Nearly 900 to lose entire Red Lobster investment

By NEIL HARTNELL

Tribune Business Editor

nhartnell@tribunemedia.net

Nearly 900 Bahamians who acquired equity ownership via this nation’s first-ever crowdfunding raise have lost their entire investment after the Red Lobster franchise “decided not to proceed” with its restaurant build-out.

Liquidators for the ArawakX crowd-funding platform revealed in a recent letter that Pinnacle Franchise Brands had abandoned plans to create a multi-location dining network in The Bahamas due to “circumstances beyond its control”.

These “circumstances” were not specified by Ed Rahming, the Intelisys (Bahamas) principal, and Cheryl Simms, the Kikivarakis and Company accountant, but are understood to refer to the passing of Pinnacle’s principal, Chris Mortimer, the late Galleria Cinemas chief and former Democratic National Alliance (DNA) deputy leader. Another factor is also thought to have been Red Lobster’s own financial woes in the US, which involved Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Addressing investors in Pinnacle Franchise Brands, which was the first of four crowd-funding raises facilitated via ArawakX’s platform, the co-liquidators wrote: “Unfortunately, this issuer has decided not to proceed with the business planned given circumstances beyond its control. The joint official liquidators have provided this issuer with its share register. Your investment in this issuer is lost.”

The joint liquidators, in their first report to the Supreme Court on ArawakX’s demise, disclosed that records showed 868 investors parted with a collective $90,384 to purchase some 74,054 shares in Pinnacle Franchise Brands between August 23, 2021, and January 4, 2022. However, Tribune Business records reflect that the company’s principals stated on several occasions that the crowd-funding had actually raised a combined $350,000 in capital.

ArawakX’s liquidators advised Pinnacle Franchise Brands investors to contact James Owen, its now-former chief financial officer, for further information and provided both his office phone number and business e-mail address in the letter. However, Mr Owen, when contacted by Tribune Business yesterday, said he was unaware of this and voiced surprise given that he had stepped down as a director more than one year ago and has nothing to do with the company.

“No comment because I have nothing to do with it,” Mr Owen added. “I left a year-and-a-half ago if not two years ago. I’ve not seen anything and no one has contacted me. I don’t know anything about it. I can’t give a comment on that because I don’t know what the major shareholder has decided to do.”

That shareholder would be the estate and family of Mr Mortimer, who was the main equity investor and financial sponsor in Pinnacle Franchise Brands. However, when contacted in May 2024, Paulette Mortimer, his sister, told Tribune Business to speak to Mr Owen as “the one dealing with it all” - even though Mr Owen himself had previously referred this newspaper to Mr Mortimer’s family after confirming he had stepped down as director.

However, one source familiar with developments confirmed yesterday: “Red Lobster is not moving ahead given the liquidation in the US and that one of the partners [Mr Mortimer] had died.” Red Lobster’s US parent closed 99 restaurants and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US in May 2024, although it subsequently emerged from this process after being acquired by a private investor consortium in September last year.

Tribune Business records reflect that Mr Mortimer and his family were said to have provided $1.5m, or more than 80 percent, of the total $1.8m funding raised by Pinnacle Franchise Brands with the $350,000 balance coming from the crowd-funding. The total loss suffered by these investors highlights just how risky this form of investing - injecting capital into small businesses and start-ups - can be if these ventures fare poorly.

However, given that Pinnacle Franchise Brands’ Red Lobster ambitions never got started and failed to get off the ground, there are likely to be demands for Bahamian investors to be refunded their monies and questions asked about how - and where - the $350,000 was used.

The liquidators also revealed that Nassau Gas & Tanks, the last of the four crowd-fundings facilitated by ArawakX and which began just one week before the platform was shut down by the Securities Commission, is working to reacquire the equity shares purchased by investors and reimburse them.

“This issuer has decided to buy back the shares of all investors from its crowdfunding raise,” Mr Rahming and Ms Simms wrote. “The issuer is in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals to conduct this exercise and will be contacting each investor shortly.

“The joint official liquidators have provided this Issuer with its share register and the KYC (know your customer) information of each investor from the crowdfunding raise.” Tribune Business understands that Nassau Gas & Tanks’ plans have not changed and it is waiting on the Securities Commission to give the go-ahead to begin the refund process.

