort Montagu field trip excursions, and TOURISM visitors, seniors, Handicapped Parking will have to deal with no parking if any remains in the nearby Montagu public Fort and beach parking area.
Rights and freedoms of the Bahamian people should not be infringed upon by any Gouverment official to create stresses for Bahamians to travel from all over the country to come and enjoy the Montagu Beach and Fort areas.
Posted 28 June 2025, 11:58 a.m. Suggest removal
Log in to comment