The liquidator duo, in their report to the Supreme Court, said an unknown number of Bahamian investors had parted with $122,287 to purchase a total 14,830 shares in Nassau Gas and Tanks. Of the four capital raises facilitated by ArawakX, the liquidators revealed that three had not been provided with share registers letting them know who their shareholders and equity owners were.

“There are discrepancies with the share registers - investors are missing on the registers,” Mr Rahming and Ms Simms alleged. “Investors have not received their share certificates, and the issuers were assessed additional fees by the company not shown in their listing agreement.”

To complete the bleak picture, the liquidators said total investment write-offs are not just confined to investors in Red Lobster/Pinnacle Franchise Brands given that ArawakX is insolvent, with liabilities significantly exceeding assets, and little - if anything - of value worth recovering.

Apart from the 116 persons who invested a combined $2.4m in ArawakX itself, those who invested in one or more of the four crowd fund raises - but did not feature on any of the share registers to prove they actually parted with their funds - also face a total loss.

For those in the latter category, the liquidators warned: “Unfortunately, your investment is considered a liability of the xompany, MDollaz Ltd (ArawakX’s immediate parent). You are a creditor in the liquidation of the company. Unfortunately, the company is insolvent and therefore your investment is lost.”

Those who injected capital directly into ArawakX have fared no better. “The company is insolvent. The company has insufficient assets to meet its liabilities. The company is therefore not in a position to pay out a return on investment or to pay its liabilities. Unfortunately, your investment in the company is lost,” Mr Rahming and Ms Simms added.

Tribune Business reported last year that a former Colina Insurance Company chief and at least 115 fellow investors were in peril of losing most, if not all, their combined $2.4m-plus investment in the insolvent ArawakX crowd-funding platform.

The liquidators, in February 2024, disclosed legal opinions finding that James Campbell and his investment vehicle, PJ Enterprises, are unsecured creditors for much of their $1.619m investment.

They were also informed that the majority of other investors who acquired shares in ArawakX, some 115 of 134 persons, should definitely be treated as unsecured creditors after parting with a collective $817,712 to purchase equity stakes in the crowd-funding platform. Given that ArawakX already had a near-$4m solvency deficiency, which was likely to only increase, prospects of substantial recovery appeared bleak even then.

ArawakX’s principals prior to its Supreme Court-supervised liquidation were D’Arcy Rahming senior, the former Bahamas International Securities Exchange (BISX) chief operating officer, and his son, D’Arcy junior. However, the liquidators, in their first Supreme Court report, revealed that ArawakX’s insolvency has almost doubled from the Securities Commission’s initial $2m estimate after they wrote-off more than $1m in assets listed on its balance sheet.

This left the platform and its parent, MDollaz Ltd, with just $508,665 in assets to cover $4.474m in total liabilities, thereby producing a $3.965m deficit with the provisional liquidator duo warning this gap was only likely to increase since “significant sums [are] owed to third parties”.

Mr Rahming and Ms Simms said it was also impossible to cure MDollaz/ArawakX’s “criminal violation” of the Securities Industry Act as a result of the unauthorised public offering that persuaded 134 investors to inject capital into the crowd-funding platform.

The liquidators, in their letter, said their work was close to completion and they will be “making the dissolution application” to the Supreme Court to be released from their duties. “No further liquidation work remains outstanding,” they added.

Comments

ThisIsOurs says...

"*The total loss suffered by these investors highlights just how risky this form of investing - injecting capital into small businesses and start-ups - can be if these ventures fare poorly.*"

Anyone who didnt understand the risk of losing everything shouldnt have been investing in the first place. This is not a bank where you're guaranteed to get back what you put in. Next time buy govt bonds.

"**There are discrepancies with the share registers - investors are missing on the registers,” Mr Rahming and Ms Simms alleged. “Investors have not received their share certificates, and the issuers were assessed additional fees by the company not shown in their listing agreement.”**"

**How is this possible? Where was the Securities Commission???**

Posted 4 November 2025, 2:48 p.m. Suggest removal

TalRussell says...

@ComradeThisIsOurs, Mean the same Bahamian Securities Commission-didn't bother to fast rungs up the Policemans' CID Division on since jail transferred DD's "ex" cellmate, "Sammy the Bankmans'" Fried. --- Not makin' it up!

Posted 4 November 2025, 3:44 p.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

Exactly

Posted 4 November 2025, 7:13 p.m. Suggest removal

tetelestai says...

Where was the Securities Commission?
How do you think the matter got to court in the first instance? Little magical elves from the North Pole?

Posted 5 November 2025, 12:47 a.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

Actually the illegal capital raise was reported to the police by an insider, I ~believe the board member who lost the most money, that's how it ultimately got to court, not through monitoring activities of the securities commission. The exact same thing in the FTX case. This thing about persons not receiving share certificates is another oddity, it shouldnt be possible again, like FTX... like *nobody was watching*

Posted 5 November 2025, 2:57 a.m. Suggest removal

tetelestai says...

You know nothing of what you speak - nothing.
You are too ignorant to even have a conversation with you about this topic.

Posted 5 November 2025, 10:49 a.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

Tribune September 2023:
"*Mdollaz, which trades as ArawakX, was registered with the Securities Commission on January 18, 2021, to conduct business as a crowd-funding marketplace and clearing facility under the Securities Industry (Business Capital) Rules 2021. It was initially owned 50/50 by Mr Rahming and his son.*

*Hillary Deveaux, one of Ms Rolle’s predecessors as Securities Commission executive director, was on Mdollaz/ArawakX’s Board but he resigned on December 9, 2022, to become a whistleblower. Together with James Campbell, the former Colina Insurance Company president, and Felix Stubbs, the former IBM Bahamas chief, **he met with the regulator on October 11, 2022, to voice concerns** about the platform’s operations and corporate governance structure.*:

Yes, that's correct, **as I said before, the largest investor and board member blew the whistle. There is another news article that details his report to the police**. It was **not** Securities Commision monitoring that caught this.

As to being "*ignorant*", I confess, call the knowledge police, there is much to know in the world and I dont know 1/1000,000th of it. And half of what I do know I dont know all and sometimes get wrong

Posted 5 November 2025, 2:53 p.m. Suggest removal

ThisIsOurs says...

And to be fair to the SC, whistleblower reporting is how many financial irregularities are caught in the financial world.

What is alarming about this case and the FTX case is, these two structures were ground breaking ventures into a new Bahamian financial paradigm, and **both**, crypto and crowd funding carried great risk. It was odd then for somone other than the SC to raise reports about "governance". This is something you can demand up front and then check to see that structural norms are being adhered to.

Posted 5 November 2025, 9:01 p.m. Suggest removal

GodSpeed says...

First rule of investing, never invest more than you can afford to lose. Sad to see this.

Posted 4 November 2025, 5:18 p.m. Suggest removal

Proguing says...

In this case, the investment never got off the ground. What happened to the money?

Posted 4 November 2025, 5:40 p.m. Suggest removal

ExposedU2C says...

Lawyers and accountants' (liquidators') fees.....perhaps for ensuring certain creditors were able to get their money back through the backdoor.

Posted 4 November 2025, 7:25 p.m. Suggest removal

Porcupine says...

We see the idea of gambling labeled as "investing".
Little left of true meaningful language.

Posted 5 November 2025, 6:32 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

Agree that people need to know that you always run the risk of losing an investment and people need to take that into account. But there seems to be no recourse when things like this happen. The company never even started, so the funds were illegally used and there should be a criminal case. however down here there is no protection for a minority shareholder so i doubt anything will happen.

Posted 5 November 2025, 9:40 a.m. Suggest removal

Porcupine says...

And what of the dozens, if not hundreds of Nygard's victims?
One would think The Bahamas would seek justice for its people.
Do we care?
Does this administration care about anything but money for themselves?

Posted 6 November 2025, 6:14 a.m. Suggest removal

Dawes says...

No we don't care. Once money is involved we will make any excuse up as to why it is ok, which is even easier if the person gives to charity.

Posted 6 November 2025, 9:33 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment